AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT

The Future of Vacuum Oil Quenching

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Despite years of research and development that resulted in several important technological innovations, the constraints of high-pressure gas quenching are ever more evident. In today’s Technical Tuesday, Robert Hill, FASM president of Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, addresses the creation of a new, robust style of vacuum oil quench furnace. The results challenge the schematics in how the next generation of oil quench furnaces should be designed, built, and operated.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2024 Vacuum print edition.

Introduction

After decades of research and development that resulted in several important technological innovations, the constraints of high-pressure gas quenching are ever more evident. Gas cooling runs into efficacy issues when compared to liquid quenchant cooling, chiefly for heavier cross sections. This stays true even when using specialized inert gas blends and heightened gas pressures.

Additionally, it is undeniable that stringent liquid quench Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) standards for certain aerospace alloy steels will never change. In fact, many industry standards (e.g., SAE/AMS and U.S. defense standards) and client specifications often mandate oil quenching of alloys or component parts.

To meet the demand for an effective, sustainable liquid quench solution, Solar Manufacturing with Solar Atmospheres engineers worked through the tumultuous period of the pandemic to create a new, robust style of vacuum oil quench furnace. Their work culminated in a vacuum oil quench furnace with a 36″ x 36″ x 48″ hot zone that operates up to 2000°F and can accommodate a weight capacity of 2000 lbs. With high uptime reliability and excellent metallurgical results, the NEO™ represents a paradigm shift in how the next generation of oil quench furnaces should be designed, built, and operated.

Figure 1. No decarburization, carburization, or surface contamination when tested in accordance with AMS2759/2 Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Rigorous Design for Metallurgical Excellence

The next generation of oil quench furnaces heralds an era of metallurgical excellence. This is made apparent across three key measures: control over surface contamination, prevention of parts cracking, and flexible processing of dissimilar materials.

No Surface Contamination

Figure 2. Loading in the NEO furnace
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

By implementing a vacuum design to the oil quench furnace, the research team avoided issues faced by traditional atmosphere oil quench furnaces, such as surface contamination and intergranular oxidation/intergranular attack (IGO/IGA). Additionally, they meticulously addressed design concerns regarding oil backstreaming in the new multichambered vacuum system. After two years of usage, the hot zone has remained pristine and oil-free.

By effectively removing the possibility of any surface contamination, both IGO and decarburized or carburized surfaces on oil quenched components are eliminated. These critical metallurgical features are unattainable in traditional gas-fired Endothermic batch furnace equipment.

Precision Prevents Part Cracking

To eliminate the potential of part cracking, quench oil temperatures should be able to be maintained between 140°F to 180°F ±5°F, which enhances consistent and repeatable metallurgical results. Furthermore, having the furnace designed so that quench oil recirculates within a closed loop oil to air cooling system keeps water contamination from infiltrating the oil.

No Carbon Content Matching

The next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces should also have highly controllable atmospheres, devoid of oxygen, which will remove the need to mechanism, which has demonstrated flawless performance for over two years.

Additionally, it is imperative that these furnaces be capable of using more conventional quench oil. A good quench needs excellent vapor pressure, powerful enough to allow the oil to vaporize. Furnaces can be designed with this in mind, allowing operators to save costs by using more conventional quench oils. For example, after rigorous laboratory experimentation into the vaporization of various quench oils at different pressures and temperatures, it was decided to purchase 3000 gallons of Houghton G quench oil, versus the “vacuum only” quench oils that are currently on the market today.

Figure 3. A display of a variety of parts which can be processed in the same run
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

The next generation of oil quench furnaces should also finally provide metallurgical and quality engineers the ability to thermocouple the oil quenched parts in accordance with AMS2750 Rev H standards. Being able to monitor part temperature with up to twelve (12) data points, as defined by the latest AMS2750 revision, ensures thorough and precise thermocouple monitoring, bolstering control and repeatability.

Lastly, in a hermetically sealed furnace, another layer of control should be established through installing an internal camera. With “eyes” into the furnace, the operator will be able to watch the load transfer in real time from a control panel.

Figure 4a and 4b. Thermocoupled parts Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

These operational attributes are on full display in the example of an automated austenitized cycle: At the completion of the cycle, the specially-designed transfer mechanism delivers precisely heated parts from the hot zone to the 3000-gallon oil quench chamber consistently within 20 seconds — all without the expulsion of flames and the discharge of smoke.

Oil flames and smoke are no longer acceptable realities in heat treatment operations. Unfortunately, the heat treating industry has been misled in the belief that a catastrophic disaster will never happen to them. There have been multiple “total losses,” mostly due to oil quench fires and explosions. Recently, it is well known that if an insurance adjuster sights a flame or smoke within a plant, they are reluctant or may even refuse to write the policy.

Vacuum furnaces offer a safe, contained alternative to the harmful open emissions and dangerous working conditions. For operations where the safety and the well being of the workforce are paramount, vacuum furnaces eliminate the risks associated with open flame exposure, explosivity, and skin burns.

Yet the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces should also open at both ends at the end of a cycle to expose it to atmosphere. Full air exchange mitigates the potential hazards of confined spaces.

Figure 5. Top view showing innovative design features for the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Meeting Environmental Demands

With ever more stringent environmental regulations, the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces will play a pivotal role in reducing the carbon footprint of the heat treating industry. It has been estimated that 80% of fuel used for heat treatment could be replaced by electricity, thus drastically reducing CO2 emissions: “When you burn something that contains carbon, you get carbon dioxide that you either must take care of or release into the atmosphere. With electric heating, you do not have any exhaust.”

The second column in the chart on page 30 addresses the multiple environmental concerns associated with traditional batch IQ gas-fired oil quenching furnaces. The third column outlines the advantages of the design for the next generation of oil quench furnaces, which embraces electric heating as a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. As sustainability pressures continue to mount, governments, clients, and primes alike will continue to flow down requirements on how heat treaters plan to reduce their carbon footprints.

Figure 6. Safety hazards in operating atmosphere furnaces
Source: The Monty

Conclusion

As the demands for metallurgical precision, safety, and environmental sustainability continue to mount, Solar’s new vacuum oil quench furnace emerges as a representative of the next generation of vacuum oil quenching technology. Characterized by unparalleled efficiency, precision, and sustainability, such furnaces will continue to lead the industry toward a future defined by cleanliness, safety, and environmental stewardship.

Table 1. Data from the AICHELIN Group
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

References

Kanthal, “Heat Treatment CO2 Emissions cut by 50 percent by using electricity” (April 2019), https://www.kanthal.com/en/knowledge-hub/inspiring-stories/heat-treatment-co2-emissions-cut-by-50-percent-by-using-electricity/.

Aichelin Group, “CO2 Footprints and the Heat Treat Industry,” The Monty (January 2024).

About the Author:

Robert Hill, FASM
President
Solar Atmospheres of Western PA
Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Robert Hill, FASM, began his career with Solar Atmospheres in 1995 at the headquarters plant in Souderton, PA. In 2000, Hill was assigned the responsibility of starting the second plant in Hermitage, PA, where he has specialized in the development of large furnace technology and titanium processing capabilities. Additionally, he was awarded the prestigious Titanium Achievement Award in 2009 by the International Titanium Association.

For more information: Contact Robert at bob@solaratm.com. 

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

The Future of Vacuum Oil Quenching Read More »

Ask the Heat Treat Doctor®: How Do Parts Fail?

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content

The Heat Treat Doctor® has returned to offer sage advice to Heat Treat Today readers and to answer your questions about heat treating, brazing, sintering, and other types of thermal treatments as well as questions on metallurgy, equipment, and process-related issues.

Product failures (Figure 1) can often be traced to deficiencies in design, materials, manufacturing, quality, maintenance, service-related factors, and human error to name a few. Examples of failures include misalignment, buckling, excessive distortion, cracking, fracture, creep, fatigue, shock, wear, corrosion, and literally hundreds of other mechanisms. Let’s learn more. 

Figure 1. Image of damage to left fuselage and engine; fire damage to nacelle.
Source: National Transportation Safety Board
Figure 2.: Model of material science depicting— key interactions and /interrelationships
Source: The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Whatever the source, it is important to recognize that it is next to impossible to separate the product from the process.  Performance, design (properties and material), metallurgy (microstructure), heat treatment (process and equipment), and maintenance are all interconnected (Figure 2).  

When considering ways to prevent failures from occurring, one must determine the factors involved and whether they acted alone or in combination with one another. Ask questions such as, “Which of the various failure modes were the most important contributors?” and “Was the design robust enough?” and “Were the safety factors properly chosen to meet the application rigors imposed in service?” Having a solid engineering design coupled with understanding the application, loading, and design requirements is key to avoiding failures. If failures do happen, we must know what contributed to them.  

Let’s review a few of the more common failure modes. 

Fracture Types on a Macroscopic Scale  

Applied loads may be unidirectional or multi-directional in nature and occur singularly or in combination. The result is a macroscopic stress state comprised of normal stress (perpendicular to the surface) and/or shear stress (parallel to the surface). In combination with the other load conditions, the result is one of four primary modes of fracture: dimpled rupture (aka microvoid coalescence), cleavage, decohesive rupture, and fatigue. 

Virtually all engineering metals are polycrystalline. As a result, the two basic modes of deformation/fracture (under single loading) are shear and cleavage (Table 1). The shear mechanism, which occurs by sliding along specific crystallographic planes, is the basis for the macroscopic modes of elastic and plastic deformation. The cleavage mechanism occurs very suddenly via a splitting action of the planes with very little deformation involved. Both of these micro mechanisms primarily result in transgranular (through the grains) fracture. 

Fracture Types — Ductile and Brittle  

Numerous factors influence whether a fracture will behave in a ductile or brittle manner (Table 2). In ductile materials, plastic deformation occurs when the shear stress exceeds the shear strength before another mode of fracture can occur, with necking typically observed before final fracture. Brittle fractures occur suddenly and exhibit very little, if any, deformation before final fracture. (The following is based on information found in Wulpi, 1985.)

Ductile fractures typically have the following characteristics: 

  • Considerable plastic or permanent deformation in the failure region 
  • Dull and fibrous fracture appearance 

Brittle fractures typically have the following characteristics:

Contact us with your Reader Feedback!
  • Lack of plastic or permanent deformation in the region of the fracture 
  • Principal stress (or tensile stress) is perpendicular to the surface of the brittle fracture 
  • Characteristic markings on the fracture surface pointing back to where the fracture originated  

When examined under a scanning electron microscope, fracture surfaces seldom exhibit entirely dimpled rupture (i.e. ductile fracture) or entirely cleavage (i.e. brittle fracture), although one or the other may be more prevalent. Other fracture modes include intergranular fractures, combination (quasi-cleavage) fractures and fatigue fractures. 

Fracture Types — Wear 

Wear (Table 3) is a type of surface destruction that involves the removal of material from the surface of a component part under some form of contact produced by a form of mechanical action. Wear and corrosion are closely linked, and it is important not only to evaluate the failure but to take into consideration design and environment and have a good understanding of the service history of a component. 

Fracture Types — Corrosion 

Corrosion is the destruction of a component by the actions of chemical or electrochemical reactions with the service environment. The major types of corrosion include galvanic action, uniform corrosion, crevice corrosion, stress-corrosion cracking, and corrosion fatigue. The mechanisms and effects created by each of these are well documented in the literature, as in Fontana and Greene’s Corrosion Engineering (1985) and Uhlig’s Corrosion and Corrosion Control (1985). It is critical to understand that the effects of corrosion are present to some degree in every failure analysis, which is one of the reasons why protecting fracture surfaces is so critical when sending parts for failure analysis. 

Table 1. Differences between shear and cleavage fracture (Data referenced from page 23 of Wulpi, see References.)
Source: The HERRING GROUP, Inc.
Table 2. Typical characteristics of ductile and brittle fractures
Source: The HERRING GROUP, Inc.
Table 3. General categories of wear
Source: The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Final Thoughts

To avoid failures or their reoccurrence, it is important to document each step in the design and manufacture process (including heat treatment). In addition, careful documentation of failures if/when they occur is of critical importance as is assembling a team of individuals from different disciplines to perform a comprehensive investigation. This includes a thorough failure analysis to assist in determining the root cause (there is only one) and to avoid it from happening in the future. 

References

Airline Safety. www.AirlineSafety.com. Accessed September 2024.

Fontana, M. G., and N. D. Greene. Corrosion Engineering, 3e. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1985.

Herring, Daniel H. Atmosphere Heat Treatment, Volume Nos. 1 & 2. BNP Media, 2014/2015.

Lawn, B.R. and T. R. Wilshaw. Fracture of Brittle Solids. Cambridge University Press, 1975.

Shipley, R. J. and W. T. Becker (Eds.). ASM Handbook, Volume 11: Failure Analysis and Prevention. ASM International, 2002.

Uhlig, H. H. Corrosion and Corrosion Control. John Wiley & Sons, 1963. 

Wulpi, Donald J. Understanding How Components Fail. ASM International, 1985.

About the Author

Dan Herring
“The Heat Treat Doctor”
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Dan Herring has been in the industry for over 50 years and has gained vast experience in fields that include materials science, engineering, metallurgy, new product research, and many other areas. He is the author of six books and over 700 technical articles.

For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Ask the Heat Treat Doctor®: How Do Parts Fail? Read More »

Streamline Essential Nadcap Certifications

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, OP-ED

Nadcap certifications are integral to aerospace heat treating. Maintaining compliance, however, can be a headache. Learn how a new technology is streamlining Nadcap certifications.

This article by Chantel Soumis was originally published in Heat Treat Today’s March 2024 Aerospace Heat Treat print edition.

Challenges to Capture Nadcap Certifications

Contact us with your Reader Feedback!

The Nadcap certification (National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program) plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of heat treating processes, especially in the aerospace and defense industries. Recognized globally, the certification sets rigorous standards for heat treatment facilities, ensuring that heat treating processes produce parts and materials with the necessary strength, durability, and reliability.

The certification addresses the data that needs to be documented concerning all aspects of the heat treat processing, such as temperature control, process documentation, and quality management. A survey from the Performance Review Institute (PRI) indicates that 80% of aerospace and defense companies consider Nadcap accreditation as a requirement when selecting suppliers, and 90% of aerospace and defense prime contractors would disqualify a supplier without Nadcap accreditation. And when such a strict standard is implemented and then subject to regular audits, a 40% reduction in nonconformance costs are likely, as was reported by companies in the aerospace and defense sector in a study by the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS).

While compliance with Nadcap and other heat treat certifications demonstrates a commitment to quality and opens doors to lucrative contracts with aerospace, defense, and other precision industries, actually capturing the data can be tedious. The effort and cost of employing disconnected systems — capturing measured data from system A, making the certification documents in system B, and then emailing the certification results to clients from system C — can be cut by synthesizing these actions into one system.

Digitizing Certification Management for Complete Compliance Control

Many organizations facilitate the certification process via digital means. This may be through the use of digital quality management systems (QMS) or enterprise resource planning (ERP) software that includes modules designed for certification management. These tools help automate record keeping, provide alerts for upcoming certification renewals, and streamline the overall certification tracking process, ensuring that heat treating operations remain compliant and efficient.

Nadcap Scanner tracking a process via QR code

But more should be done.

Veterans Metal, a metal finishing plant in Clearwater, Florida, was driving manual processes: everything was written down and data was being entered into spreadsheets for tracking purposes. Like many heat treaters, each step the company took to process a part required manual intervention to write down 20+ line items of information and then incorporate the associated data entry into spreadsheets.

The company was looking to modernize their plant.

After careful evaluation of Veterans Metal’s processes and needs, Steelhead Technologies developed and deployed the Steelhead Certification Scanner (or Nadcap Scanner) line that includes a handheld scanner and a system of QR codes to facilitate an easier user experience, including an interface that allows for swift operator proficiency, typically within minutes. This digital interface allows users to measure data, create certifications, and email this from the one system.

Smart Scanning in Action

The metal processing company received a 15-minute walk-through of the Nadcap Scanner, how to process parts, and where to find the data within the system. Using the handheld device, operators scanned QR codes (specifically created by Steelhead Technologies) that were placed on processing stations. As parts were moved from one process station to the next manually, a user would scan the accompanying QR code on the next current station, locking in data from the previous process and automatically reflecting that the next step was in process.

When operators scanned a process station, the device showed the remaining time in the process and displayed all parts being processed, custom instructions, and key data collection, such as oven temperature. This timer automatically starts when a process station QR code is scanned, gives a one minute warning when the process is nearing completion, and stops automatically when the next process station QR code is scanned.

Chet Halonen, a plant optimization expert for Steelhead Technologies, presented the “Powered by Steelhead” certification to the Veterans Metal team.

With the intuitive layout and guided steps, operators were easily able to navigate the accreditation process, significantly reducing time spent on extensive training. More importantly, the Nadcap Scanner line eliminated handwritten data entry, margin of error, and additional time needed to develop certifications since the scanner automatically generates them from the data and sends them to clients. The scanner has since been adopted by many other Nadcap-compliant operations across the United States.

Take Nadcap Digital

Achieving Nadcap accreditation is crucial for showcasing a commitment to quality, aligning with industry benchmarks, and accessing lucrative business opportunities. With the advent of digitized solutions like the Nadcap Scanner implemented within a comprehensive manufacturing ERP, companies will streamline the accreditation process, enhance operational efficiency, and bolster compliance with a system that’s “literally just button clicking,” as one manufacturer observed.

Embracing innovative tools not only saves time and resources, but also strengthens market positioning and client relationships. By merging the prestige of Nadcap accreditation with digital advancements, heat treaters can elevate their operations to reach new heights of excellence.

About the Author

Chantel Soumis, Head of Marketing, Steelhead Technologies

Chantel Soumis is serving as the head of Marketing at Steelhead Technologies. With a robust background in manufacturing technology and strategic partnerships, she leverages over 15 years of experience to shape the company’s marketing landscape.

For more information: Contact Chantel at chantel@gosteelhead.com.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

 

Streamline Essential Nadcap Certifications Read More »

Heat Treating AM Components to Infinity and Beyond

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, SINTERING POWDER/METAL TECHNICAL CONTENT

The amazing materials that are produced through additive manufacturing (AM) and 3D machining often require post-processing heat treatments before these become final components that launch into space. What are the trends of AM/3D outside our planet, and what technical resources are available to you as you make one step into this field? This original content piece from the Heat Treat Today editors will help you understand where technology stands in 2024.

Why Does AM/3D Go to Space?

Contact us with your Reader Feedback!

A broad spectrum of industries have found the appeal of additively manufactured parts, industries ranging from mining to medical and automotive to space. Much of this has to do with complexity of components that new engineering techniques require, the desire to save on material costs, and the ability to condense lead time. For some, additive manufacturing is becoming essential to the space industry; as Tobias Brune, head of the Business Unit Additive Manufacturing at TRUMPF, has commented, “With our 3D printing technology, we are driving the commercialization of the space-travel industry. If you want to be successful in the space-travel industry today, you have to use additive manufacturing.”

When should you expect this transition? Now.

In January of this year (2024), the first metal 3D printer for space was launched to the Columbus module of the International Space Station (ISS). This is a very active, integrated sense of seeing AM in the aerospace industry, and test runs with this equipment will ensue.

Flight model of 3D Metal Printer Launched on NG-20
Source: ESA

The Exploration Company in Europe plans to use 3D printers from TRUMPF (laser specialist) to print core components in engines for spacecrafts. The intent: missions in Earth’s orbit and to the moon.

Heat Treat & thermal Processing Requirements of Post-Processing AM

If you are going to get involved in AM, it is essential to have the right equipment. One of the most talked about equipment is hot isostatic pressing (HIP) technology. Often, heat treat operations use HIP equipment for post-process heat treating in order to get the solid part they desire. For the most part, commercial heat treaters have positioned themselves to handle the R&D required to navigate the terrain of overcoming processing challenges of new/complex parts and creating standardizations. However, private R&D facilities and departments are also building out their capabilities to handle AM in HIP.

However, so also have vacuum furnaces been a key leader in heat treating AM components. Here, commercial heat treaters have also made moves to expand their equipment/process offerings to accommodate AM parts.

So also do atmosphere considerations need to be considered, with gasses like H2 competing trying to capture the limelight.

Continue the Exploration: AM/3D Articles for Space

Looking for an introduction to the AM/3D topic for heat treaters? Begin with this article by Animesh Bose, an engineering pioneer: “The Role Of Heat Treat in Binder Jetting AM for Metals.” The article uncovers the history of one of the most important types of AM/3D manufacturing — binder jetting AM.

Then, take a step over for an industry focus on what “heat treatments for space” look like. Mike Grande eloquently summarized the current processes needed in space in this editorial from the March 2024 Aerospace print edition. Read “The Role of Heat Treatment in Space Exploration” in the digital edition of the magazine.

In-house or commercial? This article presents critical considerations of space components — with a particular emphasis on the importance of AM/3D — when considering how to grow your processing expertise and capabilities. Several examples from the frontlines of R&D are presented by Noel Brady in his article. Read the editorial, “Thermal Processing for Space and Additive Manufacturing,” for excellent illustrations.

Finally, hone in on the topic with a case study about developments in HIP technology for space component post-processing. This article begins with context confronting issues of structural integrity, especially of complex space components, with HIP. Andrew Cassese gets to the case study towards the end of his article, “High Pressure Prepares Parts for Space.”

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Heat Treating AM Components to Infinity and Beyond Read More »

High Pressure Prepares Parts for Space

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, HIPING TECHNICAL CONTENT

Dive into the role and benefits of HIP and HPHT™ in the space industry, highlighting how these key processes are shaping the future of space applications.

This Technical Tuesday article by Andrew Cassese, applications engineer, Quintus Technologies was originally published in Heat Treat Today’s March/April 2024 Aerospace print edition.

The realm of space exploration and technology is rapidly evolving, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in engineering and material science. Among the key players in this revolutionary change are hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and High Pressure Heat Treatment™ (HPHT™). These processes have become indispensable in manufacturing components that can withstand the harsh conditions of space. In this demanding environment, the longevity and reliability of components are paramount.

Reducing Risk

Space missions have put increasing focus on the need to minimize risk and improve mission safety. Some well-documented, safety-related events include:

  • Outer space
    • Soyuz 11 decompression in 1971
  • Earth’s atmosphere
    • Soyuz 1 parachute failure in 1967
    • X-15 controls failure in 1967
    • Space Shuttle Challenger launch
      booster failure in 1986
    • Space Shuttle Columbia re-entry
      disaster in 2003

Structural integrity is therefore in focus for every single component involved in space missions, with exacting demands on quality and function. Material failure is not an option, and therefore component qualification is one of the main areas of focus. Predictable properties that are reliable and with minimal variation are critical for mission safety. Hot isostatic pressing helps to guarantee this by reducing the spread and variation in mechanical properties.1 It works to do this by using high temperatures and pressures to close internal defects in mission critical parts after casting or additive manufacturing. This increases the density of components and gives them a more anisotropic microstructure which in turn results in more consistent mechanical properties.2

What Properties Are Most Important

The harsh environment of space demands components with exceptional properties. They must withstand extreme temperatures, resist radiation, endure vacuum pressures, and cope with mechanical stress from vibrations and accelerations. HIP processing plays a pivotal role in this, enhancing material properties to meet these challenges. Space manufacturers also must think about thermal expansion/contraction due to temperature variations, compressive stresses, irradiation, and space debris. All of these can affect mission success and can ultimately prevent loss of life, see Figure 1.

Figure 1. Challenges that space-bound materials must endure

Through HIP, components gain increased fatigue life, improved ductility, and enhanced fracture toughness, which are crucial for surviving in space.

Common Materials and HIP Processing Requirements

Materials commonly processed by HIP for space applications include titanium, aluminum alloys, nickel-based superalloys, refractory alloys, shape memory alloys, and ceramics. High-strength aluminum and titanium alloys are used due to their high strength to weight ratio which is key for space missions to conserve fuel efficiency, increase payload capacity, and improve maneuverability.3 Nickel-based superalloys are used in exhaust valves and turbine rotors due to their exceptional creep resistance properties at high temperatures. Refractory alloys like Nb-C103 and TZM are used in high-performance rocket nozzles because of their high melting point and excellent strength at high temperatures. Newer shape memory alloys developed by NASA can recuperate their original shape when heating above specific critical temperatures, and their applications are expanding beyond just actuators.4

As new alloys and materials are developed in the space industry, certifications and standards are necessary for their adoption. HIP effectively eliminates porosity in these materials, ensuring structural integrity and performance under the extreme conditions of space. This means HIP recipes need to be developed and optimized for materials to be tested with their greatest potential in mind.

Challenges in Processing Space Components

Processing components for space via HIP is not without its challenges. Th e extreme conditions required for HIP, including high temperatures and pressures, demand robust and sophisticated equipment. Quintus Technologies applications centers utilize a graphite furnace capable of heating to 3632°F (2000°C), while maintaining pressures of 30,000 psi (200 MPa). The process requires precise control to ensure uniformity of properties across the component. Specifically, the graphite uniform rapid cooling© (URC©) furnace can maintain temperature uniformity while controlling to a specified cooling rate.

Another challenge with processing space components in HIP can be oxidation of parts in the HIP furnace atmosphere. Niobium, for example, can suffer from substantial oxidation at elevated temperatures. In practice, tantalum foil is typically used to wrap the niobium components during HIP and to prevent oxidation from any residual moisture in the argon atmosphere. New products, like the Quintus Purus©, can reduce the amount of oxidation seen on parts aft er HIP while saving valuable time and resources by not having to wrap parts with getter materials like stainless steel, titanium, or tantalum.

Ongoing Research and Unknowns

Collaborations with universities and national labs on projects at low TRLs will help set the foundation for HIP in the space industry. Quintus Technologies, through its application centers, is actively engaged in research to further enhance the capabilities of HIP for space applications. Optimizing the HIP process to reduce costs and improve efficiency through HPHT is one area where the company has already found success, see Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2. Typical thermal processes for additively manufactured parts
Figure 3. High pressure heat treatment with solution heat treatment (SHT) process for the same parts, using an integrated heat treatment approach

The HPHT process can combine stress relief, solution annealing, HIP, and aging into one cycle. Aft er a ramp up in pressure and temperature, the part is held for a specified amount of time before being rapidly cooled in the URC furnace. Aft er this, the temperature of the machine can be brought up to the aging temperature of the material for the completion of an in situ heat treatment.

A Space Case – Launcher Engine-2 Rocket Engine

Table 1. CuCrZr vs. GRCop-42: A Comparison

One application of this is on the Launcher Engine-2 (E-2) rocket engine.

Quintus Technologies, EOS Group, and Launcher worked together to develop a tailored HPHT cycle for Launcher’s 3D printed E-2, first vetted out in an applications center at small scale. The powder alloy in question, CuCrZr, was developed by EOS and printed on an AMCM M4K machine. EOS compared CuCrZr to the NASA alloy of GRCop-42 and found that the CuCrZr alloy was a more economically viable solution for thermal applications with lower strength requirements, see Table 1. The rapid cooling at 200°C/min in the QIH 122 URC furnace at Aalberts surface technologies allowed the team to HIP and solution heat treat the CuCrZr combustion chamber in a single step. The aging treatment was also performed in the QIH 122 directly aft er the solution.5

In October 2020, a full-scale test firing of the E-2 injector and combustion chamber was conducted at the Launcher NASA Stennis Space Center test stand. On April 21, 2022, Launcher’s E-2 liquid rocket engine was able to demonstrate full thrust. Continued tests from Launcher have been successful with performance boost testing
and the first fully integrated engine was ready for shipping on October 12, 2023.6

Figure 4. Aalberts QIH-122 MURC in Greenville, SC (Source: Aalberts Surface Technologies)

Conclusion

As humanity reaches further into the cosmos, the role of HIP and HPHT in manufacturing space-bound components becomes increasingly significant. These processes not only enhance the essential properties of materials for space applications but also address the unique challenges of manufacturing for an environment as hostile as space. With ongoing research and development, HIP and HPHT continue to evolve, promising to unlock new possibilities in space exploration and technology, and their contribution will ensure the success of space missions, safeguarding the lives of those who venture into the final frontier.

Figure 5. Test firing of the High Pressure Heat Treated Launcher Engine 2 produced using additive manufacturing

References

[1] Dominik Ahlers and Thomas Tröster, “Performance Parameters and HIP Routes for Additively Manufactured Titanium Alloy Ti6Al4V. EuroPM,” 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Performance-Parameters-and-HIP-Routes-fortitanium-
Ahlers-Tr%C3%B6ster/faeb46e6eb8ef3e30bc00b91cd1bd8a7c0619200.
[2] Jake T. Benzing et al., “Enhanced strength of additively manufactured Inconel 718 by means of a simplified heat treatment strategy,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 322, (December 2023). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924013623003424?via%3Dihub.
[3] “Engineering Materials for Space Building Stronger Lighter Structures,” Utilities One, last modified November 2023. https://utilitiesone.com/engineering-materials-for-space-building-stronger-lighter-structures.
[4] Girolamo Costanza and Maria Elisa Tata, “Shape Memory Alloys for Aerospace, Recent Developments, and New Applications: A Short Review,” Materials (Basel) 13, no. 8 (April 2020): 1856. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216214/.
[5] Mahemaa Rajasekar, “Processing Copper Alloys with Powder Bed Fusion,” LinkedIn, last modified November 2022. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/processing-copper-alloys-dmls-technology-mahemaarajasekaran/.
[6] LAUNCHER (@launcher), “The first fully integrated E-2 engine is ready for shipping to @NASAStennis for our upcoming full engine test campaign later this year. E-2 is a 22,000 lb. (10 ft) thrust LOX/Kerosene,” X post, October 12, 2023. https://twitter.com/launcher/status/1712636548997607752.

About the Author

Andrew Cassese, Applications Engineer, Quintus
Technologies

Andrew Cassese is an applications engineer at Quintus Technologies. He has a bachelor’s degree in welding engineering from The Ohio State University.

For more information: Read J Shipley, “Hot Isostatic Pressing in Space – Essential Technology to Ensure Mission Safety,” 2020. Contact Andrew at andrew.cassese@quintusteam.com.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

High Pressure Prepares Parts for Space Read More »

Thermal Processing for Space and Additive Manufacturing

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, HIPING TECHNICAL CONTENT, SINTERING POWDER/METAL TECHNICAL CONTENT

The race to space is in full swing with public and private sector companies staking their claim in this new frontier. And breakthroughs in technology and materials offer the potential to propel humanity to unprecedented distances. Success hinges not only on the ability to discover novel solutions but also on the capacity to prepare those solutions for efficient, large-scale production.

This Technical Tuesday article by Noel Brady of Paulo was originally published in Heat Treat Today’s March/April 2024 Aerospace print edition.

Space Today: Making Life on Earth Better, Safer, and More Connected

Noel Brady, Metallurgical Engineer, Paulo
Source: Paulo

According to NASA, 95% of space missions in the next decade will stay in low Earth orbit (LEO) and geostationary orbit (GEO). Th at means the first wave of commercial activity in space will be largely focused on making life on Earth better.

Several worldwide broadband satellites are already in orbit, offering more consistent, reliable internet signals around the globe. Defense campaigns are using advanced satellite machine learning to improve asteroid and missile detection, along with revolutionary laser technology that has made intersatellite communication possible for the first time — and the travel of information faster. And to help make
life in space safe and successful, NASA is developing a scalable network of public GPS receivers for easy, short-range space navigation and tourism.

All this to say, parts are being developed for a wide range of applications, a huge portion of which are being additively manufactured.

Thermal Processing Standards Necessary for AM Adoption

However promising additive manufacturing is for space, the adoption of AM has still been limited due to the lack of standards for proprietary material and 3D printing applications. Many thermal processing experts are joining research institutions and OEMs in the drive to bring AM into mainstream manufacturing with new industry standards and production-ready solutions that help achieve ROI.

The R&D process for discovering these standards can be lengthy and expensive because it requires trial and error. A prototype or small run of parts must be manufactured, then heat treated, and tested for the desired properties. If a test part’s yield strength is not where it should be, for example, then the heat treating recipe is adjusted, perhaps by lowering the temperature and increasing the pressure, and can be tested again on a new batch of parts.

Coach vs. Custom Cycles

In heat treating, there are two different types of cycles, and it’s important to know the difference when you’re working with any commercial heat treater. Coach cycles tend to be more economical because these are shared cycles — existing recipes that are in high demand and run on a regular schedule — with the potential to have multiple clients’ parts in the furnace at once. For example, a heat treater may have a standard titanium coach cycle they run once a day. See Table A for several coach cycles run at Paulo.

Table A. Example of Coach Cycles for Space Alloys

Coach cycles use recipes that were designed for cast parts and have been around since before additive was a viable form of manufacturing. While it’s true that cast parts and AM parts have similarities, such as their high porosity, it doesn’t mean that the recipes are optimal for preparing today’s parts for heavy space applications. That’s where custom cycles come into play.

Custom cycles are ideal for new or proprietary materials that don’t yet have recipes defined or that are not commonly heat treated enough to run on a regular schedule. The distinction between the two is important because not all heat treaters are equipped to run both types. While you may be able to find a coach recipe that gets you close to where you need to be, it certainly may not be optimal, especially for parts that will have a heavy life of service.

Heat treaters with flexibility of custom and coach cycles, along with full-cycle data reporting, offer a high level of control that is vital for helping the industry progress and scale for production. This is also a big reason why some in-house heat treating operations may choose to outsource some of their work: first collaborating with experienced commercial heat treaters to prove the specification for a new part with custom cycles before scaling for production.

Common Cycle Adjustments for AM

There are five primary parameters that can be adjusted in the heat treating of AM parts to achieve the desired results: temperature, pressure, time, cooling rate, and heating rate. For AM parts, adjustments to the temperature and pressure are a go-to for achieving parts with higher yield strength. For example, running a cycle 50°F cooler, but at 5 ksi higher pressure may yield better results.

There may also be certain heating ramp rates and intermediate holds before parts get to the max temperature, to allow for consistent heating and enhance the material properties. The same goes for the cooling process: controlling the rate at which a part cools with specific holding times and intermediate quenches.

Hot Isostatic Pressing, Space, and Additive Manufacturing

Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) combines high temperature and pressure to improve a part’s mechanical properties and performance at extreme temperatures. The sealed HIP vessel provides uniform pressure to bring parts to 100% theoretical density with minimal distortion. The high level of control and uniformity has made HIP the gold standard for AM parts for space.

Similar to cast parts, 3D-printed materials tend to have porous microstructures that can compromise part performance. HIP is the only process that’s able to eliminate these pores without compromising the complex geometries and near-net dimensions that are achieved in the printing process.

Benefits of HIP for space parts include the following:

  • Better fatigue resistance
  • Greater resistance to impact, wear, and abrasion
  • Improved ductility

For this process, Paulo’s Cleveland division is equipped with a Quintus QIH-122 HIP vessel, which is specially modified with additional thermocouples for more precise temperature control and greater data collection. A higher level of accuracy allows us to iterate with confidence and find an efficient path to production-ready development.

One primary benefit of the Quintus QIH-122 HIP is the ability to have faster cooling at a controlled rate, which allows you to heat treat and solution treat in one furnace. This cooling rate allows great efficiency that cannot be seen with other HIP vessels on the market.

It is critical that heat treaters adapt to meet the needs of this fast-evolving industry. Many commercial heat treaters do not yet have the level of data or dynamic cycle offerings necessary and will only run HIP coach cycles with set parameters. In other words, many are not equipped to economically iterate and adapt heat treating recipes for new parts. Without custom cycles, controlled cooling, and a higher level of data, it is impossible to push the boundaries of what’s possible.

Space Parts Requiring Thermal Processing

The future of space travel requires parts that can not only perform under high levels of mechanical pressure and extreme temperatures but are also durable enough for long-range and repeat missions. Heat treatment is a critical step in preparing rocket engine components, among others, for commission. Other space components commonly heat treat treated are:

  • Volutes
  • Turbine manifolds
  • Bearing housings
  • Fuel inlets
  • Housings, support housings
  • Bearing supports
  • Turbo components

Since the inception of NASA’s Space Shuttle Program, Paulo has treated integral components for launch and propulsion, along with many parts currently in orbit on the International Space Station.

Materials Used in Space Parts

New materials and applications are being explored every day. Proprietary alloy blends bring unique properties and promising potential in the push for stronger, faster, longer-lasting parts. But with unique properties comes the need for unique heat treating processes. Several high-performance superalloys used for space include:

  • Inconel 718, 625
  • Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V)
  • Hastelloy C22
  • Haynes 214, 282
  • GRCop Copper

Inconel 718, a championed space alloy, was originally used as a premier casting material before being adopted for AM. This nickel-based material features an extremely high tensile and yield strength that makes it ideal for components taking on a high mechanical load in extreme environments ranging from combustive to cryogenic — making this a natural material to adopt for space in the early days of 3D printing.

Because casting and 3D printing both result in similar porous microstructures, the heat treating process used for Inconel castings could also be adapted. Finding new opportunities within existing alloys like this is a highly efficient way to gain material advantage in today’s race to space.

To learn more about adapting alloys and heat treating processes for AM parts, download the full space guide.

About the Author

Noel joined Paulo in 2011 and spent several years as quality manager before stepping into his current role as a metallurgical engineer. Noel holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering and metallurgy materials science, and he is responsible for thermal process development and hot isostatic pressing process development.

For more information: Contact Noel Brady at nbrady@paulo.com or visit this link to download the full space guide from Paulo.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Thermal Processing for Space and Additive Manufacturing Read More »

Thermal Loop Solutions, Part 1: A Path to Improved Performance and Compliance in Heat Treatment

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, CONTROLS TECHNICAL CONTENT

How often do you think about the intelligent designs controlling the thermal loop system behind your heat treat operations? With ever-advancing abilities to integrate and manage data for temperature measurement and power usage, the ability of heat treat operations to make practical, efficient, and energy-conscious change is stronger than ever. In part 1, understand several benefits of thermal loop systems and how they are leveraged to comply with industry regulations, like Nadcap.

This Technical Tuesday article by Peter Sherwin, global business development manager – Heat Treatment, and Thomas Ruecker, senior business development manager, at Watlow was originally published in Heat Treat Today’s January/February 2024 Air & Atmosphere Heat Treat print edition.

Introduction

Heat treatment processes are a crucial component of many manufacturing industries, and thermal loop solutions have become increasingly popular for achieving improved temperature control and consistent outcomes.

A thermal loop solution is a closed loop system with several essential components, including an electrical power supply, power controller, heating element, temperature sensor, and process controller. The electrical power supply provides the energy needed for heating, the power controller regulates the power output to the heating element, the heating element heats the material, and the temperature sensor measures the temperature. Finally, the process controller adjusts the power output to maintain the desired temperature for the specified duration, providing better temperature control and consistent outcomes.

Performance Benefits

Heat treatment thermal loop solutions offer several advantages over traditional heat treatment methods, including improved temperature control and increased efficiency. The thermal loop system provides precise temperature control, enabling faster heating and cooling and optimized soak times. In addition, the complete design of modern thermal loop solutions includes energy-efficient heating and overall ease of use.

Figure 1. Watlow Industry 4.0 solution (Source: Watlow)

Heat treatment thermal loop solutions are integrated with Industry 4.0 frameworks and data management systems to provide real-time information on performance. Combining artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms can also provide additional performance benefits, such as the ability to analyze data and identify patterns for further optimization. Ongoing performance losses in a heat treatment system typically come from process drift s. Industry 4.0 solutions can explore these drift s and provide opportunities to minimize these deviations.

Heat treatment thermal loop solutions can be optimized using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). FMEA is a proactive approach to identifying potential failure modes and their effects, allowing organizations to minimize the risk of process disruptions and improve the overall efficiency of their heat treatment processes. Historically, this was a tabletop exercise conducted once per year with a diverse team from across the organization. Updates to this static document were infrequent and were primarily based on organization memory rather than being automatically populated in real time with actual data. There is a potential to produce “live” FMEAs utilizing today’s technology and leveraging insights for continuous improvement.

Th e effectiveness of heat treatment thermal loop solutions can be measured using metrics such as overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). OEE combines metrics for availability, performance, and quality to provide a comprehensive view of the efficiency of a manufacturing process. By tracking OEE and contextual data, organizations can evaluate the effectiveness of their heat treatment thermal loop solutions and make informed decisions about optimizing their operations.

Regulatory Compliance

Nadcap (National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program) is an industry-driven program that provides accreditation for special processes in the aerospace and defense industries. Heat treatment is considered a “special process” under Nadcap because it has specific characteristics crucial to aerospace and defense components’ quality, safety, and performance. Th ese characteristics include:

  • Process sensitivity: Heat treatment processes involve precise control of temperature, time, and atmosphere to achieve the desired material properties. Minor variations in these parameters can significantly change the mechanical and metallurgical properties of the treated components. This sensitivity makes heat treatment a critical process in the aerospace and defense industries.
  • Limited traceability: Heat treatment processes typically result in changes to the material’s microstructure, which are not easily detectable through visual inspection or non-destructive testing methods. Th is limited traceability makes it crucial to have strict process controls to ensure the desired outcome is achieved consistently.
  • Critical performance requirements: Aerospace and defense components often have strict performance requirements due to the extreme conditions in which they operate, such as high temperatures, high loads, or corrosive environments. The heat treatment process ensures that these components meet the specifications and can withstand these demanding conditions.
  • High risk: The failure of a critical component in the aerospace or defense sector can result in catastrophic consequences, including loss of life, significant financial loss, and reputational damage. Ensuring that heat treatment processes meet stringent quality and safety standards is essential to mitigate these risks.

Nadcap heat treatment accreditation ensures suppliers meet industry standards January/February and best practices for heat treatment processes. The accreditation process includes rigorous audits, thorough documentation, and ongoing process control monitoring to maintain high quality, safety, and performance levels.

The aerospace industry’s AMS2750G pyrometry specification and the automotive industry’s CQI-9 4th Edition regulations are crucial for ensuring consistent and high-quality heat treated components. Adherence to these regulations is essential for meeting the stringent quality requirements of the aerospace and automotive industries and other industries with demanding specifications.

Temperature uniformity is a crucial requirement of both AMS2750G and CQI-9 4th Edition, mandating specific temperature uniformity requirements for heat treating furnaces to ensure the desired mechanical properties are achieved throughout the treated components. AMS2750G class 1 furnaces with strict uniformity requirements +/-5°F (+/-3°C) provide both quality output and predictable energy use. However, maintaining this uniformity requires significant maintenance oversight due to all the components involved in the thermal loop.

Calibration and testing procedures are specified in the standards to help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the temperature control systems used in heat treat processes.

Detailed process documentation is required by AMS2750G and CQI-9 4th Edition, including temperature uniformity surveys, calibration records, and furnace classifications. This documentation ensures traceability, enabling manufacturers to verify that the heat treat process is consistently controlled and meets the required specifications.

Figure 2. Eurotherm data reviewer (Source: Watlow)

Modern data platforms enable the efficient collection of secure raw data (tamper-evident) and provide the replay and reporting necessary to meet the standards.

Th e newer platforms also off er the latest industry communication protocols – like MQTT and OPC UA (Open Platform Communications Unifi ed Architecture) – to ease data transfer across enterprise systems.

MQTT is a lightweight, publish-subscribe- based messaging protocol for resource-constrained devices and low-bandwidth, high-latency, or unreliable networks. IBM developed it in the late 1990s, and it has become a popular choice for IoT applications due to its simplicity and efficiency. MQTT uses a central broker to manage the communication between devices, which publish data to “topics,” and subscribe to topics that they want to receive updates on.

OPC UA is a platform-independent, service-oriented architecture (SOA) developed by the OPC Foundation. It provides a unified framework for industrial automation and facilitates secure, reliable, and efficient communication between devices, controllers, and software applications. OPC UA is designed to be interoperable across multiple platforms and operating systems, allowing for seamless integration of devices and systems from different vendors. The importance of personnel and training is emphasized by CQI-9 4th Edition, which requires manufacturers to establish training programs and maintain records of personnel qualifications to ensure that individuals responsible for heat treat processes are knowledgeable and competent. With touchscreen and mobile integration, a significant development in process controls has occurred over the
last decade.

Figure 3. Watlow F4T® touchscreen and Watlow PM PLUS™ EZ-LINK®
mobile application

By integrating these regulations into a precision control loop, heat treatment thermal loop solutions can provide the necessary level of control and ensure compliance with AMS2750G and CQI-9 4th Edition, leading to the production of high-quality heat treated components that meet performance requirements and safety standards.

Continuous improvement is also emphasized by both AMS2750G and CQI-9 4th Edition, requiring manufacturers to establish a system for monitoring, measuring, and analyzing the performance of their heat treatment systems. This development enables manufacturers to identify areas for improvement and implement corrective actions, ensuring that heat treat processes are continuously improving and meeting the necessary performance and safety standards.

To Be Continued in Part 2

In part 2 of this article, we’ll consider the improved sustainability outcomes, potential challenges and limitations, and the promising future this technology offers to the heat treat industry.

About the Authors

Peter Sherwin, Global Business Development Manager – Heat Treatment, Watlow
Thomas Ruecker, Senior Business Development Manager, Watlow

Peter Sherwin is a global business development manager of Heat Treatment for Watlow and is passionate about offering best-in-class solutions to the heat treatment industry. He is a chartered engineer and a recognized expert in heat treatment control and data solutions.

Thomas Ruecker is the business development manager of Heat Treatment at Eurotherm Germany, a Watlow company. His expertise includes concept development for the automation of heat treatment plants, with a focus on aerospace and automotive industry according to existing regulations (AMS2750, CQI-9).

For more information: Contact peter.sherwin@watlow.com or thomas.ruecker@watlow.com.

This article content is used with the permission of heat processing, which published this article in 2023.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Thermal Loop Solutions, Part 1: A Path to Improved Performance and Compliance in Heat Treatment Read More »

Traveling through Heat Treat: Best Practices for Aero and Auto

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, CONTROLS TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, INSTRUMENTATION TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, TECHNOLOGY

Thinking about travel plans for the upcoming holiday season? You may know what means of transportation you will be using, but perhaps you haven't considered the heat treating processes which have gone into creating that transportation. 

Today’s Technical Tuesday original content round-up features several articles from Heat Treat Today on the processes, requirements, and tools to keep planes in the air and vehicles on the road, and to get you from one place to the next. 

Standards for Aerospace Heat Treating Furnaces 

Without standards for how furnaces should operate in the aerospace, there could be no guarantee for quality aerospace components. And without quality aerospace components, there is no guarantee that the plane you're in will be able to get you off the ground, stay in the air, and then land you safely at your destination.

In this article, written by Douglas Shuler, the owner and lead auditor at Pyro Consulting LLC, explore AMS2750, the specification that covers pyrometric requirements for equipment used for the thermal processing of metallic materials, and more specifically, AMEC (Aerospace Metals Engineering Committee).

This article reviews the furnace classes and instrument accuracy requirements behind the furnaces, as well as information necessary for the aerospace heat treater.

See the full article here: Furnace Classifications and How They Relate to AMS2750

Dissecting an Aircraft: Easy To Take Apart, Harder To Put Back Together 

Curious to know how the components of an aircraft are assessed and reproduced? Such knowledge will give you assurance that you can keep flying safely and know that you're in good hands. The process of dissecting an aircraft, known as reverse engineering, can provide insights into the reproduction of an aerospace component, as well as a detailed look into the just what goes into each specific aircraft part.

This article, written by Jonathan McKay, heat treat manager at Thomas Instrument, examines the process, essential steps, and considerations when conducting the reverse engineering process.

See the full article here: Reverse Engineering Aerospace Components: The Thought Process and Challenges

Laser Heat Treating: The Future for EVs?

If you are one of the growing group of North Americans driving an electric vehicle, you may be wondering how - and how well - the components of your vehicle are produced. Electric vehicles (EVs) are on the rise, and the automotive heat treating world is on the lookout for ways to meet the demand efficiently and cost effectively. One potential solution is laser heat treating.

Explore this innovative technology in this article composed by Aravind Jonnalagadda (AJ), CTO and co-founder of Synergy Additive Manufacturing LLC. This article offers helpful information on the acceleration of EV dies, possible heat treatable materials, and the process of laser heat treating itself. Read more to assess the current state of laser heat treating, as well as the future potential of this innovative technology.

See the full article here: Laser Heat Treating of Dies for Electric Vehicles

When the Rubber Meets the Road, How Confident Are You?

Reliable and repeatable heat treatment of automotive parts. Without these two principles, it’s hard to guarantee that a minivan’s heat treated engine components will carry the family to grandma’s house this Thanksgiving as usual. Steve Offley rightly asserts that regardless of heat treat method, "the product material [must achieve] the required temperature, time, and processing atmosphere to achieve the desired metallurgical transitions (internal microstructure) to give the product the material properties to perform it’s intended function."

TUS surveys and CQI-9 regulations guide this process, though this is particularly tricky in cases like continuous furnace operations or in carburizing operations. But perhaps, by leveraging automation and thru-process product temperature profiling, data collection and processing can become more seamless, allowing you better control of your auto parts. Explore case studies that apply these two new methods for heat treaters in this article.

See the full article here: Discover the DNA of Automotive Heat Treat: Thru-Process Temperature Monitoring

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Traveling through Heat Treat: Best Practices for Aero and Auto Read More »

Potential for L-PBI Titanium Alloy in Aero and Medical Industries

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, MEDICAL HEAT TREAT, MEDICAL HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL, TITANIUM PROCESSING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Source: TAV Vacuum Furnaces 

Those familiar with vacuum heat treatments are surely acquainted with the vacuum heat treatment of titanium and how such furnaces create the ideal environment for titanium's heat treatment. However, not all titanium and its alloys are created equal. Enter the beta titanium alloy.

In this best of the web article from TAV Vacuum Furnaces, discover the potential applications for beta titanium alloys, as well as the effects that various vacuum heat treatments can have on the mechanical properties of the alloy. Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, specifically laser powder bed fusion, are gaining increased interest in the treatment of beta titanium alloys, due to their efficiency and their cost-cutting potential. Learn more about the chemistry and applications of this unique material below.

An excerpt:

Beta titanium alloys have an unique combination of desirable properties: their high specific strengths, creep resistance, oxidation and corrosion resistance, excellent temperature resistance up to 600°C and hardenability, make them very attractive for aerospace applications. On the other hand, the excellent biocompatibility and low elastic modulus, closer to that of human bone compared to other alloys, make Ti beta alloys an excellent material for biomedical applications.

Read more: "Vacuum Heat Treatment of L-PBF Beta Titanium Alloys-TAV Vacuum Furnaces at ECHT 2023”

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Potential for L-PBI Titanium Alloy in Aero and Medical Industries Read More »

Overcoming Challenges and Finding Success in Latin America’s First HIP Batch

/ AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT, AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, HIPING NEWS
OC

In December 2022, the first HIP batch on Latin American soil was performed. The journey to success in HIP, as any HIP user will agree, is a bumpy road. What are the challenges that aerospace manufacturers with in house heat treating should be aware of when considering HIP processing? Learn how HT-MX Heat Treat & HIPing — the heat treater who ran the first HIP batch in Latin American history — navigated the transition from small tooling jobs to HIP processing for aerospace parts.

Read the English version of the article below, or find the Spanish translation when you click the flag above right!

This original content article, first published in English and Spanish translations, is found in Heat Treat Today's March Aerospace Heat Treating print edition.

If you have any thoughts about HIP, our editors would be interested in sharing them online at www.heattreattoday.com. Email Bethany Leone at bethany@heattreattoday.com with your own ideas!

From Simple Tooling to Aerospace Heat Treat

Humberto Ramos Fernández
Founder and CEO
HT-MX

Writing this story as the first Latin American company to offer Nadcap accredited hot isostatic pressing brings a flood of memories and images to mind. HT-MX’s beginnings were simple, but also filled with challenges, failures, and lessons. When the company began, we were certain that, though small, we were still a “heat treat plant” and not just a shop.

Contact us with your Reader Feedback!

Being located in Mexico means that there were large companies with headquarters located far away — potential customers — that would be deciding on their heat treat supplier close to their location. We worked hard to be and to present ourselves as being very professional. But a lesson soon learned was that achieving trust with partners takes a lot more than a good speech and a clean plant.

Unsurprisingly, the first jobs were simple tooling work, like quench and tempering tooling and carburizing gears. A junior engineer and I would drive around in my old hatch-back to local machine shops and pick up a small shaft or gear and bring it back to the plant. We would get so excited when we got the case depth right.

With minimal resources, we decided to complete quality control ourselves. We became friends with a quality manager from a local company, and he came over to help on weekends and after 6:00pm until the audit date came. His knowledge is still in use at HT-MX to this day. I remember celebrating with a “Carne Asada” (a Mexican style barbecue) when we finished that first audit, thinking we had just made a huge step forward, not realizing how far away we still were from our vision.

HT-MX Team
Source: HT-MX Heat Treat & HIPing

But as time passed, we turned our attention to the aerospace industry in Chihuahua, a city with four OEMs. We received the AS9100 certification and started working on Nadcap accreditation. This required time, but by then, a pretty strong engineering team was in action, and successfully obtained Nadcap accreditation in late 2019. Again, we celebrated with a Carne Asada, this time, with a better understanding on where we were and what future challenges we needed to face.

Taking On Hot Isostatic Pressing

HIP system at HT-MX
Source: HT-MX Heat Treat & HIPing

The pandemic hit. Boeing’s 737 Max crisis continued to impact the industry. Moving into aerospace was slow with limited volume, especially compared to what we had seen in the automotive and oil and gas industry. But by now, international companies were more willing to transfer heat treat operations to Mexican suppliers, and we were ready, beginning with running aluminum batches, precipitation hardening, annealing, and other standard processes. It was during this early start to serve the aerospace industry that we heard about hot isostatic pressing (HIP).

Around 2019 during an aerospace cluster event, an OEM with a local presence approached us with their HIP requirements. I had only heard of HIP, but I was immediately interested — until I found out how much one of those machines cost!

But good financing through government programs helped make this HIP project a reality. Timing was not the best, as the federal election in Mexico caused a temporary Mexican currency depreciation, handicapping the project at its beginning.

Getting the proper certifications and validations proved to be a long and complex process, too. Theoretically, we knew what to expect, in terms of getting the Nadcap checklist approved, but the reality was a little different. Gaining Nadcap certification slowly builds a certain culture into any company in its day-to-day activities. Translating that culture into a completely different business unit, new crew, and new process proved to bring its own challenges.

HIP Challenges: Pressure, Temperature, Thermocouples, and Argon Supply

Heat treating usually handles temperature, atmosphere control (or lack of), and regular traceability requirements. HIP, however, adds a few new dimensions to what we usually see: internal pressure, very high temperatures — up to 3632°F (2000°C) — and argon supply. It was the first time HT-MX dealt with a process that incorporated up to 30,000 psi and also used a lot of high purity argon.

Pressure has its own challenges, though the HIP press takes care of those challenges. Still, the internal workings on these kinds of presses are fundamentally different than that of a regular heat treat furnace. Yes, you need to heat it up, but apart from that, it’s not even a furnace but a press. Understanding how the machine works, what happens inside with all that pressure, how it affects the components undergoing hot isostatic pressing, and how it affects the baskets you’re using is a critical learning curve.

High temperatures change everything about running these types of cycles. We work with metals, which means temperatures range between 1832°F and 2372°F (1000°C and 1300°C). This has an impact on thermocouple selection, calibration, and more; with the company’s thermocouple product suppliers based in the U.S., this entails more challenges and extra costs. I have lost count on those urgent same-day trips to the border to retrieve critical spares in time. It’s an 800-km/498-mi roundtrip! We have fortunately found a great supplier that has offered the technical feedback we needed, and we have started to finally understand and control our thermocouple consumption. Although, I must be honest here, we still have a lot to learn in this aspect.

Then, there’s the argon supply. HT-MX never expected it to be a challenge, but it turns out getting the proper supplier — one that understands the requirements and is willing to work with you from validation to production — is key. You might be able to start your validation process using argon transported in gas containers but eventually you will need to switch to liquid argon. That proved to be more difficult than expected. There are not many projects requiring these kind of alliances locally. Getting the right supplier was key and more of a challenge than expected. And then came the lessons on efficiently using the liquid argon, avoiding excessive venting of the tank, and being all around smart with the HIP schedule. This has been a constant learning process, one that has high costs.

Final Hurdles: Certifications, Current Events, and Energy Costs

Once our company had the Nadcap certification, we still needed to get the OEM’s approval for the HIP process, then the approval for the specific version of the HIP process, and then the actual approval for the part numbers.

These approvals were handled by the headquarters’ engineering department and not locally. It was a time-consuming process, with several test runs, lab testing, multiple audits, visits, and more testing, etc. And while all of this was happening, we still had to design the operation, locate critical suppliers not available in Mexico, create alliances with suppliers, etc. Writing this down in a few lines makes it seem simpler and quicker than it really was.

HT-MX Nadcap certification
Source: HT-MX Heat Treat & HIPing

Additionally, in instances like this, Mexican companies, especially small ones, face much more scrutiny than U.S. or European-based companies, and must prove themselves in every single step. It makes sense, even if it feels a little unfair, as HT-MX had no proven track record of high tech processes such as HIP. It does cost extra time, extra care, and sometimes extra testing, but it is the reality we face and we must overcome the extra hurdles.

While navigating HIP approval, the pandemic hit. Months later, the war in Europe began with significant impacts on the cost of energy. Our main clients were high volume and low margin, and with energy prices rising, our competitiveness began to diminish. To adapt and evolve, we decided to add some smaller furnaces for smaller parts, invest in training and increased sales efforts, and focus on AMS/Nadcap-based customers, letting go of major clients. Slowly, things began to turn around.

The First Official HIP Batch in Latin America History

In December 2022, HT-MX ran the first official HIP batch in Latin American history. It was a long time coming. I always thought that running that first batch would feel like reaching the Everest summit. When the day came, it just felt like reaching Everest’s base camp. We still have a long way to go to be truly an established HIP supplier. Now, it’s back to climbing and shooting for that summit, that summit that will perpetually precede the next summit.

There are still several challenges: stabilizing new processes and improving established ones. But I am confident we will move forward in this new stage. And I am so looking forward to the next Carne Asada.

About the Author: Humberto Ramos Fernández is a mechanical engineer with a master’s degree in Science and Technology Commercialization. He has over 14 years of industrial experience and is the founder and current CEO of HT-MX Heat Treat & HIPing, which specializes in Nadcap-certifi d controlled atmosphere heat treatments for the aerospace, automotive, and oil and gas industries. With customers ranging from OEMs to Tier 3, Mr. Ramos has ample experience in developing specific, high complexity secondary processes to the highest requirements.

Contact Humberto at humberto@ht-mx.com

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Overcoming Challenges and Finding Success in Latin America’s First HIP Batch Read More »