BULK GASES & SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT

Heat Treat Tomorrow – Hydrogen Combustion: Our Future or Hot Air?

OCDoug Glenn, publisher of Heat Treat Today, moderates a panel of 5 experts who address questions about the growing popularity of hydrogen combustion and what heat treaters need to do to prepare. Below is an excerpt of this lively and compelling discussion. 

To view the 1-minute trailer or register to watch this FREE video, go to www.heattreattoday.com/2021-09-H2-Vid

Today’s Technical Tuesday was originally published in Heat Treat Today's December 2021 Medical & Energy print edition.


Introduction

Doug Glenn (DG): Welcome to this special edition of Heat Treat Radio, a product of Heat Treat Today. We’re calling this special episode “Heat Treat Tomorrow: hydrogen combustion. Is it our future or is it just a bunch of hot air?” This discussion is sponsored by Nel Hydrogen, manufacturers of on-site hydrogen generation systems. I’m your host, Doug Glenn, the publisher of Heat Treat Today and the host of Heat Treat Radio. I have the great privilege of moderating this free-for-all discussion today with five industry experts who I’d like to introduce to you now.

Perry Stephens
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

Dr.-Ing. Joachim G. Wünning
President
WS Wärmeprozesstechnik GmbH

First, Perry Stephens. He is the principle technical leader of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and currently leads the end-use technical subcommittee of the low carbon resource  initiative (LCRI) which is a collaborative eff ort with the Gas Technology Institute (GTI), and nearly 50 sponsor companies and organizations. They aimed at advancing the low carbon fuel pathways on an economy-wide basis for the achievement of decarbonization. EPRI is a member of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association (IHEA).

Joachim Wuenning (Joe Wuenning) is the owner and CEO of WS Thermprocess Technic Gmbh [WS Wärmeprozesstechnik GmbH] in Germany and WS Thermal Process Technology, Inc. in Elyria, Ohio. Joe’s company has been on the cutting edge when it comes to hydrogen combustion. In fact, the last time I heard you, Joe, was at the Thermprocess show in Düsseldorf, where you gave the keynote address regarding the advent and development of hydrogen combustion. Joe’s company has been a leader in hydrogen combustion. Joe’s company is an IHEA member as well. Joe is our European representative, and may provide us with a different perspective.

John Clarke is the technical director of Helios Electric Corporation (Fort Wayne, Indiana), a company that specializes in energy and combustion technologies. John is also a regular columnist for Heat Treat Today and a past president of IHEA.

Jeff Rafter is vice president of sales and marketing for Selas Technologies out of Streetsboro, Ohio and has a rich history in the combustion industry as well, including many years with Maxon Corporation. He’s got 28 years of industrial experience in sales, research and development, and marketing. He’s a combustion applications expert in process heating, metals refining, and power generation and has also served 10 years on the NFPA 86 committee and holds a patent for ultra-low NOx burner designs. He is also an IHEA member.

Finally, we have Brian Kelly with an equally rich history in combustion, spending most of his years at Hauck Manufacturing in Lebanon, PA, where he did a lot in sales and engineering before they were purchased by Honeywell. Brian currently works for Honeywell Thermal Solutions and is also an IHEA member.

Gentlemen, thank you for joining us. Let’s just jump right in. Brian, since I picked on you last, let’s go to you first on the questions.

Is Hydrogen Combustion the Future?

DG: Is this hydrogen combustion thing coming? And, if so, how soon and what’s driving it?

Brian Kelly (BK): It is coming and there is going to be a lot of back and forth in that it doesn’t make sense and all that. It is here. We’re seeing inquiries from customers that ask, “Hey, do we have burners that do this, control systems and stuff that do that?” The news that I get emails on, for example, is that with one of the steel companies in Europe, they already said their plan is totally going to be hydrogen. We’re delivering billets right now of hydrogen.

So, yes, it’s coming. Is it coming soon? It’s here today. Widespread? That’s going to be a longer road. I think you’re going to hear from people that know more about it than I do, but, certainly from industry buzz, we’re testing burners, we’re making sure our burners run on partial hydrogen, full hydrogen, safety valves, control valves, and all that is definitely within a lot of the testing that we’re doing right now beyond the usual R&D on lower emissions burners and things of that nature.

Jeff Rafter (JR): I have a slightly different answer, but I agree with Brian. I think hydrogen combustion has been here for over a century. The difference has been, it’s been largely restrained to a few industries that have a regular hydrogen supply. A great example would be refining and petrochemical industries. We have had, for literally decades, burners designed to burn pure hydrogen, for example, in applications like ethylene crackers.

The fundamentals of hydrogen combustion are very well known. The next evolution that we’re currently in the process of seeing is taking more industries into an availability of hydrogen as a fuel and modifying designs and process heating equipment to accept it. There are fundamentally a lot of changes that occur when you switch the fuel, and we can get into more of those later with more relevant questions, but it doesn’t come without challenges. There is quite a bit to be done, but I think the fundamental science is already well-known. There is a lot of design work to be done and there is a lot of economic and supply development yet to be had.

John Clarke (JC): Yes, I certainly think it is coming, but the timing is uncertain. And, when I say “coming,” I mean deployed in a certain or large volume. When we simply talk about hydrogen, I do think the order of deployment is somewhat predictable and when it comes to pure hydrogen, I think it will likely be deployed first for transportation, and only after that need is met, as a process heating fuel, widely. Now, if there is a breakthrough in battery technology, this order of deployment may change. But, right now, it looks like hydrogen represents an opportunity for higher energy density for long haul transportation. And, if we’re pushing hard to reduce CO2 or carbon emitted, I think policy will be implemented in a means to maximize a reduction of carbon. That’s where I think they’ll be pushing harder.

Now, that said, partial hydrogen, blending hydrogen into natural gas, is likely to occur perhaps sooner than that.

Joachim Wuenning (JW): Not really. I think a lot of things were said correctly and I strongly believe it has to come. If you believe in climate change, it must happen because we cannot use fossil fuels forever. I also don’t believe that we will have an all-electric world. I don’t believe in nuclear power, so we cannot get all our energy from that, therefore, chemical energy carriers will be necessary for storage and long-haul transportation. Is it coming soon? Of course, it is hard to predict how fast it will be. Now, fossil fuel is cheap so it will be hard to compete with as hydrogen is likely to be more expensive.

But certainly, what we see is the requirement from our customers to have hydrogen ready burners. Because, if they invest in equipment at that point, why would they buy a natural gas only burner. They should, of course, look for burners which are able to do the transition without buying all new equipment again. So, we have a lot of projects momentarily to demonstrate the ability of the equipment to run with hydrogen or natural gas and, preferably, not even readjusting the burners if you switch from one to another gas.

Perry Stephens (PS): I’ll try to add something a little different. At EPRI, we’re charged with providing the analysis and data from which other folks, like these gentlemen, are going to try to base important business decisions. Our work hasn’t focused specifically on hydrogen, but, more generally, the class of alternate energy carriers — molecules, gas, or liquid — that can be produced in low carbon first energy ways through renewable energy sources. A lot of our work is focused on understanding the pathways from the initial energy which as a biomass source, solar, wind, could be nuclear, could be hydro. These sources of electric power that ultimately have to be used to produce this low carbon hydrogen. One other pathway is hydrogen or hydrogen-based fuels produce the steam methane reformation process which uses a lot of hydrocarbons but would then require carbon capture and sequestration. The CO2 from these processes could be employed in a circular economy fashion. So, we look at all of these.

The real challenge is the challenge of cost. How do you produce this hydrogen or alternate fuel? And there are many other potential fuel molecular constructs that could be deployed. Ammonia is one being discussed in some sectors. And then how do you transport them, store them, and what is their fuel efficiency and the cost of either new equipment or conversion of existing equipment to deploy those. We’re not specifically focused on hydrogen. It is a very important energy carrier. It can be blended with fossil fuels in the near-term and then maybe expanded in the long term to higher percentages up to pure hydrogen depending on the application, depending on where you produce it. These costs must be evaluated and that is a big job that we’re doing at EPRI with our LCRI initiative right now. We are trying to understand that techno economic analysis, that is, what makes the most sense for each sector of the economy.

Why Not Electricity?

DG: Thanks, guys. Joe had mentioned global warming, a driving force here. Why not electricity? Why don’t we just convert everything over to electricity? Perry, you’re with EPRI, let’s start with you on that. Instead of going just straight-out hydrogen, why not just go to electricity?

PS: I think the question again rephrased might be, “when electricity and when hydrogen” because I think that’s really what we’re trying to decide. There are interesting areas of research involving catalysis techniques that dramatically improve the net energy efficiency of chemical processes, for example, that might make direct electrification of certain processes more competitive. There are electric technologies for the low- to midrange temperatures that are attractive and use pieces of the electromagnet spectrum to produce transformation of products, heating and/or other transformations, that are very cost effective today. So, we judge that a portion, maybe something approaching 30% of the remaining fossil fuel, could be electrified. A certain chunk, a quarter, maybe reduced consumption through energy efficiency, 30% or more through electrification. It’s that difficult-to-electrify piece. Steam-based processes and other direct combustion processes where electric technologies — for one reason or another, don’t look like they offer a strong solution, at least today — that we’re really concerned with. And, both in steam production and direct combustion of fossil fuels today, many cases we’re looking at having to have some sort of alternate combustible fuel.

JC: I’m not sure I completely agree with your question. In some ways, clean hydrogen, or environmentally or low carbon hydrogen, is electricity. It is simply a different means of storing electric power because the source of that is going to be some sort of renewable power, more likely than not, photovoltaics, wind, hydroelectric; those are going to be the electricity we use to break down the water to generate the hydrogen that we then go ahead and store. So, the alternative is whether we use batteries or hydrogen to store this electricity and make it available either in a mobile setting, in a car or a truck, or off-peak times, at times when we are not able to generate electricity from renewables.

I think the question really is more along the line of end use. When are we going to be using electricity for the final end use? We’re kind of process heating guys around this table. I think it’s going to come down to economics, for the most part. And I don’t think we’re quite there yet.

JW: Electricity is fine for some applications. I’ve driven an electric car for the last 10 years, but in long range, I drive the fuel cell hydrogen car from my father, so different technologies for different purposes. There might be batch processes where I can have a break of a week if there is no sunshine and do the batch processing when electricity is available. But if I have a continuous furnace with 100 megawatts which should run 365 days a year, it will be tough to produce the electricity constantly from a renewable basis to fulfill all these requirements. I think it’s just more economic and makes more sense to use the right technology for the right processes. It’s not an either/or. Use the right technology for the right application.

BK: I would just back what Joe says. It can be selective to industry, the furnace type, or the type of material being processed. I know I’ve dealt in my career with a lot of the higher temperature type applications — ceramics and heat treating and things of that nature. If you start getting above 2000 degrees Fahrenheit and up, and especially dealing with airspace, uniformity has a lot to do with it.

Electricity can be hard to get that uniformity without moving fans and having fans that operate at higher temperatures is another challenge. It’s extremely challenging and a big cost factor. What most people have said here is that it is probably not either/or. We see a lot of electricity being used but we’re fossil fuel burner guys, so we’re going to push that efficiency and that kind of cost.

You’re not going to want to miss the rest of this thought-provoking discussion. To watch, listen, or read in its entirety, go to heattreattoday.com/2021-09-H2-Reg.

Heat Treat Tomorrow – Hydrogen Combustion: Our Future or Hot Air? Read More »

Stop the Burn: 3 Tips to Cut Natural Gas Costs

op-edFor the next series of articles on heat treaters and combustion, the focus will be on the cost of natural gas and how we can reduce its consumption. Given significant movements in natural gas prices, it is essential we shift our focus to this important pocketbook issue.

This Technical Tuesday column appeared in Heat Treat Today’s November 2021 Vacuum Furnace print editionJohn Clarke is the technical director at  Helios Electric Corporation and is writing about combustion related topics throughout 2021 for Heat Treat Today.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electrical Corporation
Source: Helios Electrical Corporation

What Is the Cost To Operate My Burner System?

We will begin this and future articles by looking at natural gas prices and price forecast(s) that are published by the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Agency (EIA). Unlike the price for gasoline, we don’t drive past large, illuminated billboards displaying the current price of natural gas on our way to work, even though it is a significant operating cost for all heat treaters. Even if you operate primarily electrically heated equipment, natural gas is likely used to generate your electrical power. Obviously, neither Heat Treat Today or this author make any claims as to the accuracy of these projections. In other words, please don’t shoot the messenger. The American taxpayer funds this agency and it is only reasonable that we see what they have to say.

Let’s start with a quick definition. Henry Hub is a gas pipeline located in Erath, Louisiana that serves as the official delivery location for futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange. This hub connects to four intrastate and nine interstate pipelines. It is unlikely any industrial consumer pays the Henry Hub price alone for the natural gas they consume. There are a great many other factors that determine the price that appears on your monthly bill; but the Henry Hub price is indicative of pricing trends and represents a consistent way to discuss the cost.

A good website to bookmark in your browser is www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/. It is a quick read and will be the primary reference for my monthly sidebar. Let’s first look at the spot price trend. The spot price is the current price at which a natural gas can be bought or sold for immediate delivery at the Henry Hub. There is volatility in the price of natural gas because of supply, demand, and trading activities (speculation), but when we expand the time horizon, it provides a representative look at the pricing trend. This trend will be reflected in the price we will pay in the future. The prices quoted are in terms of U.S. Dollars per 1,000,000 BTU — roughly 1,000 SCF of natural gas.

The EIA also provides forward-looking projections — but we will leave it to the reader to explore this information on the EIA website. The intent of this series of articles is not to provide the basis of trading futures, but rather to provide some ideas on how to save money.

We can see a definite upward trend. When we combine this data with our understanding that natural gas is increasingly being used to displace coal to generate electricity and North America’s increasing capacity to export liquified natural gas (LNG), there is reason to believe this is a durable trend. We can expect to pay more next year than the recent past to heat our equipment. And in time, this higher fuel cost will lead to higher electrical rates.

How Can I Save Natural Gas?

To save natural gas, we can optimize our processes, reduce unnecessary air, and contain heat within the furnace and/or capture the energy that leaves our system to preheat work or combustion air. Ideally, we should take advantage of all these opportunities — provided the effort pays for itself. In general, operators of heat processing equipment are aware of these opportunities but are not always confident when determining the payback for their investments in time and capital. We will endeavor to bring clarity to these decisions by not only discussing opportunities, but also discussing how to quantify the value of the opportunities. The following are the questions that will be answered in future articles:

Optimizing the Process:

  1. How do I know when the material I am heating is at the desired temperature?
  2. Do I have excessive factors of safety built into my process to compensate for not knowing the temperature at the core of the part being heated?
  3. How much fuel can I save with a shorter cycle?

Reducing Air or Containing Heat:

  1. Is my furnace or oven at the correct internal pressure?
  2. Is it time to rebuild door jams?
  3. How much fuel is wasted because I am not containing heat within the furnace or letting excessive air reduce my combustion efficiency?

Reducing the Heat Exiting the System:

  1. Can I justify installing recuperators to preheat combustion air?
  2. Can the heat from my system be used to preheat work? If so, will I shorten my cycle time and save fuel?

No one likes rising energy prices, but if the trend is up, it is better to recognize reality and invest accordingly. It is our wish that future columns will provide ideas and tools to help you get the most from the energy you consume. If you have specific requests or questions that might guide our discussions, please let us know.

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

Stop the Burn: 3 Tips to Cut Natural Gas Costs Read More »

Combustion Corner: Natural Gas 101

Natural gas. It’s a necessity for producing energy and a staple in the heat treating industry. In this reader-friendly and thorough guide of all things natural gas, learn about its supply and demand, availability, pricing, consumption and much more.

This column will appear in Heat Treat Today’s 2021 Atmosphere-Air February print edition.

Heat Treat Today is pleased to announce that John Clarke, technical director at Helios Electric Corporation, will be writing about combustion related topics throughout 2021. John has been a long-time friend of Heat Treat Today and his expertise in system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems will be incredibly helpful as he navigates us through all things energy as it relates to heat treating equipment.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electrical Corporation

This article is the first in a series describing trends in energy use and technology used in heat treating equipment. So, it is important to first discuss the supply and demand for natural gas–the energy source on which we depend for not only combustion for heating, but also to generate a substantial share of our electricity.

Heat treaters, be they captive or commercial, are dependent on natural gas to power their operations. Its price and availability are areas deserving special attention from anyone responsible for the purchase, maintenance, and operation of heat-treating equipment.

The good news is that the sky is not falling. In fact, it is a pleasant and sunny day, figuratively speaking. The bad news is that we are increasingly dependent on this one energy source. The economic impact from rapid spikes in cost will be even more severe than they were in the 2005-2009 period, when the United State saw prices for natural gas double in just a few days.

ipsen ad
Natural gas production in the U.S. has effectively doubled in the last 15 years (US Monthly dry natural gas production has moved approximately 1.5 trillion cubic feet in 2005 to nearly 3.0 trillion cubic feet.),1 while the average price has fallen 50%.2 (Average Citygate Price–cost as the fuel is transferred from the pipeline company to the local distribution company– has fallen from around $8.00 USD/mmBTU to less than $ 4.00/mmBTU.)2  It seems that the economics professors were right – as supply expands, prices fall. And these prices have been remarkably stable.

But wait: “Danger, Mr. Robinson” (Imagine a robot with vacuum cleaner hoses for arms shouting a warning to all of us). Is it really that simple? Can I invest my resources with confidence that the price for my energy will remain constant? Should I hedge my bets by spending more on increased efficiency? What is the impact on my return on investment? Can I count on the availability of this energy source? Critical questions all, and questions we will address in this and subsequent articles.

What is Natural Gas?

Natural gas is a mix of a number of hydrocarbons with 80 to more than 90% methane (CH4) and lesser quantities of ethane(C2H6), propane(C3H8), heavier hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide (CO2) and/or nitrogen(N2). The composition varies depending on the source, but it averages a higher heating value (HHV) of around 1,000 British thermal units (BTU) per standard cubic foot (SCF). This fuel can be used directly to heat our equipment and is being used, in increasing quantities, to generate our electricity.

Domestic Production

Advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) have greatly expanded our domestic production of both oil and natural gas, releasing otherwise “tight” gas and oil previously trapped in shale formations. This has made recovering these sources of natural gas economically feasible. The supply of shale natural gas grew sevenfold in the last 15 years and now represents roughly two-thirds of our total domestic production of gas. (2005 shale gas production was less than 10 billion cubic feet per day to over 70 billion by 2020.)3 Furthermore, the Energy Information Agency (EIA) — an agency within the Department of Energy charged with tracking US energy production, consumption, and project future demand and supply– projects an increase in US domestic production through at least the year 2050.

Domestic Consumption

Natural Gas Use by Sectors in the US, 2019 and Change Since 20094

Total Consumption 2019    31 Trillion Cubic Feet

Total Consumption 2009        23 Trillion Cubic Feet

Efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from electrical power generation and reduce the cost of new generating capacity have led to a rapid expansion of electricity generated using our abundant supply of domestic natural gas. Switching from coal to natural gas reduces CO2 emissions by nearly 59% per unit of electricity generated. (See table “U.S. electric utility and independent power… by fuel 2019”)5 Noteworthy Trend – Electrical Power Generation

In the last 10 years, coal consumption for electricity generation has fallen 48% while natural gas’s contribution has gone up 60%.6 This investment in new natural gas fired electrical generating facilities has created a very stable demand. It is likely that this trend will continue as coal plants are shuttered in favor of the cheaper and cleaner natural gas alternative. In the long run, renewables, specifically solar and wind, may displace some of this natural gas consumption, but in the near term, coal is the most likely fuel to be displaced. The demand for electricity produced by natural gas will be buoyed further by the rapid expansion in the use of electric vehicles.

Exports – Liquified Natural Gas (LNG)

The US was a net exporter of LNG in 2017 and 2019. Our export capacity has expanded nine-fold from 2016 to 2019, growing from 0.36 trillion cubic feet per year in 2016 to 3.24 trillion cubic feet per year in 2019. As our capacity to export natural gas expands, it is likely that an increase in international demand will place upward pressure on domestic prices.

Externalities – The Unpredictable

There are factors that are, by their very nature, impossible to quantify. They remain a risk, nonetheless. As political power shifts in Washington, it is likely that politicians will pursue legislation to reduce CO2 emissions. The Biden administration, for example, could seek to reduce coal consumption by switching to natural gas as a means to generate electricity. Regulations or moratoriums on fracking might reduce our ability to expand production in the face of rising demand. The U.S. may seek to export more natural gas to reduce allies’ dependency on natural gas produced by our geopolitical rivals. On balance, the net effect of these political factors cannot be predicted and modeled with any certainty.

Other non-political factors make our future less clear. Weather remains a constant unknown and as natural gas’s share of electrical generation expands, both hot and cold weather can lead to an increase in demand. Furthermore, excessive speculation could also introduce instability to prices if not supply. Remember Enron and the effect on electrical power prices and supply in California in 2000 and 2001.

Conclusion

With any luck, we will see no national supply or demand shocks that will imperil the availability of natural gas for U..S industry. I am concerned that prices will rise and fluctuate as a result of one or more of the factors highlighted in this article. These risks should be considered when making equipment acquisition, maintenance, and operating decisions. In the upcoming articles, we will focus on technologies and practices that can help to mitigate these risks as well as save both energy and money.

 

 

 

 

Endnotes:

[1] “Natural gas explained: Factors affecting natural gas prices,” Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Energy Information Association. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/factors-affecting-natural-gas-prices.php.

[2] Ibid.

[3] “Natural gas explained: Where our natural gas comes from,” Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Energy Information Association. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/where-our-natural-gas-comes-from.php.

[4] “Natural gas explained: Use of natural gas,” Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Energy Information Association. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/use-of-natural-gas.php.

[5] “FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS): How much carbon dioxide is produced per kilowatthour of U.S. electricity generation?” Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Energy Information Association. https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=74&t=11.

[6] “Electric Power Monthly: Table 1.1. Net Generation by Energy Source: Total (All Sectors), 2010-October 2020,” Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Energy Information Association. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_1_01.

 

 

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Photo source: anaterate at pixabay.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combustion Corner: Natural Gas 101 Read More »

Natural Gas vs. Hydrogen Combustion: Reality or Hot Air? – Expert Analysis

OCFossil fuels. Are they detrimental to the environment? Are they past their prime? Is hydrogen what we should be talking about? Are there other technologies that should be capturing our attention?

Heat Treat Today and our good friends at heatprocessing, Europe’s leading heat treat magazine, sought outstanding U.S. and European experts in the energy field to answer and provide analysis about the state of natural gas and hydrogen combustion. This original content piece, edited by Karen Gantzer, managing editor at Heat Treat Today, appeared in the Heat Treat Today 2020 Medical & Energy December print edition. We hope you enjoy this Technical Tuesday.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electric

The following article highlights the insight of seven gentlemen in the heat treating industry, from both the U.S. and Europe, who work within the energy sector. We asked them for their responses to three questions regarding natural gas and hydrogen combustion. Our European colleagues also commented on whether hydrogen will be an important

factor in the heat treat industry in 10 years. There is a diversity of opinions among the experts, and it’s important to note how regional economics and resources may have impacted responses.

We hope you enjoy the analysis from our experts.

Where do you see the natural gas industry today? Where do you believe it will be in 10 years?

John B. Clarke, technical director at Helios Electric Corporation, a combustion consultancy in Fort Wayne, Indiana, shares how different his answer would have been if asked years ago about the state of natural gas: “Had you asked me 25 years ago, I would have described a market with a declining supply of natural gas resulting in rising costs. A market dominated by a drive to increase efficiency to control energy costs. That was then, but now we have an abundant (yet finite) supply of natural gas resulting in very low costs – and in the medium term, a market dominated by a drive to reduce emissions. Increased efficiency – both in the medium term and today – will reduce energy costs while at the same time reduce CO2 emissions.”

Clarke continues, “Given the prevalence of hydraulic fracturing, we can expect an expanding availability of natural gas, if the market price provides a sufficient return for the producers. The greatest disruption in the natural gas market will likely be on the consumption side as electrical power producers continue their shift away from coal to natural gas. While renewables will play a larger part, they cannot meet the requirement to provide continuous base load power to consumers.”

Dave Wolff
Region Sales Manager
Nel Hydrogen

Dave Wolff, region sales manager at Nel Hydrogen, a manufacturer of onsite hydrogen generation, agrees with Clarke on the budget friendly price of natural gas, and he also cautions that it’s a finite resource: “It is an amazing time to be a natural gas user. Natural gas has never been cheaper than it is today ($2.00/MMBTU range). But the super low pricing won’t last forever. It is critical to understand that natural gas reserves are a finite resource, and that at today’s pricing, most shale operations are losing money. The Energy Information Association (EIA) expects that natural gas pricing will go up 50% in 2021 versus 2020.”

Regarding the future, Wolff recommends, “. . . wind and solar energy are truly infinite energy sources. Unlike the volatile and unpredictable natural gas pricing chart, renewable electricity prices are on a steady downward trend... So, I would strongly advise people to test their investment decisions as to the varying picture for natural gas versus electric price predictions. Especially if buying furnaces, this is critical, since the lifetime cost of a furnace is overwhelmingly a function of energy.”

Keenan Cokain, global sales and applications coordinator and Michael Cochran, an applications engineer, both from Pittsburgh’s Bloom Engineering, an industrial combustion and controls company, add another consideration: “Natural gas is a vital primary energy source globally and will likely remain so over the next 10 years. Although energy demands will likely show an overall decline in 2020, over the next 10 years, global natural gas consumption will likely rise as it continues to grow in comparison to other fossil fuels (such as oil and coal) as a percentage of the global primary energy consumed.

"It is important to note that when combusted natural gas (methane) produces about 117 lbs. of carbon dioxide (CO2) per 1 million Btu released, this is lower than oil and coal which produces 164 lbs. and 208 lbs. of CO2 per 1 million Btu respectively. Given the fact that natural gas produces lower CO2 emissions compared to other common fossil fuels, some see it as a bridge fuel that could be used in greater amounts until other fuel sources with lower carbon dioxide footprints are developed."

Do our European colleagues share a similar view?

Dipl.-Ing. Gerd Waning
Market Development
Metallurgy Heat Treatment
Linde GmbH

Dipl.-Ing. Gerd Waning, market development in Metallurgy Heat Treatment at Linde GmbH, a global industrial gases and engineering company, states, “Due to the excellently developed natural gas infrastructure in many European countries, natural gas is today probably the best established energy source in industry and households with a high level of acceptance in terms of environmental friendliness and safety.”

In regard to decarbonization, the removal of hydrocarbons from combustion, Waning shares, “In connection with the strongly accelerated decarbonization of industrial and energy production in Europe, it can be assumed that the share of natural gas in the overall energy business will initially increase through 2030. The scheduled shutdown of coal and nuclear power plants (in Germany) will not be able to be compensated by renewable energy sources during this period, so the deficits in the in-house production of electricity will have to be partially compensated by natural gas.”

Dr.-Ing. Michael Severin
Business Field Manager Process Heat
Karl Dungs GmbH & Co. KG

Dr.-Ing. Michael Severin, business field manager, Process Heat, at Karl Dungs GmbH & Co. KG, a supplier for combustion controls components and system solutions for heating burners, boilers, process heat, and gas engines, introduces climate-neutrality and digitalization to the conversation. “The natural gas industry, with its conservative requirements, is challenged by modern demands for climate-neutrality and digitalization. I believe in 10 years we will have proven that combustion and climate-neutrality are not contradictory, and that safety and security can be boosted by intelligent systems. However, in 10 years these examples will still be pilot projects, with a growing infrastructure and the broad transition happening gradually.”

Lars Böhmer
Managing Director
Research Association for Industrial Furnace Construction (FOGI) within VDMA Metallurgy

.

.

Lars Böhmer, managing director at the Research Association for Industrial Furnace Construction (FOGI) within VDMA Metallurgy, a joint platform of metallurgical machinery producers in Europe, believes the changes that are coming are necessary and will not be a surprise to the natural gas industry. “So, all stakeholders, suppliers as well as users, are in dialogue regarding possible solutions,” explains Böhmer.

Regarding the future, Böhmer states, “The market in 10 years’ time will certainly be a different one than today, and you don’t have to be a prophet to say that alternative fuels will play a greater role than they are currently. Whether these alternative fuels will then be used 100% or as a blend may well depend on many regional, but also technical, parameters.”

What do you perceive to be the eventual move from fossil fuels to hydrogen-based fuels? Why the move away from fossil fuels?

There is a consensus among our experts that reducing carbon dioxide emissions is a universal desire and that the burden to accomplish this goal lies within countries around the world. What is fascinating are the various options they provide to replace the carbon-based fuels.

Cokain and Cochran, from Bloom Engineering, share their thoughts on generating hydrogen on an industrial scale and viable next steps. They say, “The most common way to generate hydrogen today on an industrial scale is through a process called steam-methane reforming. During this process natural gas (methane) and steam are combined under pressure with catalysts in a twostep process to produce carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen (H2). Once the carbon dioxide is removed, one is left with pure hydrogen that can be used as a carbon-free fuel source. The downside to steam-methane reforming is that by the time the steam is produced and the carbon stripped from the natural gas, the resulting carbon dioxide emissions can be on the order of 40% more per unit of fuel energy produced than would have resulted from the direct combustion of natural gas. This means that without being coupled with carbon capture and store (CCS) – capturing the CO2 before it leaves the plant – a move to hydrogen based fuels generated using today’s most common methods of hydrogen production would result in an increase of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere.”

The Bloom team continues, “Other methods of producing hydrogen that would not result in increased generation of carbon dioxide are currently being developed. One such method would be electrolysis or the use of electricity to decompose water into hydrogen and oxygen. If the electric for such a process were generated using renewable or ‘carbon neutral’ sources, then the carbon penalty associated with hydrogen production could be eliminated.”

Nel Hydrogen’s Wolff contends, “It seems straightforward that forever energy sources are going to be less expensive in the long run than finite ones. No matter what your environmental politics, the facts are that finite resources go up in price as supply shrinks relative to demand.”

“Hydrogen for the heat treat industry is unlikely to be used as a fuel – it is used as an atmosphere component, with diluents such as nitrogen or argon, and with carbon-contributors such as methanol or even methane itself,” Wolff continues. “Long-term, we at Nel expect that hydrogen produced on-site will be the predominant hydrogen-containing atmosphere approach.”

Clarke of Helios Electrical Corporation is a believer in battery technology, “The movement from coal to natural gas is, in essence, a move from full carbon to a carbon/hydrogen fuel. As for pure hydrogen fuel cells, there may be new technology that drives the costs down, but my bet is that battery technology advancement will push fuel cells from most applications.”

While the economic impact on the infrastructure to build thousands of recharging stations will surely be a consideration for the future of electric cars, Clarke says, “I believe we will see an accelerated movement to electric vehicles. Battery technology has reached a point where the range of these vehicles are acceptable for an increasing number of consumers.” Clarke continues, “This will move consumption from gasoline and other petroleum- based fuels but may increase demand for natural gas for power generation.”

“In the end,” Clarke explains, “it always comes down to economics – cost of new equipment, cost of operating, and cost of regulation. I believe current users of fossil fuel heating equipment in the industry can expect the cost of equipment and regulations to increase. More efficient technology with heat recovery will cost more to purchase and install, and we can expect regulatory compliance costs to increase. As for cost of operating the equipment, I am optimistic that decreased energy consumption might offset increased energy costs.”

Karl Dungs GmbH & Co.’s Severin shares two options for transitioning to include hydrogen in a combustion system: “Hydrogen as a chemical energy carrier makes green electric power storable and utilizable for industries where large amounts of heat and high temperatures are required. Infrastructure and gas systems can be used with hydrogen with minor adaptations to the combustion system. For the transition, there are two possible ways. Either hydrogen is blended into natural gas networks and the ratio will be ramped up over the years. Or, parallel hydrogen networks will be created, which supply particular plants with 100% hydrogen now and will then grow and spread into the rest of the industry over the years. The determination between these scenarios is hard to foresee at the moment, but I personally see a trend towards the latter.”

Böhmer, of VDMA, knows there are field tests with fuel/gas mixtures containing 20% hydrogen, however he thinks we’ll see “an intermediate step of about 60% hydrogen, since there is little experience beyond this value. The question that plays a big role regarding this topic is, ‘How much hydrogen, which is produced by means of renewable energy, will be available at all?’”

Waning, from Linde GmbH, addresses the longevity of furnace systems and new systems versus conversions: “Due to the long service life of heat treatment systems, there will be only a few systems built exclusively for hydrogen as a heating medium. The technological feasibility of converting from natural gasfired systems to hydrogen-fired systems or a mixture of natural gas and hydrogen (50/50) is only just beginning to be researched on an industrial scale, whereas the conversion of the infrastructure to high hydrogen concentrations is considered manageable. However, this changeover should not be critical, particularly in the case of heat treatment systems that are fired with closed radiant heating tubes due to their protective atmosphere operation."

Should captive heat treaters be talking about hydrogen or are there other technologies they should be focusing on?

Linde GmbH’s Waning states that there are no significant differences between contract heat treaters and in-house heat treaters because of the comparable systems used by both. However, he does encourage us to focus on the period after 2023. He says, “Here it becomes clear how strongly development depends on current local political action. France, for example, continues to consistently focus on expanding the use of electricity. Here the heat treatment company is well advised to operate electrically heated systems if they want to minimize their CO2 footprint. Paired with nitrogen-methanol or hydrogen as a protective gas from green sources, a heat treatment process with the lowest CO2 emissions can be created.”

“In Germany,” Waning continues, “the picture is completely different. The move away from coal and nuclear power towards renewable energies led to the recently adopted German hydrogen strategy. There is no getting around the increasing use of hydrogen as a combustion medium, as the regulations for a massive expansion of the electrical networks in Germany lead to extremely long implementation times. While the same must be said here for the protective atmosphere side as for France and all other countries, the heat treatment company in Germany should consider being able to react flexibly to the actual conditions with hybrid heating (electric + gas).”

Severin, from Karl Dungs GmbH & Co., talks about biogas: “Biogas can have the same CO2 -neutral balance as hydrogen and has a better availability in many regions nowadays. However, biogas will always be a very limited resource and will not be able to serve a whole industry segment. Other climate-neutral fuels, like synthetic methane or higher hydrocarbons, always involve a loss in overall efficiency. In the long run, I only see hydrogen as a feasible and comprehensive solution for green combustion technology.”

VDMA’s Böhmer cautions against thinking that hydrogen is the silver bullet to solve the climate challenges: “In my opinion, considering hydrogen as the one and only solution to climate problems would be the wrong way to go. Hydrogen is one of several possible solutions, although it has already turned out to play a very important role against the background of the already mentioned storage possibilities of regeneratively produced energy. But it also has to be taken into account that the hydrogen, be it as combustion gas or as basis for further conversions, has to be available everywhere it is needed and in the required quantities.”

Böhmer also reminds us there are possible solutions in the world of synthetically produced fuels that are not exclusively hydrogen-based. In fact, “in the aviation industry, the use of sustainable kerosene from ‘power-to-liquid’ plants is not only being discussed but is already being tested. So, the fuel of the future does not necessarily have to be only gaseous, and actually there are many different approaches and efforts to reach the targets.”

To the heat treater, Böhmer emphasizes that electric heating, i.e., inductive hardening, “must not be missing. It can be assumed that the share of electrical heat treatment will increase, as the use of pure or blended hydrogen as fuel gas may be critical, depending on the process and material.”

Helios Electrical Corporation’s Clarke doesn’t believe hydrogen as a heating technology is a viable option. He says, “Obviously, hydrogen as an atmosphere will continue to be used. Burning hydrogen to generate heat is more problematic – heat transfer from the flame to the work being heated (or inside of a radiant tube) is a function of radiation and convection. The hydrogen flame will lack much of the luminosity we have come to expect when burning CH4. The change in luminosity will alter the heat transfer mechanism, providing greater heat flux over a smaller area. Hydrogen also has a very high flame propagation rate.” He mentions the cost of producing and transporting hydrogen must enter into the equation.

Clarke continues, “As an industry, we still have a great deal of energy that can be extracted from the exhaust products of natural gas-fired equipment.” Although he points out that “current economics make the deployment of more advanced technology to capture and reuse this heat unattractive in many cases,” he expects “the cost of natural gas and/or the demand of regulations may very well change this equation in the 10-year time frame.” (In North America, unfortunately, mandated regulatory compliance may be the only viable adaptation of this technology.)

One last opportunity that Clarke mentions is “the efficiency gains that result from improving equipment maintenance, adjusting fuel/air ratios to reduce excess air, cleaning heat transfer surfaces, and maintaining combustion chambers at the optimum pressure to decrease tramp air. Deploying new technology is like a football team hiring a star quarterback. He is not too valuable if the team ignores basic blocking and tackling.”

Bloom Engineering’s Cokain and Cochran think the response from captive heaters may very well be dictated by the area in which they do business, as discussed earlier. “In some places, the goal of reducing carbon dioxide emissions at the point of use could outweigh the fact that hydrogen generation, specifically using steam-methane reforming (SMR) which is most common today, often carries a carbon penalty and is more costly compared to the direct combustion of natural gas. Unless hydrogen production, specifically through SMR coupled with carbon capture and store (CCS), can be made more cost effective, heat treaters in these carbon-regulated areas may want to consider electrification if their process permits.”

They continue, “Unlike some other pollutants that have a largely localized effect, carbon dioxide (CO2) is expected to make the same contribution to global climate change regardless of where it is released. As a result, decarbonization regulations would need to be applied globally to be effective. Otherwise, heat processing industries will likely shift away from regulated regions due to the cost advantages of operating in unregulated areas and continue to add CO2 to the atmosphere.”

And lastly, the Bloom team advises this approach, “Today, the best way for captive heat treaters to minimize carbon dioxide emissions would be to maximize process efficiency and minimize energy use. In other words, burn less fuel and use less electric. For any process that relies on the combustion of fossil fuels, an increase in efficiency that results in a net reduction of fuel burned will proportionally reduce carbon dioxide emissions. One possible way to increase efficiency in a combustion process would be to recover heat from that process’s waste gases through the use of a recuperator or regenerative burner technology. These types of technologies can greatly increase efficiency, but they must be carefully applied since they are not compatible with all combustion processes.”

How important will hydrogen be for the heat treatment industry in 10 years?

Our European experts share their thoughts on the role of hydrogen in the heat treat industry in the next decade.

Waning of Linde GmbH suggests, “Many heat treatment processes that are currently operated with carbon-containing protective atmospheres could alternatively also be operated with very high hydrogen contents. From the current state of technological knowledge, it is mainly atmospheric carburization systems that require a significant proportion of carbon monoxide in the atmosphere in order to be able to operate economically. (Such processes can, however, also be operated with a low CO2 footprint if they are operated with nitrogenmethanol from renewable sources.)”

“Assuming a high availability of inexpensive hydrogen, many operators would opt for the protective gas with the higher hydrogen content, especially since this would result in other significant advantages in terms of furnace life and cleanliness of the systems and quenching medium,” states Waning. “On balance, it can therefore be assumed that in the future there will be a higher hydrogen demand in the heat treatment industry for the protective gas sector alone.”

Karl Dungs GmbH & Co.’s Severin responds, “This depends highly on the regional availability, national regulations, and subsidies. I see local ‘valleys’ of hydrogen grids, with the heat treatment industry being one of the drivers to demand a carbon-neutral energy source, where electrification is not possible. Cost is the main obstacle for this option, so cost reduction in international supply chains, infrastructure, and applications with large consumption is key. In 10 years, this won’t be achieved fully, and hydrogen solutions will still be more expensive than natural gas combustion.”

“Hydrogen will certainly play a greater role for the heat treatment industry than it does today,” states Böhmer, of VDMA. “Regardless of whether pure hydrogen, a natural gashydrogen blend or synthetic natural gas produced by methanization is used in the combustion processes; the fact is that hydrogen will play an important and decisive role as fuel-gas for combustion processes. In this context, the possibility of storing energy by means of hydrogen should not be forgotten in energy-intensive fields such as the heat treatment industry.”

Böhmer concludes, “Nevertheless, it also has to be taken into consideration that there may be a possible influence of hydrogen not only on the burner and the fuel supply regarding choice of materials and safety-procedures, but especially on the material to be treated. Therefore, a possible conversion of hydrogen into synthetic gases must be considered in some cases. It goes without saying that the efficiency and costs play a decisive role in this context.”

 

 

 

For more information, contact the experts:

  1. John B. Clarke, Technical Director, Helios Electric Corporation: jclarke@helios-corp.com
  2. Keenan Cokain Global Sales and Applications Coordinator, Bloom Engineering: kcokain@bloomeng.com
  3. Michael Cochran, Applications Engineer, Bloom Engineering: mcochran@bloomeng.com
  4. Dave Wolff, Region Sales Manager, Nel Hydrogen: dwolff@nelhydrogen.com
  5. Dipl.-Ing. Gerd Waning, Market Development Metallurgy Heat Treatment, Linde GmbH: gerd.waning@linde.com
  6. Dr.-Ing. Michael Severin, Business Field Manager Process Heat, Karl Dungs GmbH & Co. KG: m.severin@dungs.com
  7. Lars Böhmer, Managing Director, Research Association for Industrial Furnace, Construction (FOGI) within VDMA Metallurgy: lars.boehmer@vdma.org

Natural Gas vs. Hydrogen Combustion: Reality or Hot Air? – Expert Analysis Read More »

Heat Treat Tips: How to Install an Ammonia System

During the day-to-day operation of heat treat departments, many habits are formed and procedures followed that sometimes are done simply because that’s the way they’ve always been done. One of the great benefits of having a community of heat treaters is to challenge those habits and look at new ways of doing things. Heat Treat Today101 Heat Treat Tips, tips and tricks that come from some of the industry’s foremost experts, were initially published in the FNA 2018 Special Print Edition, as a way to make the benefits of that community available to as many people as possible. This special edition is available in a digital format here.

In today’s Technical Tuesday, we continue an intermittent series of posts drawn from the 101 tips. The category for this post is Industrial Gases, and today’s tip #39 comes from Dan Herring, “The Heat Treat Doctor®”, of The Herring Group. 


Heat Treat Tip #39

How to Install an Ammonia System

Dan Herring,  “The Heat Treat Doctor®”, of The Herring Group

One of the keys to any successful ammonia system installation in the heat treat shop is to find a supplier who is capable of providing premium grade (also known as metallurgical grade) anhydrous ammonia. This product has little or no water, which could contaminate your process. Look for a specification of 99.995% ammonia.

Once you have picked a supplier, there are several choices when it comes to ammonia storage. For the lowest product price, you should consider a tank of at least 10,000 gallons (43,000 pounds of ammonia.) This allows you to purchase full 38,000-pound tanker trucks of ammonia to reduce your supply costs. One pound of ammonia yields 22.5 cubic feet of vapor or 45 cubic feet of dissociated ammonia (75% H2, 25% N2).

In most states, you must comply with these standards if you have more than 10,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia on site. So, you need to make sure you comply with OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) and EPA’s Risk Management Plan (RMP).

The second option is to keep below the 10,000-pound threshold by installing a 1,000 gallon (4,400-pound capacity) or a 2,000 gallon (8,800-pound capacity) storage tank. Pricing for ammonia into these tanks runs about 50% higher in the smaller quantities. Even with the lower inventory, you will need to comply with OSHA 1910.111 and any applicable state, city, or county laws. It is critical to check with local agencies to make sure you are in full compliance with these regulations.

Another option for smaller usages are ammonia cylinders, but if stored inside the factory, special containment cabinets are required. Check with your ammonia supplier for the details.

With regard to the installation, in most cases, you need to pour a foundation for the tank, provide electricity to the tank for a sidearm vaporizer (used to maintain pressure in the tank since you will be withdrawing ammonia vapor to the process) and provide piping from the tank to your process. Most suppliers can lease the tank and valves/attachments for a nominal monthly fee depending on your ammonia consumption. You can also add a telemetry unit that allows your supplier to monitor your tank level via an Internet site. You will need to install a water shower near the tank and have gas masks close to the tank. It is a good idea to provide a fence around the tank if your company does not have security. Your supplier should provide hazardous awareness training for ammonia.

You can expect relatively trouble-free operation from a properly installed and well-maintained ammonia supply. Maintenance problems, other than an occasional paint job, are usually minimal but good inspection (including all valving) and frequent leak checks are mandatory. The tank should be visually inspected yearly, probably by your supplier, and the pressure relief valves should be changed every five years.

Submitted by The Herring Group

Photo credit: Video Stock Footage from QuickStock.com


If you have any questions, feel free to contact the expert who submitted the Tip or contact Heat Treat Today directly. If you have a heat treat tip that you’d like to share, please send to the editor, and we’ll put it in the queue for our next Heat Treat Tips issue. 

Heat Treat Tips: How to Install an Ammonia System Read More »

Furnace Gas Composition Controlled with CO and CO2

 

Source: AZO Sensors

 

 

Many heat treat processes require protective or process gases. These gases often require careful monitoring. One of the protective and/or process gases used in many heat treat applications is an endothermic atmosphere which is made up largely of CO, CO2, H2, and N2. This article is about the creation and proper monitoring of endothermic atmospheres.

In an atmosphere furnace, the proper mix of these gases can help facilitate changes in the metal such as proper hardness and strength, resistance to temperature, or improved tensile strength to mention a few. Without careful control of temperature, time and atmosphere, metals can experience unwanted changes in properties such as hydrogen embrittlement, surface bluing, soot formation, oxidation, and decarburization. With such critical outcomes in the balance, it is necessary to control the endothermic gas.

An excerpt:

“In order for the required metal treatment to be a success, you must control and monitor the gas composition with extreme care. The concentrations of gases, CO₂, H₂O, CH₄, N₂, H₂ and CO, that make up the endothermic gas atmosphere should be measured in order to aid the prevention of unwanted reactions and ensure that the endogas generator and the furnace are operating normally.”

 

Read more: “CO and CO2 Control of Endothermic Gas in Heat Treatment Furnaces”

Furnace Gas Composition Controlled with CO and CO2 Read More »

Off-Gas Process Control, Water Detection Technologies Ordered by Indiana Steel Producer

 

A global company providing steel plant and metals industry equipment and services, including heat treating, was recently selected by an Indiana-based steel producer to install and implement its proprietary off-gas process control and water detection technologies.

 Steel Dynamics Inc., at Pittsboro, Indiana, is the second SDI plant to place an order for Tenova’s combined technologies. With this order, SDI Pittsboro will install Tenova’s hybrid extractive/laser NextGen® off-gas analysis system, iEAF® dynamic process control system and Water Detection Technology® (WDT®) as a fully integrated solution on the plant’s 100 ton AC EAF, providing SDI Pittsboro with the world’s most comprehensive technology package of off-gas based EAF process control technology.

Tenova’s technological package combines EAF process automation, thermodynamic models, process hardware, innovative temperature/velocity sensor technology, and water detection.

NextGen® is a hybrid laser/extractive off-gas analysis hardware system that delivers faster analytical response times, requires minimal maintenance and reduces hardware and installation costs.  NextGen® enables the operator to monitor and control furnace conditions helping to mitigate operational risk.

iEAF® Modules 1, 2 and 3 use NextGen off-gas analysis plus Tenova’s proprietary optical off-gas temperature & flow sensors, a link to the plant’s PLC network and a real-time mass & energy balance to dynamically control and optimize chemical energy & electricity consumption  and improve endpoint control to maximize operating cost savings, reduce electrode consumption, increase yield and reduce power on time.  .

 

Off-Gas Process Control, Water Detection Technologies Ordered by Indiana Steel Producer Read More »

Matching Gases with Vacuum Heat Treatment Operations

 

Source: VAC AERO International

 

Relative Gas Supply Cost Notes: [a] Based on a minimum usage of 2830 cubic meters (100,000 cubic feet) per month. [b] All gases compared to nitrogen whose relative cost is unity. [c] Based on liquid supply.
Heat treaters use a variety of gases with vacuum furnaces during the processing cycle in partial pressure operation, for backfilling to atmospheric pressure at the end of the processing cycle, and for cooling/quenching. In this article, VAC AERO describes the most common of these gases — (in order of frequency of use) nitrogen, argon, hydrogen and helium — as well as other common gases such as various hydrocarbons and ammonia (for vacuum carburizing/carbonitriding) and specialty gases such as neon (for certain electronics applications), and analyzes their uses and value in various vacuum heat treating processes. In addition, their relative cost per 100,000 cubic feet, the liquid properties and physical properties of common backfill gases, and the conversion between common pressure and vacuum units are explored.

Read more: “Types of Backfill, Partial Pressure, and Cooling Gases for Vacuum Heat Treatment”

 

Matching Gases with Vacuum Heat Treatment Operations Read More »