OP-ED

The “Known – Unknown”: Preparing Your Facility for Unpredictable World Events

op-edThe “Known – Unknown,” the “Undiscovered Country,” the “Movement from cocksure ignorance to thoughtful uncertainty.” It doesn’t matter if you get your catch phrase from Donald Rumsfeld, Star-Trek, or that plaque your mother kept above the kitchen sink, the implication is the same: we really don’t know what the future holds. But, the Unknown of which I speak in this article is natural gas prices.

This column is a Combustion Corner feature written by John Clarke, technical director at Helios Electric Corporation, and appeared in Heat Treat Today’s March 2022 Aerospace print edition.

If you have suggestions for savings opportunities you’d like John to explore for future columns, please email Karen@heattreattoday.com.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electric Corporation
Source: Helios Electrical Corporation

Does “What happens in Eastern Europe stays in Eastern Europe” hold true? Unfortunately — no.

We have learned from recent and ongoing supply chain issues just how interconnected our economy and manufacturing sector is with the rest of the world. The standoff in Ukraine has the potential to impact the world energy markets for years to come, and I suspect this impact will be felt no matter what transpires. I am certainly no expert, but I have a sinking suspicion that our country offered some American methane molecules to Germany to stiffen their resolve to cancel the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. If the EU works to reduce their dependency on Russian natural gas, a significant portion of worldwide exports are removed from the supply side of the equation. From a practical standpoint, these shifts in supply will take some years to achieve, but we have seen a new realization on the part of business and governmental leaders about the importance of robust and reliable supplies of commodities, and manufactured goods and manufacturing capacity. So, less natural gas supply with rising demand equates to higher prices. And as we have discussed previously, liquefied natural gas transportation from the U.S. to the rest of the world is connecting our natural gas market with the world market — and our natural gas price will be affected by consumption and production factors worldwide, just as the price we pay for petroleum oil today is determined in New York, London, and Riyadh — following the consumption patterns in Beijing, Sydney, and Tokyo.

Ok — let’s get back to what we can do in our own facilities to insulate ourselves, to some degree, from unpredictable world events.

Recuperation, or preheating combustion air using the waste heat exiting the furnace or oven is a time proven method to reduce fuel gas consumption. Before we quantify the effect of preheating air, we need to briefly discuss what affects this heated air has on the combustion process. Higher combustion air temperatures are associated with the following:

  1. Peak flame temperatures are increased. As less energy is used to heat the incoming air, the energy in the natural gas can raise the products of combustion (CO2, H2O and N2) to a higher temperature than would be achieved without combustion air preheating. This can be either beneficial or problematic for a specific application. If the work being heated can accept increased radiation from these higher temperatures — heating rates are improved and throughput increased, but these higher temperatures may reduce the life of furnace components, or, in extreme cases, lead to a catastrophic failure.
  2. Flame speeds are increased, so the combustion process concludes in less space. Again, this is a double-edged sword, benefiting some and leading to a loss on temperature uniformity in others.
  3. Total products of combustion required for any quantity of heat input is reduced. Mass flow is especially important in systems where the operating temperature is below approximately 1200°F. If the energy saved leads to a loss in temperature uniformity, it may be a Pyrrhic victory.
  4. NOx formation is increased. Burner technology has come a long way in recent years to allow for systems to use these higher temperatures without greatly increasing NOx emissions, but the rule of thumb is that by increasing the combustion air temperature from 70°F to 800°F, we basically double NOx formation.

Each of these drawbacks, other than NOx formation, may be a plus rather than a minus for any application. Float glass furnaces (plate glass used in windows) and ingot reheat furnaces are examples of applications where recuperation was applied a century or so ago, at a time where fuel costs where not much of a factor. In both cases, the increased flame temperatures accelerated the heat transfer to either the glass or the steel, increasing production. These applications required furnace temperatures where combustion without preheating would have been impractical — as most of the energy would have been lost in the flues, and very little heat would be available to do any useful work.

What questions should I ask? How much can I save? What is my project’s estimated payback? All are critical questions. To start with, can your existing furnace accept these higher flame temperatures, and can you capture the heat and apply a cost-effective heat exchanger? An example would be a radiant tube furnace. Applying recuperation may require an upgrade in the alloy used in the burner and radiant tube. In direct fired applications, will my uniformity suffer? In general, this is a greater concern at temperatures below 1600°F. As the operating temperatures increase, we can generally expect better uniformity. (I can hear the furnace and burner experts reading this cry “foul,” and they are right, it is not wise to rely on my generalizations — always consult an expert about your specific application.)

How much will it cost? With recuperation, it is best to take advantage of an experienced person’s mistakes, rather than making them on your own. Consult a qualified contractor, OEM, or consultant to help with the application and costs.

How much can be saved? To answer that question, I provide the above graph. It is not the end all be all but will provide a rough estimate of potential savings. It is for an application with an exhaust temperature of 1600°F operating with 15% excess air.

As we can see, in this application, if we apply recuperation to preheat the air to 800°F, we will save 28% of the natural gas we would otherwise consume.

Before investing your money, an individual analysis of each application is required. This article’s purpose is simply to motivate the reader to invest the time necessary to properly determine, as I mentioned last month, if they have “uncashed checks” lying around their shop.

As always, please let me know if you have any questions.

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.


Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com


 

The “Known – Unknown”: Preparing Your Facility for Unpredictable World Events Read More »

Are You Holding on to Uncashed Checks?

op-ed

To not invest money in worthwhile projects makes as much sense as not depositing your paycheck. In this column, we will briefly look at energy and gas “checks” you might have received in the mail but have yet to cash.

This column is a Combustion Corner feature written by John Clarke, technical director at Helios Electric Company, and appeared in Heat Treat Today’s February 2022 Air & Atmosphere Furnace Systems print edition.

If you have suggestions for savings opportunities you’d like John to explore for future columns, please email Karen@heattreattoday.com.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electric Corporation
Source: Helios Electrical Corporation

The late Fred Schoeneborn, a long-time energy consultant and friend, described energy savings opportunities that have been identified but not exploited as uncashed checks. To expand on Fred’s metaphor, not to look for opportunities to save natural gas is the equivalent of not collecting and opening your mail.

A furnace or oven is a box that contains the work being processed and the heat used in the process. It is an imperfect box because we are always losing heat. While it is imperfect, there are often opportunities to improve your oven’s performance, saving energy and generally improving quality. (You may notice if you have read a few of my columns, energy savings and quality improvements nearly always coexist.)

At the start of this series, we asked several questions. This time we will consider the following:

  1. Is my furnace or oven at the correct internal pressure?
  2. Is it time to rebuild door jams?
  3. How much fuel is wasted because I am not containing heat within the furnace or letting excessive air reduce my combustion efficiency?

Furnace pressure (in a non-vacuum application) is the simple function of the volume of the material introduced vs. the area of all the openings in our box. The obvious inputs are the products of combustion for direct fired systems, or the atmosphere for indirect systems.

What is the optimum pressure for my system? In general, the best pressure is the lowest pressure at which no tramp or unwanted air can enter the system and contaminate the atmosphere or upset the temperature uniformity. The lower the pressure, the less chance we will have excessive losses around door seals or other furnace penetrations. Most commonly, these pressures are measured in the hundredths or tenths of inches of water column.

In many applications, door sealing surfaces or jams take quite a beating. Their maintenance is expensive in terms of money, labor, and lost production. Expensive, yes, but the cost of NOT maintaining these surfaces may be much more. Losses are a result of radiant and convective losses, but most significantly, product quality because of atmosphere contamination or areas of the furnace not reaching setpoint temperature. When should we maintain these surfaces? In general, the best results I have observed are people who schedule surface maintenance periodically based on wear and available furnace downtime.

Calculating the savings from these fuel savings is more difficult, but in general, maintaining a consistently uniform interior work area saves more than the energy conserved.

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

Are You Holding on to Uncashed Checks? Read More »

Merry Christmas from Heat Treat Today

We will be celebrating the holidays with family, so look for your next Heat Treat Daily on January 3rd.

2021 has been a transformative year! Because we love people and 2021 saw the return of in-person, face-to-face events, seeing you in and around the trade show halls has been our #1 memory from 2021! What a joy to see and talk with so many of you.

In 2022, we’re looking forward to keeping you well informed by sharing relevant and compelling technical content, industry news, and innovative trends in the North American heat treat industry.

We are thankful for you and here’s our year-end prayer for you and yours, “May you experience the peace and hope that only Christ can give. Wishing you the joy of the Lord as we celebrate the birth of the Savior.”

- The Heat Treat Today Team

Merry Christmas from Heat Treat Today Read More »

How to Lower the Cost of Operating Your Burner System

We continue to consider the topic of natural gas pricing and reduction and its impact on heat treaters. Much of the discussion in this month’s article initially appears to deal with process quality or consistency. But understand, process consistency and energy savings are inextricably linked.

This Technical Tuesday column appeared in Heat Treat Today’s December 2021 Medical and Energy print editionJohn Clarke is the technical director at  Helios Electric Corporation and has written about combustion related topics throughout 2021 for Heat Treat Today.

In February 2022, we will continue this series. Please forward any questions or suggestions to our editor Karen@heattreattoday.com.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electric Corporation
Source: Helios Electrical Corporation

No matter what method we pursue to save natural gas, it is safe to assume it will require some investment — time and/or materials. Furthermore, we want a payback from this investment. To calculate the payback, we need to estimate the cost of the project as well as the value of the natural gas saved. We can generally nail down the cost of a project by obtaining quotes for materials and labor, but it is more difficult to know what the future cost of natural gas will be; and without knowing the savings, the payback is at best an educated guess.

As we have discussed in previous articles, demand for North American natural gas is increasing for electrical power generation as well as liquified natural gas (LNG) export to areas in the world with limited supplies. These are steady, predictable demands and less susceptible to seasonal variations in temperature. Less heating demand during warmer winters is generally offset by greater electrical power generating demands during warmer summers.

Let us revisit recent trends in the cost of natural gas. The graph below depicts the spot price for 22 consecutive trading days ending November 2, 2021.

Figure 1. Henry Hub price for natural gas

Beware of the displaced origin on the graph below — it makes the fluctuations in the spot price appear greater than they are, but it is done to indicate a range of prices — generally around $5.50/mmBTU. (Once again, neither the author nor Heat Treat Today presents the opinion of future prices for any purpose other than to further our discussions of energy saving project paybacks.)

Last month, we posed three questions:

  1. How do I know when the material I am heating is at the desired temperature?
  2. Do I have excessive factors of safety built into my process to compensate for not knowing the temperature at the core of the part being heated?
  3. How much fuel can I save with a shorter cycle?

Much of the discussion in this month’s article initially appears to deal with process quality or consistency. But understand, process consistency and energy savings are inextricably linked.

What temperature is my furnace or oven?

You walk up to the controls and read 1650°F. Is that the temperature of your oven? The answer is a definite “maybe” because the temperature displayed on a single loop temperature controller is simply the reflection of the small voltage generated by one thermocouple. This is obvious, or else we wouldn’t need to run temperature surveys. But the question is — do we have to live with this shortcoming? The answer to this question is a definite “no”! Modern control instrumentation makes it easy to use many thermocouples to sense the temperature of the furnace throughout the chamber. Then take the mean of these values to calculate the temperature and use this average value for the input to our temperature control loop. By comparing the readings of temperatures at various points in the furnace chamber, we can sense if all the work being heated is near to the desired setpoint.

No furnace load is perfect — there is always some non-uniformity of mass or surface area. With multiple sensing points, the more massive and slower to heat portion of the load will influence the nearest thermocouple. The furnace control can be designed to hold until the coolest thermocouple in the chamber reaches some minimum temperature. Perhaps this is now the trigger for a soak timer.

In addition to measuring multiple chamber temperatures and inferring the actual temperature of the work, the proportional integral derivative, or PID, temperature control algorithm provides a good deal of insight as to how close the work is to the desired furnace temperature. All PID controllers or programmed functions provide an output value. For our discussions, we will assume the output is between 0-100%. This output is used to control the heating element(s) of burners’ input levels. The advantage of the PID loop is that it calculates the required value more rapidly than a conventional on/off control — providing us the near steady values for our furnace temperatures.

Let’s imagine we adjust the temperature setpoint of our empty furnace to 1650°F. We will allow it to come to temperature and wait an hour until it is soaked out, so that the refractory and internal components are at some steady state temperature. The PID loop will settle to some average value; we will assume this value is 35%, which represents the holding consumption of the furnace. The heat entering the furnace is in equilibrium with the heat being lost through the refractory, up the flue, around the door, etc.

Now we load the furnace with 4000 pounds of thick steel parts, where the mass/surface area ratio is very high. The furnace thermocouple(s) will reach 1650°F in one hour; but, if we look at the PID loop output, it will take time for it to fall to 35%. The time between the indicated 1650°F and the output falling to 35% is a period when the work continues to absorb heat and conduct it to its core. When the output stabilizes at 35%, we know the work is soaked out at temperature — in other words, the surface and core of the parts are at the furnace setpoint temperature.

Do I have excessive factors of safety built into my process to compensate for not knowing the temperature at the core of the part being heated?

With added insight into the actual temperature of the work being heated, excessive soak times can be reduced without risk. It also allows for the running of light and heavy loads with the same program.

How much fuel can I save with a shorter cycle?

Building on the same hypothetical; assume the input to this furnace is 4,000,000 BTU/Hr and 1,000 hours are saved per year — the savings will be roughly 4,000,000 BTU/Hr x 0.35 (holding consumption) x $5.50/mmBTU x 1,000 Hours per year, or $7,700/year. Now, perform this modification on four furnaces. Add to this savings the increased confidence that the work is at temperature before the soak period is initiated, better consistency for varying part loading, and I think we can agree — we have a project. The only question is, will we cash the check?

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

How to Lower the Cost of Operating Your Burner System Read More »

Message from the Editor: Firsts

OCLet's talk about "firsts" and the importance of starting new adventures in the heat treat industry. From her editorial perspective, Karen Gantzer, editor of Heat Treat Today, shares her experience meeting the patient, informative experts in the heat treat industry in today's original content article. Where will your next "first" take you?

This article first appeared in Heat Treat Today's November 2021 Vacuum Furnaces print edition. Feel free to contact Karen Gantzer at karen@heattreattoday.com if you have a question, comment, or any editorial contribution you’d like to submit.


Karen Gantzer
Managing Editor
Heat Treat Today

In January of 2019, our publisher and close family friend, Doug Glenn (Doug, his wife Mary, and I go all the way back to our days at Grove City College), called me, a middle school English teacher, and asked me if I’d consider working for them as an editor. While I was honored that they would think of me, my initial response was something like, “Doug, I don’t know anything about heat treating and besides, I’m a humanities girl, not STEM!” He assured me that I could learn the industry and it would be a fun ride. A first for me to dip my toes into STEM waters!

Well, fast forward to present day, having just passed my second year with the Heat Treat Today team, I can truly attest that it has been an exciting, yet growth-filled adventure in many ways. I don’t teach and grade papers of 7th and 8th graders, but I do have the privilege to work with the most talented and inspiring group of dedicated and committed men and women. What a joy to look forward each day to working not only with the Heat Treat Today team, but also with you, the experts in the industry.

I attended my first trade show in October 2019 — The ASM Heat Treat Show in Detroit. I was such a newbie and it was pretty overwhelming, but an enjoyable experience. Doug, Mary, and the managing editor, Laura Miller, were incredibly kind in not only introducing me to many of you, but I was also thankful for the patient tutorials many of you gave as I began learning the industry. I’ve mentioned this Socrates quote many times, but I truly believe it, “The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms.” You helped me understand the terms!

While last year was a blur for us all with the cancellation of in-person trade shows, this year was an oasis for those of us extroverts who are energized by the face-to-face time that real, live shows provide. During this year’s Ceramics Expo in Cleveland and the ASM Heat Treat Show in St. Louis, I was able to meet so many of you — for the first time in person — who before this summer, I’d never met but had communicated with often.

Heat Treat Today team at the ASM Heat Treat Show 2021 in St. Louis. Left-Right: Michelle Ritenour, Doug Glenn, Karen Gantzer, Alyssa Bootsma, Ellen Porter, and Bethany Leone.

I truly believe we were created to be in community with one another, and these trade shows offered the opportunity to connect at a deeper level than emails afford. I loved talking with people about what they were working on and how Heat Treat Today could help in sharing their successes.

One of the people I had the pleasure of meeting was Carlos Carrasco of Carrasco Industrial Furnaces, a veteran expert in the industry. As we were chatting about article ideas, he asked if we’d be open to publishing the content in both English and Spanish. We loved the idea and so, with this issue, we are proud to feature our first ever Spanish-translated article entitled, “Guía para la Selección de Equipos para Tratamiento Térmico!” (p.33) which is “A Guide to Selecting Heat Treating Equipment” (p.28). We were honored to work with Carlos.

Taking those first steps can be wobbly, but oh so exhilarating when you experience the satisfaction of deciding to take on the unknown — whether it’s a career change, meeting new people, or accepting a new opportunity. It’s worth the effort. Go for it!

Message from the Editor: Firsts Read More »

Stop the Burn: 3 Tips to Cut Natural Gas Costs

op-edFor the next series of articles on heat treaters and combustion, the focus will be on the cost of natural gas and how we can reduce its consumption. Given significant movements in natural gas prices, it is essential we shift our focus to this important pocketbook issue.

This Technical Tuesday column appeared in Heat Treat Today’s November 2021 Vacuum Furnace print editionJohn Clarke is the technical director at  Helios Electric Corporation and is writing about combustion related topics throughout 2021 for Heat Treat Today.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electrical Corporation
Source: Helios Electrical Corporation

What Is the Cost To Operate My Burner System?

We will begin this and future articles by looking at natural gas prices and price forecast(s) that are published by the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Agency (EIA). Unlike the price for gasoline, we don’t drive past large, illuminated billboards displaying the current price of natural gas on our way to work, even though it is a significant operating cost for all heat treaters. Even if you operate primarily electrically heated equipment, natural gas is likely used to generate your electrical power. Obviously, neither Heat Treat Today or this author make any claims as to the accuracy of these projections. In other words, please don’t shoot the messenger. The American taxpayer funds this agency and it is only reasonable that we see what they have to say.

Let’s start with a quick definition. Henry Hub is a gas pipeline located in Erath, Louisiana that serves as the official delivery location for futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange. This hub connects to four intrastate and nine interstate pipelines. It is unlikely any industrial consumer pays the Henry Hub price alone for the natural gas they consume. There are a great many other factors that determine the price that appears on your monthly bill; but the Henry Hub price is indicative of pricing trends and represents a consistent way to discuss the cost.

A good website to bookmark in your browser is www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/. It is a quick read and will be the primary reference for my monthly sidebar. Let’s first look at the spot price trend. The spot price is the current price at which a natural gas can be bought or sold for immediate delivery at the Henry Hub. There is volatility in the price of natural gas because of supply, demand, and trading activities (speculation), but when we expand the time horizon, it provides a representative look at the pricing trend. This trend will be reflected in the price we will pay in the future. The prices quoted are in terms of U.S. Dollars per 1,000,000 BTU — roughly 1,000 SCF of natural gas.

The EIA also provides forward-looking projections — but we will leave it to the reader to explore this information on the EIA website. The intent of this series of articles is not to provide the basis of trading futures, but rather to provide some ideas on how to save money.

We can see a definite upward trend. When we combine this data with our understanding that natural gas is increasingly being used to displace coal to generate electricity and North America’s increasing capacity to export liquified natural gas (LNG), there is reason to believe this is a durable trend. We can expect to pay more next year than the recent past to heat our equipment. And in time, this higher fuel cost will lead to higher electrical rates.

How Can I Save Natural Gas?

To save natural gas, we can optimize our processes, reduce unnecessary air, and contain heat within the furnace and/or capture the energy that leaves our system to preheat work or combustion air. Ideally, we should take advantage of all these opportunities — provided the effort pays for itself. In general, operators of heat processing equipment are aware of these opportunities but are not always confident when determining the payback for their investments in time and capital. We will endeavor to bring clarity to these decisions by not only discussing opportunities, but also discussing how to quantify the value of the opportunities. The following are the questions that will be answered in future articles:

Optimizing the Process:

  1. How do I know when the material I am heating is at the desired temperature?
  2. Do I have excessive factors of safety built into my process to compensate for not knowing the temperature at the core of the part being heated?
  3. How much fuel can I save with a shorter cycle?

Reducing Air or Containing Heat:

  1. Is my furnace or oven at the correct internal pressure?
  2. Is it time to rebuild door jams?
  3. How much fuel is wasted because I am not containing heat within the furnace or letting excessive air reduce my combustion efficiency?

Reducing the Heat Exiting the System:

  1. Can I justify installing recuperators to preheat combustion air?
  2. Can the heat from my system be used to preheat work? If so, will I shorten my cycle time and save fuel?

No one likes rising energy prices, but if the trend is up, it is better to recognize reality and invest accordingly. It is our wish that future columns will provide ideas and tools to help you get the most from the energy you consume. If you have specific requests or questions that might guide our discussions, please let us know.

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

Stop the Burn: 3 Tips to Cut Natural Gas Costs Read More »

The Chief Human Resource Officer Will Be The New Chief Financial Officer: A 40 Under 40 Mandate

op-ed"What came first: money, in its various forms, or people? People. The idea and concept of money precipitated from people. Therefore, demographics cause economics and economics is a symptom of demographics. If you are an economist or an accountant, I realize this can be a painful, demeaning truth. But it is a truth none-the-less. Demography is destiny, and money is a byproduct of demographics." Kenneth W. Gronbach, author, expert, and futurist in the field of Demography and Generational Marketing, doesn't hold back as he writes his hot-take of what the new business model will look like!

This guest column appears in the Heat Treat Today September 2021 Trade Show print edition. Ken typically writes for the magazine in this edition where many young heat treaters -- 40, to be exact -- are featured annually. Give it a read, and email editor@heattreattoday.com if you have an op-ed or guest column that you would like to submit to Heat Treat Today!


Kenneth Gronbach
President/CEO
KGC Direct LLC

Hello, 40 Under 40 Class of 2021. There are big changes ahead in corporate structures large and small. And you Millennial-types are going to lead the charge. Human Resources will finally gain the dominance and importance it deserves. Remember when Human Resources was called “Personnel” and it was manned by B players who handed out insurance forms? Those days are gone. If a corporation is not led by A-players in Human Resources, it will not survive. The Chief Human Resource Officer will be the new Chief Financial Officer. You heard it here.

Ask anyone on a corporate board of directors who their key corporate C-level players are, and they will tell you: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and may even include Chief Operations Officer. The brains, the money, and the day to day. But what about the Chief Marketing Officer and the Chief Human Resource Officer? Communicating with the customer and developing the talent to serve them. What a concept!

The most important question any business must ask is one of demographics: How big is my end user market and is my end user market getting bigger or smaller? How many people are in my end user market? If my end user market is expanding, then we have opportunity to grow. If my end user market is shrinking, we have a problem that must be addressed posthaste. Why? Because the volume of my business is directly linked to the size of my end user market.

This is the essence of demographics. But wait, there’s more. So, we have determined that our end user market demographics are significantly expanding, and we have an opportunity to grow our business. But this is not going to happen by itself. We will need talent, people. Who are they? Where are they? How much training will they need? How much will they cost? How long before they ramp-up? Wait, we need an expert Chief Human Resource Officer. In fact, governed by the new normal in modern protocols, if a corporation doesn’t have a Chief Marketing Officer and a Chief Human Resource Officer, they don’t even need a CEO, COO or CFO!

Let’s examine the new normal people/talent challenges the Chief Human Resource Officer will face.

  1. Diversity and Inclusion: Black Lives Matter. Hiring and training African Americans, Asians and Latinos. Dealing fairly with LGBT issues. Recognizing Minority majority as it becomes the norm. Managing disability issues. It’s a new ball game
  2. Women in Leadership: Women outnumber men in college and law school. They will lead, but they will face challenges in the male dominated C-level management culture.
  3. Three Generations in the Workplace: En masse post-Covid exiting by the huge Baby Boomer Generation. The diminutive middle-age Generation X management shortage. The influx of the giant Generation Y/Millennials.

Big challenges to be sure, but they are not insurmountable, and, if handled correctly, these challenges will be a springboard into the realm of incredible opportunity. Take Human Resources seriously. Very seriously. And challenge your Chief Marketing Offi cer to understand his/her future market for your business, not just the market you presently enjoy.

Bob Dylan sang that, “The times, they are a changin’. . .”. It’s truer now than ever before. Yes, change may be painful, but if you don’t change, time will pass you by. Be well, Kenneth W. Gronbach.

About the Author: Kenneth W. Gronbach is a gifted keynote speaker and nationally recognized author, expert, and futurist in the field of Demography and Generational Marketing. He makes the science of shifting demography come alive with real life examples which make it relevant to today’s culture, business climate, and economy. With nearly three decades experience in retail advertising and marketing, Ken saw the direct results of shifting demographics in his clients’ profits. Eventually, his passion for the subject changed the direction of his career, to the benefit of readers of his books and attendees of his keynotes and other presentations. Contact Ken at ken@kcgdirect.com.

The Chief Human Resource Officer Will Be The New Chief Financial Officer: A 40 Under 40 Mandate Read More »

Nuts and Bolts of Combustion Systems – Safety Shutoff Valve

op-edSafety shutoff valves are the last line of defense against a potentially catastrophic incident. When conditions require, they interrupt the flow of fuel to the burner(s) and oven. There are many options when selecting fuel safety shutoff valves for your application. The construction and application of these devices is highly regulated by interlocking standards created by many different organizations. The goal of this article is to clarify how to comply with the most common standard affecting the reader: NFPA 86.

This column appeared in Heat Treat Today’s 2021 Trade Show September print editionJohn Clarke is the technical director at  Helios Electric Corporation and is writing about combustion related topics throughout 2021 for Heat Treat Today.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electric Corporation
Source: Helios Electric Corporation

To start, we must define our terms. The 2019 edition of NFPA 86* defines a safety shutoff valve as a “normally closed valve installed in the piping that closes automatically to shut off the fuel, atmosphere gas, or oxygen in the event of abnormal conditions or during shutdown.”1 A valve is “normally closed” (NC) if it closes automatically when power is removed. A furnace or oven typically has as few as two or more safety shutoff valves. [Author’s note: If the system uses radiant tubes for heating, and all the criteria are met, it may be acceptable to use only one valve in series, but this exception is not recommended by the author and will not be covered in this article.] There are two common arrangements for safety shutoff valve arrays—the Simple Double Block (Illustration 1) and the Double Block and Vent (Illustration 2). While both arrangements are compliant with the current version of NFPA 86, the vent is NOT required. In other words, Illustration 1 and Illustration 2 below are both acceptable.

The simple double block arrangement consists of two automatic, normally closed (NC) valves piped in series. It provides redundancy—both valves must leak for fuel gas to pass to the burner system. A double block and vent has two automatic, NC valves piped in series with a third automatic normally open (NO) valve installed between the NC valves. The purpose of the NO valve is to provide a path for any fuel gas leaking past the first NC valve to move to a safe location. Whether one should deploy a double block and vent approach depends on several considerations: Is the NO valve supervised? Is the selected vent location safe? And how will the system be inspected?

Illustration 1

Illustration 2

To start with, if the NO vent valve’s coil or wiring fails, it will remain open even when the system is operating—venting fuel gas. This is not only expensive, but high concentrations of vented fuel gas are an environmental and safety hazard. The solution to this concern is installing a monitored vent valve that only opens the NC valves after the vent valve is proven to be closed. This is typically accomplished with a proof-of-closure position switch that only closes after the vent valve is fully closed.

The next concern is the location and maintenance of the vent. The vent must terminate at a safe location that can accept the entire flow of fuel gas in the event of a failure. Therefore, hazards such as fresh air intakes and sources of ignition must be avoided at all costs. It is also important to periodically inspect the vent piping to ensure it remains unobstructed—insects and rodents may find the vent line a comfortable place to nest and bring up their young.

The last challenge is the periodic inspection of the vent valve and the vent piping—it is generally a challenge to test whether a vent line meets the design criteria, and leaking fuel gas can be vented without excessive backpressure.

A simple double block provides redundancy without the complexity of the vent. Good design practice, with proper valve selection, combined with proper fuel filtration greatly improves the reliability and longevity of both systems.

Valves used for safety shutoff valve applications must be listed by an approval agency for the service intended.2 Furthermore, depending on the flow rate, the valves must be equipped with either a local indicator showing the valve position and a means to prove the valve is closed.

For fuel gas flows below or equal to 150,000 BTU/hour, two safety shutoff valves in series will suffice. See Illustration 3 below. This is very typical for pilot lines.

Illustration 3

For fuel gas flows greater than 150,000 BTU/hour and less than or equal to 400,000 BTU/hour, two safety shutoff valves in series with local position indication are required. Local indication is generally a window where an operator can see the actual position of the valve—open or closed—without relying on any electrical circuit or pilot light. See Illustration 4 below.

Illustration 4

For fuel gas flows greater than 400,000 BTU/hour, NFPA 86 requires two safety shutoff valves in series with local position indication. One valve must be equipped with a valve closed switch (VCS) that closes after the valve is fully closed, or a valve proving system (VPS) that runs a tightness check which must be utilized. The signal from either this VCS or VPS must be included in the burner management system’s (BMS) purge permissive string to ensure no fuel gas is flowing during the system preignition purge. The VCS must not actuate before the valve is fully closed. This is typically accomplished by using valve overtravel, where the valve closes first, then the mechanism continues to move until the VCS is actuated. This arrangement is depicted in Illustration 5 below.

Illustration 5

For the arrangement depicted in Illustration 5, NFPA only requires one valve be supervised with a VCS—the additional costs of supervising both valves are very low and will enhance safety.

Whatever the method used to shut off the fuel to burners or pilots, the array of valves must be inspected and tested annually or per the manufacturer’s recommendations, whichever period is the shortest. All systems must be designed to be tested—with provision provided to cycle valves in test mode and the ability to measure any potential leakage. We will explore how a fuel train should be “designed to be tested” in an upcoming article.

The one thing to always remember—safety shutoff valves are always deployed to provide redundancy, so that any one component failure will not prevent a safe interruption of fuel gas; but, as with all systems, there may be unforeseen events that can lead to complete failure. Only qualified people should design, operate, and maintain combustion systems.

 

References

[1] National Fire Protection Association – NFPA 86 Standard for Ovens and Furnaces 2019 Edition (NFPA, Quincy, Massachusetts, May 24, 2018) 3.3.82.2 pp 86-14.

[2] National Fire Protection Association – NFPA 86 Standard for Ovens and Furnaces 2019 Edition (NFPA, Quincy, Massachusetts, May 24, 2018) 13.5.11.1 pp 86-49.

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Electric Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

Nuts and Bolts of Combustion Systems – Safety Shutoff Valve Read More »

Moving Beyond Combustion Safety — Designing a Crystal Ball

In June, we spent a good deal of time discussing a simple pressure switch to emphasize the many considerations that are necessary for proper installation. Now we will expand the discussion to how the switch works and what steps we can take to detect a failure that is likely to occur sometime in the future.

This column appeared in Heat Treat Today’s 2021 Automotive August print edition. John Clarke is the technical director at  Helios Electric Corporation and is writing about combustion related topics throughout 2021 for Heat Treat Today.


John B. Clarke
Technical Director
Helios Electric Corporation
Source: Helios Electric Corporation

A pressure switch is a Boolean device — it is either on or off — so how can we evaluate its performance in a manner where a potential failure can be detected before it occurs? The simple answer is time — how long does it take for the switch to respond to the condition it is intended to sense? What is the period between starting an air blower and the pressure switch closing? Has this time changed? Is a change in this time period to be expected, or does it portend a future failure?

A simple approach to evaluating this pressure switch’s time is to create predetermined limits — if the switch responds either too rapidly or too slowly — an alarm is set and the operator is alerted. Graph 1 illustrates this approach.

In Graph 1, the black band represents the time between the action (the start of the air blower) and the pressure switch closing. There is a warning band (yellow) — both high and low — that provides the early warning of a system performance problem. There is also a critical band (red) — both high and low — that provides the point at which the feedback for the pressure switch is determined to be unreliable. If the switch is part of a safety critical interlock, the system should be forced to a safe condition (in the case of a combustion system, with the burner off and a post purge being executed) if required.

Graph 1

Graph 2 depicts when a switch closing time exceeds the warning level. It could be the result of a problem with the blower and/or the pressure switch, but the deviation is not sufficiently large as to undermine confidence in the switch’s ultimate function.

Programmatically, if the time exceeds the warning band, and an alarm is registered, the responsible maintenance person is notified. If that is in the warning band, it can be addressed as time allows.

Graph 2

The warning bands give us the crystal ball to potentially see a problem before it causes a shutdown. As it is continuously monitored by the programmable logic controller (PLC), it may provide an increased level of safety, but that is dependent on a number of factors that are beyond the scope of this article.

The switch can be not only too slow to respond: an unusually fast response is a reason to be concerned as well. It could be that the pressure switch setpoint has been set too low — so low that it no longer provides useful feedback. Graph 3 is an example with an unusually fast response.

If the time is less than the “Critical Low” preset value, the switch’s feedback is determined to be unreliable. In this case, the setpoint may have been changed during a maintenance interval or even worse — the switch may be jumpered (this assumes we have an interlock string wired in series). The critical values are NOT intended to provide forward looking estimates of required maintenance — they are simply an enhanced safety measure.

This scenario assumes that the response of a component is consistent. In our example of a pressure switch monitoring an air blower, we can assume the time the blower required to reach full speed, the time for a pressure rise time in the air piping, and the responsiveness of the switch is consistent. These time intervals may not be consistent. The air supplied to the blower could be sourced from outside the building (temperate climate), which could cause air density changes between a cool, dry day and a hot, moist day. In this instance, what can be done to detect a failure?

An approach where we see fluctuations in the timing even in instances where all the components are operating properly would be to run a moving average of the time based on the last n operations. Then we compare the moving average to the last time and confirm that any change falls within a specific range.

Step 1 would be to average the last n values for the time required for the switch to trip. Then compare this value (ta) to the last time and see if the deviation exceeds the preset values. Let us assume if the time varies by more than 20% a warning should be issued to the maintenance staff.

Now this method will accommodate rapid fluctuations – but if the performance of the component degrades in a near linear fashion, this formula will not detect a premature failure.

An alternate approach would be to execute this routine on the first n cycles, as opposed to continuously updating the average. Using this method, the performance of the specific component is captured. Or this averaging can be executed on demand or based on the calendar or Hobbs timer.

These concepts are far from new, and it has only been because of the recent expansion in PLC memory storage capacity and processing power that it has been reasonable to perform this analysis on dozens of components on a furnace or oven. Remember, it is a shame to waste PLC processing time and memory!

One or more of these approaches, or similar approaches analyzing time, can indeed be a crystal ball that gives us warning of any of a number of potential failures — warning before a system shutdown is required.

About the Author:

John Clarke, with over 30 years in the heat processing area, is currently the technical director of Helios Electric Corporation. John’s work includes system efficiency analysis, burner design as well as burner management systems. John was a former president of the Industrial Heating Equipment Association and vice president at Maxon Corporation.

technical Tuesday

Moving Beyond Combustion Safety — Designing a Crystal Ball Read More »

Message from the Editor: How to Use This Guide

OCAre you someone who is satisfied with the same services and equipment that you've used for years, regardless of how mediocre the results are? Would you like to use a new guide to find better heat treat solutions?  

This original content article was written by Karen Gantzer, editor of Heat Treat Today, for Heat Treat Today's June 2021 Heat Treat Buyers Guide print edition. Feel free to contact Karen Gantzer at karen@heattreattoday.com if you have a question, comment, or any editorial contribution you’d like to submit.


80%-90% of you tell us that you prefer to have a print, hard-copy magazine – and the Heat Treat Buyers Guide is no exception. While it is the “hip,” “cool,” or “in” thing to “go digital,” the facts say otherwise. So, slap this hard-copy, bad boy down on your desk or table and let it sit around until you’re ready to buy something in the North American heat treat market. Then pick it up and enjoy all of the resources it has to offer.

Here’s how you can get the most out of this resource:

The Buyers Guide is divided into three major sections.

1. The first section, from pages 17-27, contains an alphabetic listing of all the suppliers of heat treating equipment and related services in the North American heat treat marketplace. You’ll notice that some of the companies listed in this section have a red star before their name. These are the advertisers who make this print version possible. Please lend your support to these industry-leading companies when it comes to purchasing.

Other companies have a boldface listing along with their company logo, but no red star. These are our Gold level suppliers who have paid extra to be in the online version. These companies are also worthy of your serious consideration.

There are still other companies who have not yet completed their online listing and therefore have relatively little information in this print edition. You’ll be able to recognize these companies because they have a blue asterisk (*) next to their name. More and more of these companies are signing up daily, so our suggestion is to check our website (www.heattreatbuyersguide.com) for the latest information about these companies OR go directly to these companies’ websites, which are listed along with their company names in this first section.

Those companies without a red star, no logo, and no blue asterisk are what we call our Basic Level companies. They’ve also contributed a nominal yearly amount to be listed in the online and print versions of this Buyers Guide. These companies are also very much worthy of your consideration.

2. The second major section of this Buyers Guide is an exhaustive listing of heat treat equipment and related services. There is a comprehensive index of these services listed between pages 28 and 32. This is a good place to start your search.

Immediately after the Index of Equipment & Related Services are six sub-categories with hundreds of products and companies who provide them. The six sub-categories are: 1) Heat Treat Furnaces, Ovens & Induction Equipment, 2) Heat Treat Components, Supplies & Materials, 3) Heat Treat Controls, Instrumentation & Sensors, 4) Heat Treat Auxiliary, Subs-System, Ancillary Equipment & Services, 5) Heat Treat Lab, Testing, & Materials Characterization Equipment, and 6) Heat Treat Gases & Atmosphere Generation Equipment. There are too many products and services to reproduce here, but you can see them all on pages 34-78.

3. The third and final section of this Buyers Guide runs from pages 79 to 83 and is a state-by-state listing of commercial heat treaters. If you’re looking for a company to perform heat treating on a product your company makes, this is a good place to start. There wasn’t room in this print edition to list the processes that these commercial heat treating companies perform, but if you go to the website, www.heattreatbuyersguide.com, you’ll be able to search for a commercial heat treater by the processes they perform AND their proximity to you.

A final thought. If you are a supplier of heat treating equipment or related services OR if you are a commercial heat treater and you are NOT listed in this directory, there is a quick and easy remedy. All you have to do is go to www.heattreatbuyersguide.com and search for your company’s name. If you are there, all you need to do is “claim” your listing. If you are not there, you can easily create a listing for your company in less than 15 minutes. If you have any trouble, please feel free to contact us at buyers_guide@heattreattoday.com with any questions. We’ll respond as quickly as possible.

Happy shopping!

Message from the Editor: How to Use This Guide Read More »