QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT Archives

The Future of Vacuum Oil Quenching

Despite years of research and development that resulted in several important technological innovations, the constraints of high-pressure gas quenching are ever more evident. In today’s Technical Tuesday, Robert Hill, FASM president of Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, addresses the creation of a new, robust style of vacuum oil quench furnace. The results challenge the schematics in how the next generation of oil quench furnaces should be designed, built, and operated.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2024 Vacuum print edition.

Introduction

After decades of research and development that resulted in several important technological innovations, the constraints of high-pressure gas quenching are ever more evident. Gas cooling runs into efficacy issues when compared to liquid quenchant cooling, chiefly for heavier cross sections. This stays true even when using specialized inert gas blends and heightened gas pressures.

Additionally, it is undeniable that stringent liquid quench Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) standards for certain aerospace alloy steels will never change. In fact, many industry standards (e.g., SAE/AMS and U.S. defense standards) and client specifications often mandate oil quenching of alloys or component parts.

To meet the demand for an effective, sustainable liquid quench solution, Solar Manufacturing with Solar Atmospheres engineers worked through the tumultuous period of the pandemic to create a new, robust style of vacuum oil quench furnace. Their work culminated in a vacuum oil quench furnace with a 36″ x 36″ x 48″ hot zone that operates up to 2000°F and can accommodate a weight capacity of 2000 lbs. With high uptime reliability and excellent metallurgical results, the NEO™ represents a paradigm shift in how the next generation of oil quench furnaces should be designed, built, and operated.

Figure 1. No decarburization, carburization, or surface contamination when tested in accordance with AMS2759/2 Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Rigorous Design for Metallurgical Excellence

The next generation of oil quench furnaces heralds an era of metallurgical excellence. This is made apparent across three key measures: control over surface contamination, prevention of parts cracking, and flexible processing of dissimilar materials.

No Surface Contamination

Figure 2. Loading in the NEO furnace
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

By implementing a vacuum design to the oil quench furnace, the research team avoided issues faced by traditional atmosphere oil quench furnaces, such as surface contamination and intergranular oxidation/intergranular attack (IGO/IGA). Additionally, they meticulously addressed design concerns regarding oil backstreaming in the new multichambered vacuum system. After two years of usage, the hot zone has remained pristine and oil-free.

By effectively removing the possibility of any surface contamination, both IGO and decarburized or carburized surfaces on oil quenched components are eliminated. These critical metallurgical features are unattainable in traditional gas-fired Endothermic batch furnace equipment.

Precision Prevents Part Cracking

To eliminate the potential of part cracking, quench oil temperatures should be able to be maintained between 140°F to 180°F ±5°F, which enhances consistent and repeatable metallurgical results. Furthermore, having the furnace designed so that quench oil recirculates within a closed loop oil to air cooling system keeps water contamination from infiltrating the oil.

No Carbon Content Matching

The next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces should also have highly controllable atmospheres, devoid of oxygen, which will remove the need to mechanism, which has demonstrated flawless performance for over two years.

Additionally, it is imperative that these furnaces be capable of using more conventional quench oil. A good quench needs excellent vapor pressure, powerful enough to allow the oil to vaporize. Furnaces can be designed with this in mind, allowing operators to save costs by using more conventional quench oils. For example, after rigorous laboratory experimentation into the vaporization of various quench oils at different pressures and temperatures, it was decided to purchase 3000 gallons of Houghton G quench oil, versus the “vacuum only” quench oils that are currently on the market today.

Figure 3. A display of a variety of parts which can be processed in the same run
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

The next generation of oil quench furnaces should also finally provide metallurgical and quality engineers the ability to thermocouple the oil quenched parts in accordance with AMS2750 Rev H standards. Being able to monitor part temperature with up to twelve (12) data points, as defined by the latest AMS2750 revision, ensures thorough and precise thermocouple monitoring, bolstering control and repeatability.

Lastly, in a hermetically sealed furnace, another layer of control should be established through installing an internal camera. With “eyes” into the furnace, the operator will be able to watch the load transfer in real time from a control panel.

Figure 4a and 4b. Thermocoupled parts Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

These operational attributes are on full display in the example of an automated austenitized cycle: At the completion of the cycle, the specially-designed transfer mechanism delivers precisely heated parts from the hot zone to the 3000-gallon oil quench chamber consistently within 20 seconds — all without the expulsion of flames and the discharge of smoke.

Oil flames and smoke are no longer acceptable realities in heat treatment operations. Unfortunately, the heat treating industry has been misled in the belief that a catastrophic disaster will never happen to them. There have been multiple “total losses,” mostly due to oil quench fires and explosions. Recently, it is well known that if an insurance adjuster sights a flame or smoke within a plant, they are reluctant or may even refuse to write the policy.

Vacuum furnaces offer a safe, contained alternative to the harmful open emissions and dangerous working conditions. For operations where the safety and the well being of the workforce are paramount, vacuum furnaces eliminate the risks associated with open flame exposure, explosivity, and skin burns.

Yet the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces should also open at both ends at the end of a cycle to expose it to atmosphere. Full air exchange mitigates the potential hazards of confined spaces.

Figure 5. Top view showing innovative design features for the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Meeting Environmental Demands

With ever more stringent environmental regulations, the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces will play a pivotal role in reducing the carbon footprint of the heat treating industry. It has been estimated that 80% of fuel used for heat treatment could be replaced by electricity, thus drastically reducing CO2 emissions: “When you burn something that contains carbon, you get carbon dioxide that you either must take care of or release into the atmosphere. With electric heating, you do not have any exhaust.”

The second column in the chart on page 30 addresses the multiple environmental concerns associated with traditional batch IQ gas-fired oil quenching furnaces. The third column outlines the advantages of the design for the next generation of oil quench furnaces, which embraces electric heating as a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. As sustainability pressures continue to mount, governments, clients, and primes alike will continue to flow down requirements on how heat treaters plan to reduce their carbon footprints.

Figure 6. Safety hazards in operating atmosphere furnaces
Source: The Monty

Conclusion

As the demands for metallurgical precision, safety, and environmental sustainability continue to mount, Solar’s new vacuum oil quench furnace emerges as a representative of the next generation of vacuum oil quenching technology. Characterized by unparalleled efficiency, precision, and sustainability, such furnaces will continue to lead the industry toward a future defined by cleanliness, safety, and environmental stewardship.

Table 1. Data from the AICHELIN Group
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

References

Kanthal, “Heat Treatment CO2 Emissions cut by 50 percent by using electricity” (April 2019), https://www.kanthal.com/en/knowledge-hub/inspiring-stories/heat-treatment-co2-emissions-cut-by-50-percent-by-using-electricity/.

Aichelin Group, “CO2 Footprints and the Heat Treat Industry,” The Monty (January 2024).

About the Author:

Robert Hill, FASM
President
Solar Atmospheres of Western PA
Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Robert Hill, FASM, began his career with Solar Atmospheres in 1995 at the headquarters plant in Souderton, PA. In 2000, Hill was assigned the responsibility of starting the second plant in Hermitage, PA, where he has specialized in the development of large furnace technology and titanium processing capabilities. Additionally, he was awarded the prestigious Titanium Achievement Award in 2009 by the International Titanium Association.

For more information: Contact Robert at bob@solaratm.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

The Future of Vacuum Oil Quenching Read More »

Ask the Heat Treat Doctor®: How Does One Determine Which Quench Medium To Use?

October 8, 2024 / HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

The Heat Treat Doctor® has returned to offer sage advice to Heat Treat Today readers and to answer your questions about heat treating, brazing, sintering, and other types of thermal treatments as well as questions on metallurgy, equipment, and process-related issues.

The Heat Treat Doctor® ha vuelto para ofrecer sabios consejos a los lectores de Heat Treat Today y para responder a suspreguntas sobre el tratamiento térmico, brazing, sinterizado y otros tipos de procesamiento térmico, así como preguntassobre metalurgia, equipos y problemasrelacionados con los procesos.

This article was originally published in Heat Treat Today‘s September 2024 People of Heat Treat print edition.

To read the article in Spanish, click here.

Quenching is a critical step in the heat treating process. And while there are often several choices available to the heat treater, a delicate balance exists between what is available to us and how we can optimize its performance characteristics to meet our client’s requirements/specifications. Material, part design (geometry), pre-and post-manufacturing requirements, loading, allowable dimensional change (i.e., distortion), and the process itself must be taken into careful consideration. Let’s learn more.

Quenchants — A Brief Overview

Today’s quenchants offer a broad and, in some instances, overlapping range of capabilities. But at a fundamental level, the role of a quenchant is to extract heat from the part surface to meet a specified critical cooling rate and achieve the desired microstructure in the component part necessary to achieve the required mechanical and physical properties. In hardening of steels, for example, one must miss the “nose” of the time-temperature transformation (TTT) curve if the desired end-result is a martensitic (or bainitic) microstructure. By contrast, the cooling rate for a normalizing process requires cooling in “still air” — a term that is often misunderstood and which we will cover in a future discussion.

Figure 1. Common types of quenchants and their effect on distortion (See Reference 1)

However, a quenchant (Figure 1) is more than just its cooling rate. Quenchants should be stable over their service life, especially with respect to degradation (e.g., oxidation), be safe, be easy to service and maintain, have a high vaporization point, ideally not interact with the part surface, be used within their optimum performance range, have long life, be easily removed by cleaning after quenching, and be cost effective.

As a very broad-based characterization, quenchants can be divided into the following general categories:

Liquid quenchants (e.g., water-based, oils, polymers, molten salts, and molten metals)
Gaseous quenchants (e.g., air, nitrogen, argon, hydrogen, steam, carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide, reducing gases, protective atmospheres — synthetic or generated, high-pressure gases)
Solid quenchants (e.g., water-cooled dies, plates, powders)
Mixed media quenchants (e.g., mist or fog quenching, fluidized beds)

Figure 2. Ishikawa (aka fishbone) diagram of quenching variables (See Reference 1)

Selection of the Optimal Quench Medium

Various factors must be taken into consideration when selecting the best quench medium. The following are some of the important considerations when selecting the proper quench medium (Figure 2):

Material — chemistry, hardenability, form (e.g., bar, plate, forging, casting), type (e.g., wrought, powder metal), and cleanliness to name a few
Part geometry/design — shape, size, weight, complexity
Mill or preheat treatment condition — annealed, normalized, pre-hardened, stress-relieved
Stress state — the cumulative effect of both mill operations and customer manufacturing operations prior to heat treatment
Loading — baskets (alloy, C/C composites, graphite plates, etc.)
Process parameters — temperature, time, preheating
Equipment selection — is it optimal or simply adequate for the job?
Quench medium(s) available — their limitations as well as their advantages

It is important to talk briefly here about two aspects of the quench medium selection process. First, note the difference between hardness and hardenability (which we will discuss in more detail in the future). Heat treaters tend to focus on hardness (since we can easily measure it in our shops), but hardenability is a critical consideration in quench medium selection. Hardenability is a material property independent of cooling rate and dependent on chemical composition and grain size. When evaluated by hardness testing, hardenability is defined as the capacity of the material under a given set of heat treatment conditions to harden “in-depth.” In other words, hardenability is concerned with the “depth of hardening,” or the hardness profile obtained, not the ability to achieve a particular hardness value. When evaluated by microstructural techniques, hardenability is defined (for steels) as the capacity of the steel to transform partially or completely from austenite to a defined percentage of martensite.

Table 1. Average and instantaneous values of the heat transfer coefficient (See Reference 3)

Second, one must be aware of both the average and instantaneous value of the heat transfer coefficient alpha of the quench medium. Although the maximum quenching “power” may be described by the instantaneous heat transfer coefficient, the average heat transfer coefficient (Table 1) provides a better relative comparison of the various quenching media since it represents the value of the heat transfer coefficient over the entire range of cooling (from the start to the end of quenching). It is important to remember that the ability to manage (not control) distortion is a delicate balancing act between uniform heat extraction and proper transformation.

A Common Example — Quench Oil Selection

Important factors to consider when selecting a quench oil, which hold true in a slightly modified form for most liquid quenchants, are: the type of quenchant (i.e., quench characteristics, cooling curve data — new and over time); quench speed (see Table 2); usage temperature; effective quench tank volume (i.e., the one gallon per pound of steel [8.4 L/kg] rule); and the client’s requirements.

Table 2. Classification of quench oils (See Reference 1)

Quench tank design factors also play an important role and involve the following:

Volume of oil in the quench tank
Number of agitators or pumps
Location of agitators
Type of agitators (fixed or variable speed)
Internal tank baffle arrangement (draft tubes, directional flow vanes, etc.)
Quench elevator design (i.e., flow restrictions)
Quenchant flow direction (up or down through the load)
Propeller size (diameter, clearance in draft tube)
Maximum (design) temperature rise of the oil after quenching
Height of the oil over the workload
Heat exchanger — type, size, heat removal rate (instantaneous BTU/minute)
Oil recovery time to setpoint

Finally, consideration must be given to factors such as: part mass; part geometry (e.g., thin and thick sections, sharp corners and holes, gear tooth profile/modulus, thread profile, etc.); part spacing in the load; effective flow velocity through the quench area (empty and with a load); stress state from prior (manufacturing) operations; post heat treat operations to be performed (if any); loading including the grids, baskets, and fixture (material and design); and the material (chemistry and hardenability).

Final Thoughts

Quenching, considered by many to be a complex and multi-faceted subject, is one heat treaters must constantly monitor and control. In future installments we will be discussing many of the individual aspects of quenching. What is important here is to recognize that done correctly, quenching
(in whatever form) will optimize a given heat treatment and help produce the highest quality parts demanded by the industries we serve.

References

Daniel Herring, Atmosphere Heat Treatment, Volume II: Atmospheres | Quenching | Testing (BNP Media Group, 2015).

Božidar Liščić et al., Quenching Theory and Technology, Second Edition (CRC Press, Taylor Francis Group, 2010).

Daniel Herring, “A Review of Gas Quenching from the Perspective of the Heat Transfer Coefficient,” Industrial Heating, February 2006.

About the Author

Dan Herring
“The Heat Treat Doctor”
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Dan Herring has been in the industry for over 50 years and has gained vast experience in fields that include materials
science, engineering, metallurgy, new product research, and many other areas. He is the author of six books and over
700 technical articles.

For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Ask the Heat Treat Doctor®: How Does One Determine Which Quench Medium To Use? Read More »

Consulta a The Heat Treat Doctor®:¿Cómo determinar cuál medio detemple utilizar?

October 8, 2024 / HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

This article was originally published in Heat Treat Today‘s September 2024 People of Heat Treat print edition.

To read the article in English, click here.

El temple es un paso fundamental en el proceso de tratamiento térmico. Y si bien el especialista en tratamiento térmico suele tener varias opciones disponibles, existe un delicado equilibrio entre lo que está disponible para nosotros y cómo podemos optimizar sus características de rendimiento para cumplir con los requisitos/especificaciones de nuestros clientes. Se deben tener en cuenta cuidadosamente el material, el diseño de la pieza (geometría), los requisitos previos y posteriores de manufactura, la carga, el cambio dimensional permitido (es decir, la distorsión) y el proceso como tal. Conozcamos más.

Medios de temple: una breve Descripción

Los medios de temple actuales ofrecen una amplia gama de capacidades que, en algunos casos, se traslapan. Sin embargo, en un nivel fundamental, la función de un medio de temple es extraer calor de la superficie de la pieza para cumplir con una velocidad crítica de enfriamiento especificada y con ello lograr la microestructura necesaria para lograr las propiedades mecánicas y físicas requeridas. En el temple de aceros, por ejemplo, se debe evitar pasar por la “nariz” de la curva de transformación-tiempo-temperatura (TTT) si el resultado final deseado es una microestructura martensítica (o bainítica). Por el contrario, la velocidad de enfriamiento para un proceso de normalización requiere enfriamiento “al aire”, un término que a menudo se malinterpreta y que abordaremos en una discusión futura.

Figura 1. Medios de Temple comunes y su efecto en la distorsión (1)

Sin embargo, un medio de temple (Figura 1) es más que solo su velocidad de enfriamiento. Los medios de temple deben ser estables durante su vida útil, especialmente con respecto a la degradación (por ejemplo, oxidación), ser seguros, ser fáciles de arreglar y mantener, tener un alto punto de vaporización, idealmente no interactuar con la superficie de la pieza, usarse dentro de su rango de rendimiento óptimo, tener una larga vida útil, eliminarse fácilmente mediante limpieza después del temple y ser rentables.

A manera de una caracterización muy amplia, los medios de temple se pueden dividir en las siguientes categorías generales:

Medios de temple líquidos (p. ej., a base de agua, aceites, polímeros, sales fundidas y metales fundidos)
Medios de temple gaseosos (p. ej., aire, nitrógeno, argón, hidrógeno, vapor, dióxido de carbono, dióxido de azufre, gases reductores, atmósferas protectoras sintéticas o generadas, gases a alta presión)
Medios de temple sólidos (p. ej., dados de prensa enfriados, placas y polvos)
Medios de medios mixtos (p. ej., temple por aspersión, lechos fluidizados)

Figura 2. Diagrama de Ishikawa (también conocido como de pescado) de las variables de temples (1)

Selección del medio de temple óptimo

Se deben tener en cuenta varios factores al seleccionar el mejor medio de temple. A continuación, se enumeran algunos de los aspectos importantes a tener en cuenta al seleccionar el medio adecuado (Figura 2):

Material: composición química, templabilidad, forma (p. ej., barra, placa, forja, fundición), tipo (p. ej., forjado, sinterizado) y limpieza, por nombrar algunos
Geometría/diseño de la pieza: forma, tamaño, peso, complejidad
Estado de laminación o tratamiento térmico previo: recocido, normalizado, preendurecido, relevado de esfuerzos
Estado de tensión: el efecto acumulativo de las operaciones de laminación y las operaciones de fabricación del cliente antes del tratamiento térmico
Carga: canastillas (aleación, compuesto C/C, placas de grafito, etc.)
Parámetros del proceso: temperatura, tiempo, precalentamiento
Selección del equipo: ¿es óptimo o simplemente adecuado para el trabajo?
Medio(s) de temple disponibles: sus limitaciones y ventajas

Es importante hablar brevemente aquí sobre dos aspectos del proceso de selección del medio de temple. Primero, observar la diferencia entre dureza y templabilidad (que analizaremos con más detalle en el futuro). Los tratadores térmicos tienden a centrarse en la dureza (ya que podemos medirla fácilmente en nuestro taller), pero la templabilidad es una consideración crítica en la selección del medio de temple. La templabilidad es una propiedad del material independiente de la velocidad de enfriamiento y dependiente de la composición química y el tamaño del grano. Cuando se evalúa mediante pruebas de dureza, la templabilidad se define como la capacidad del material bajo un conjunto dado de condiciones de tratamiento térmico para endurecerse “en profundidad”. En otras palabras, la templabilidad se relaciona con la “profundidad de endurecimiento”, o el perfil de dureza obtenido, no con la capacidad de alcanzar un valor de dureza particular. Cuando se evalúa mediante técnicas microestructurales, la templabilidad se define (para aceros) como la capacidad del acero para transformarse parcial o completamente de austenita a un porcentaje definido de martensita.

Tabla 1. Valores medios e instantáneos del coeficiente de transferencia de calor (3)

En segundo lugar, se debe tener en cuenta tanto el valor medio como el instantáneo del coeficiente de transferencia de calor alfa (α) del medio de temple. Aunque la “potencia” máxima de temple se puede describir mediante el coeficiente de transferencia de calor instantáneo, el coeficiente de transferencia de calor promedio (Tabla 1) proporciona una mejor comparación relativa de los diversos medios de temple, ya que representa el valor del coeficiente de transferencia de calor en todo el rango de enfriamiento (desde el inicio hasta el final del temple). Es importante recordar que la capacidad de gestionar (no controlar) la distorsión es un delicado acto de equilibrio entre la extracción uniforme del calor y la transformación adecuada.

Tabla 2. Clasificación de los aceites de temple (1)

Un ejemplo común: selección de aceite de temple

Los factores importantes a tener en cuenta al seleccionar un aceite de temple, que son válidos en una forma ligeramente modificada para la mayoría de los medios líquidos, son: el tipo de medio (es decir, características del temple, datos de la curva de enfriamiento, nuevo y a lo largo del tiempo); velocidad de temple (consulte a Tabla 2); temperatura de uso; volumen efectivo del tanque de enfriamiento [es decir, la regla de un galón por libra de acero (8,4 L/kg)]; y los requisitos del cliente.

Los factores de diseño del tanque de temple también juegan un papel importante e involucran lo siguiente:

Volumen de aceite en el tanque de temple
Número de recirculadores o bombas
Ubicación de los recirculadores
Tipo de recirculadores (velocidad fija ovariable)
Disposición de los deflectores internos del tanque (tubos de aspiración, álabes de flujo direccional, etc.)
Diseño del elevador de temple (es decir, restricciones de flujo)
Dirección del flujo del temple (hacia arriba o hacia abajo a través de la carga)
Tamaño de la propela (diámetro, espacio libre en el tubo de aspiración)
Máximo incremento dela temperatura (diseño) delaceite después del temple
Altura del aceite sobre la carga
Intercambiador de calor: tipo, tamaño, tasa de extracción de calor (BTU instantáneos/minuto)
Tiempo de recuperación del aceite hasta el set point

Por último, se deben tener en cuenta factores como: la masa de la pieza; la geometría de la pieza (por ejemplo, secciones delgadas y gruesas, esquinas y barrenos afilados, perfil de los dientes del engrane, perfil de la rosca, etc.); espaciamiento de la pieza en la carga; velocidad de flujo efectiva a través del área de temple (vacía y con carga); estado de tensión de operaciones anteriores (de manufactura); operaciones de tratamiento térmico posteriores a realizar (si las hay); carga, incluidas las charolas, las canastillas y el herramental (material y diseño); y el material (composición química y templabilidad).

Reflexiones finales

El temple, considerado por muchos como un tema complejo y multifacético, es un asunto que los especialistas en tratamiento térmico deben supervisar y controlar constantemente. En futuras entregas, analizaremos muchos de los aspectos individuales del temple. Lo importante aquí es reconocer que, si se realiza correctamente, el temple (en cualquier forma) optimizará un tratamiento térmico determinado y ayudará a producir las piezas de la más alta calidad que exigen las industrias a las que prestamos nuestros servicios.

Referencias

Daniel Herring, Atmosphere Heat Treatment, Volume II: Atmospheres | Quenching | Testing (BNP Media Group, 2015).

Bozidar Liscic et al., Quenching Theory and Technology, Second Edition (CRC Press, Taylor Francis Group, 2010).

Daniel Herring, “A Review of Gas Quenching from the Perspective of the Heat Transfer Coefficient,” Industrial Heating, February 2006.

Sobre el autor

Dan Herring ha trabajado en la industria durante más de 50 años y ha adquirido una vasta experiencia en campos que incluyen ciencia de materiales, ingeniería, metalurgia, investigación de nuevos productos y muchas otras áreas. Dan es
autor de seis libros y más de 700 artículos técnicos.

Para más información: Comuníquese con Dan en dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Consulta a The Heat Treat Doctor®:¿Cómo determinar cuál medio detemple utilizar? Read More »

Heat Treat Radio #112: Lunch & Learn: How To Use a Hardenability Chart

August 15, 2024 / HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, HEAT TREAT RADIO, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

In this episode of Heat Treat Radio, Doug Glenn discusses the hardenability of materials with guest Michael Mouilleseaux, general manager at Erie Steel LTD. Michael walks us through how to interpret hardenability charts and provides detailed insights on reading these charts, including addressing the importance of understanding the nuances of complicated part geometry.

Below, you can watch the video, listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or read an edited transcript.

HTT · Lunch & Learn: How To Use a Hardenability Chart

The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.

Understanding a Hardenability Chart (01:59)

Doug Glenn: What I’d like to do is talk through this chart and learn how to read this a little bit better. And I’d like to ask questions about it because I’m not familiar with this, and I’m sure there are going to be some listeners and viewers who aren’t familiar with it. This will be just a quick tutorial on how to read these charts.

Go to the upper, right-hand corner. First off, SAE 4320H is the grade of the steel that we’re talking about?

The Heat Treat Lunch & Learn crew: Doug Glenn, Publisher of Heat Treat Today; Michael Mouilleseaux, General Manager at Erie Steel LTD.; Bethany Leone, Managing Editor of Heat Treat Today
Use this chart to follow along with the conversation.
Source of chart: Erie Steel, Ltd.

Michael Mouilleseaux: Correct.

Doug Glenn: Then the table right below that you’ve got percentage C (carbon). Is Mn manganese?

Michael Mouilleseaux: Manganese.

Doug Glenn: Thank you very much. Silicon, nickel, chrome, moly. My question is about those ranges. Is this basically saying the percentage carbon on the far left in 4320H goes anywhere from 0.17–0.23?

Michael Mouilleseaux: That is correct.

Doug Glenn: Okay. So that’s variability right there. All of those are basically telling you what the ranges are in those alloys in this grade of steel?

Michael Mouilleseaux: That is correct.

Doug Glenn: Then you go down to the top columns of this table below, and it says “Approximate diameter of rounds with same as quenched HRC in inches.” Right?

Approximate diameter of rounds with same as quenched HRC in inches
Source: Erie Steel, Ltd.

Michael Mouilleseaux: Yeah. Essentially, the first three rows are for water quenching. And the bottom three are for oil quenching.

Doug Glenn: If you go over to the second major column called “Location in round,” what’s the size of the round we’re working on here?

Michael Mouilleseaux: It can vary. Go down to where it says, “Mild Oil Quench,” then left to “Surface,” then left then go to “2 inches.” Then, go straight down to the bottom, and that’s approximately J5. So, the “Distance from Quenched End — Sixteenths of an Inch” is Jominy position 5.

Michael Mouilleseaux: If you go to Jominy position 5 on the left-hand chart, you can see the hardness limits for that; the maximum is Rockwell C 41, and the minimum is Rockwell C 29. So, the chemistry can vary provided the hardenability at J5 is 29–41.

Doug Glenn: That’s the acceptable range?

Michael Mouilleseaux: That’s the acceptable range. That’s one way of looking at it. The chemistry would allow you to do that.

Now, go back to the chart on the right-hand side and to “Surface,” move down one row to “¾ radius from center,” and go left to two inches. Moving down from there you see that is Jominy position 8. So, the surface of a two-inch round is Jominy position 5, and the ¾ radius is Jominy position 8.

If you go to the hardness chart on the left-hand side, that says that if you had a two-inch round of 4320H, and it was oil quenched, and you check the hardness at ¾ radius, then the expectation is that it would be 23–34.

Now, go back to the same chart that we were just at, and go to the “Center” row of “Mild oil quench.” Continue left to two inches, and that’s J12. Go back to the left-hand chart, and J12 is 20–29 in the center of the part.

So, the surface of the part could be 41, ¾ radius, center of the part would be 34, and the center of the part would be 29.And that would all meet the criteria.

Doug Glenn: The maximum for J5 would be 41.But at J12 you could get a 20 in the middle.

Michael Mouilleseaux: Right. That is one way to look at this chart. But there is another way.

Notice that it says “rounds.”There are some nuances to having flats and rectangles because, if you think about it, for the cross-sectional area of a rectangle, the hardenability is going to be determined by the direction that it is thinnest, not by the direction that it is thickest.

Take a gear tooth, for example: in the chart that we just made up the gear teeth, the root of the gear was about a half inch, just slightly more; and if we go to this same chart, go to “Center” of “Mild oil quench,” and then go to a “0.5 inch,” and when you go straight down, that’s the J3.

Is a gear necessarily a round? Of course, the answer to that is no. So, in complex shapes you can use this data, but you have to interpolate it in order to understand it.

To some extent, the first time you run this, you’re going to say, “I have a gear, and the root is a half inch across. And I know that the J3 is 40. And I’ll run this part, and I’ll section it and I’ll measure it and it’s 40. And I’ll say that’s a good approximation of that.” And experientially, you build confidence in this, that is, it’s your operation, your quenching operation, and your components. It allows you to interpolate these, and they become extremely useful.

So, is it definitive? No. Is it useful? Yes.

Doug Glenn: It gives you a ballpark, right? I mean, it’s giving you something, maybe guardrails.

Michael Mouilleseaux: It gives you a ballpark; it gives you guardrails. And I can tell you that after having run gear product in the same equipment for ten years, I can say that it’s definitive. I can say that if I have this hardenability, and I get this hardenability number for this heat, and these gears are made from this heat of steel, and it has a J3 of 42. If I’m at 38, I know something is going on other than just hardenability. And, at that point, I would suspect my heat treat operation.

Doug Glenn: Yeah. I have one more question about this chart: On the bottom right part of the graph there are two plot lines on there. What do those represent? I was thinking one represented the water quench and the bottom one represents the oil quench.

Plot lines representing maximum hardenability and minimum hardenability
Source: Erie Steel, Ltd.

Michael Mouilleseaux: The top one represents the maximum hardenability. And the lower the lower one represents the minimum hardenability.

Doug Glenn: That’s your band. Okay. Those are basically your values over on the left-hand side then. Very good.

I don’t know about you, but I found that helpful. I really didn’t ever know how to read these tables. So, maybe someone else will find that useful. Thanks, Michael. I appreciate your expertise.

Michael Mouilleseaux: It’s been my pleasure.

About The Guest

Michael Mouilleseaux
General Manager at Erie Steel, Ltd.
Sourced from the author

Michael Mouilleseaux is general manager at Erie Steel LTD. Mike has been at Erie Steel in Toledo, OH, since 2006 with previous metallurgical experience at New Process Gear in Syracuse, NY, and as the Director of Technology in Marketing at FPM Heat Treating LLC in Elk Grove, IL. Having graduated from the University of Michigan with a degree in Metallurgical Engineering, Mike has proved his expertise in the field of heat treat, co-presenting at the 2019 Heat Treat show and currently serving on the Board of Trustees at the Metal Treating Institute.

Contact Mike at mmouilleseaux@erie.com.

Search Heat Treat Equipment And Service Providers On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Heat Treat Radio #112: Lunch & Learn: How To Use a Hardenability Chart Read More »

All About the Quench and Keeping Cool: Thru-process Temp Monitoring and Gas Carburizing

May 7, 2024 / ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, CARBURIZING, CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, CONTROLS, CONTROLS TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

The future of heat treating requires new manufacturing solutions like robotics that can work with modular design. Yet so also does temperature monitoring need to be seamless to know how effectively your components are being heat treated — especially through being quenched. In this Technical Tuesday, learn more about temperature monitoring through the quench process.

Gas Carburization

Carburizing has rapidly become one of the most critical heat treatment processes employed in the manufacture of automotive components. Also referred to as case hardening, it provides necessary surface resistance to wear, while maintaining toughness and core strength essential for hardworking automotive parts.

Figure 1. Typical carburizing heat treat temperature profile showing the critical temperature/time steps: (i) carburization, (ii) quench, and (iii) temper. (Source: PhoenixTM)

The carburizing process is achieved by heat treating the product in a carbon rich environment (Figure 1), typically at a temperature of 1562°F–1922°F (850°C–1050°C). The temperature and process time significantly influence the depth of carbon diffusion and other related surface characteristics. Critical to the process is a rapid quenching of the product following the diffusion in which the temperature is rapidly decreased to generate the microstructure, giving the enhanced surface hardness while maintaining a soft and tough product core.

The outer surface becomes hard via the transformation from austenite to martensite while the core remains soft and tough as a ferritic and/or pearlitic microstructure. Normally, carburized microstructures following quench are further tempered at temperatures of about 356°F (180°C) to transform some of the brittle martensite into tempered martensite to enhance ductility and grindability.

Critical Process Temperature Control

As discussed, the success of carburization is dependent on accurate, repeatable control of the product temperature and time at that temperature through the complete heat treatment process. Important to the whole operation is the quench, in which the rate of cooling (product temperature change) is critical to achieve the desired changes in microstructure, creating the surface hardness. It is interesting that the success of the whole heat treat process can rest on a process step which is so short (minutes), in terms of the complete heat teat process (hours). Getting the quench correct is not only essential to achieve the desired metal microstructure, but also to ensure that the physical dimensions and shape of the product are maintained (no distortion/warping) and issues such as quench cracking are eliminated.

Obviously, as the quench is so critical to the whole heat treat process, the correct quench selection needs to be made to achieve the optimum properties with acceptable levels of dimensional change. Many different quenchants can be applied with differing quenching performances. The rate of heat transfer (quench rate) of quench media in general follows this order from slowest to quickest: air, salt, polymer, oil, caustic, and water.

Technology Challenges for Temperature Monitoring

When considering carburization from an industry standpoint, furnace heat treat technology generally falls into one of two camps, embracing either air quench (low pressure carburization) or oil quench (sealed gas carburization/LPC with integral or vacuum oil quench). Although each achieves the same end goal, the heat treat mechanisms and technologies employed are very different, as are the temperature monitoring challenges.

To achieve the desired carburized product, it is necessary to control and hence monitor the product temperature through the three phases of the heat treat process. Conventionally, product temperature monitoring would be attempted using the traditional trailing thermocouple method. For many modern heat treat processes including carburization, the trailing thermocouple method is difficult and often practically impossible.¹ The movement of the product or product basket from stage to stage, often from one independent sealed chamber to another (lateral or vertical movement), makes the monitoring of the complete process a significant challenge.

With the industry driving toward fully automated manufacturing, furnace manufacturers are now offering the complete package with full robotic product loading that includes shuttle transfer systems and modular heat treat phases to process both complete product baskets and single piece operations. Although trailing thermocouples may allow individual stages in the process to be measured, they cannot provide monitoring of the complete heat treat journey. Testing is therefore not under true normal production conditions, and therefore is not an accurate record of what happens in normal day to day operation.

Figure 2 shows schematic diagrams of two typical carburizing furnace configurations that would not be possible to monitor using trailing thermocouples. The first shows a modular batch furnace system where the product basket is transferred between each static heat treat operation (preheat, carburizing furnace, cooling station, quench, quench wash, temper furnace) via a charge transfer cart. The second shows the same heat treat operation but performed in a continuous indexed pusher furnace configuration where the product basket moves sequentially through each heat treat operation in a semi-continuous flow.

Figure 2.1. Modular batch furnace system (Source: PhoenixTM)

Figure 2.2. Continuous pusher furnace schematic (Source: PhoenixTM)

Thru-process temperature monitoring as a technique overcomes such technical restrictions. The data logger is protected by a specially designed thermal barrier, therefore, can travel with the product through each stage of the process measuring the product/process temperature with short, localized thermocouples that will not hinder travel. The careful design and construction of the monitoring system is important to address the specific challenges that different heat treat technology brings including modular batch and continuous pusher furnace designs (Figure 2).²

The following section will focus specifically on monitoring challenges of the sealed gas carburizing process with integral oil quench. Technical challenges of the alternative low pressure carburizing technology with high pressure gas quench have previously been discussed in an earlier publication.³

Monitoring Challenges of Sealed Gas Carburization — Oil Quench

Figure 3. “Thru-process” temperature monitoring system for use in a sealed carburizing furnace with integral oil quench — (3.1) Monitoring system entering furnace with thermocouple fixed to automotive gears, product test pieces (3.2) System exiting oil quench tank (3.3) System inserted into wash tank with product basket (Source: PhoenixTM)

Presently, the most common traditional method of gas carburizing for automotive steels is often referred to as sealed gas carburizing. In this method, the parts are surrounded by an endothermic gas atmosphere. Carbon is generated by the Boudouard reaction during the carburization process, typically at 1562°F–1832°F (850°C –1000°C). Despite the dramatic appearance of a sealed gas carburizing furnace, with its characteristic belching flames (Figure 3), from a monitoring perspective, the most challenging aspect of the process is not the heating, but the oil quench cooling. For such furnace technology, the historic limitation of “thru-process” temperature profiling has been the need to bypass the oil quench and wash stations, missing a critical process step from the monitoring operation. Obviously, passing a conventional hot barrier through an oil quench creates potential risk of both system damage from oil ingress and barrier distortion, as well as general process safety. However, the need to bypass the quench in certain furnace configurations by removing the hot system from the confined furnace space could create significant operational challenges, from an access and safety perspective.

Monitoring of the quench is important as ageing of the oil results in decomposition (thermal cracking), oxidation, and contamination (e.g. water) of the oil, all of which degrade the viscosity, heat transfer characteristics, and quench efficiency. Control of physical oil temperature and agitation rates is also key to oil quench performance. Quench monitoring allows economic oil replacement schedules to be set, without risk to process performance and product quality.

Figure 4. “Thru-process” temperature monitoring system oil quench compatible thermal barrier design: (1) Robust outer structural frame keeping insulation and inner barrier secure; (2) Internal thermal barrier — completely sealed with integral microporous insulation protecting data logger; (3) Mineral insulated thermocouples sealed in internal thermal barrier with oil tight compression fitting; (4) Multi-channel high temperature data logger; and (5) Sacrificial insulation blocks replaced after each run. (Source: PhoenixTM)

To address the process challenges, a unique thermal barrier design has been developed that both protects the data logger in the furnace (typically three hours at 1697°F/925°C) and also protects during transfer through the oil quench (typically 15 mins) and final wash station (Figure 3). The key to the barrier design is the encasement of a sealed inner barrier with its own thermal protection with blocks of high-grade sacrificial insulation contained in a robust outer structural frame (Figure 4).

Quench Cooling Phases

Monitoring the oil quench in carburization gives the operator a unique insight into the product’s specific cooling characteristics, which can be critical to allow optimal product loading and process understanding and optimization. From a scientific perspective, the quench temperature profile trace, although only a couple of minutes in duration, is complex and unique. From a zoomed in quench trace (Figure 5) taken from a complete carburizing profile run, the three unique heat transfer phases making up the oil quench cool curve can be clearly identified:

Figure 5. Oil quench temperature profile for different locations on an automotive gear test piece shows the three distinct heat transfer phases: (1) film boiling “vapor blanket”, (2) nucleate boiling, and (3) convective heat transfer. (Source: PhoenixTM)

Film boiling “vapor Blanket”: The oil quenchant creates a layer of vapor (Leidenfrost phenomenon) covering the metal surface. Cooling in this stage is a function of conduction through the vapor envelope. Slow cool rate since the vapor blanket acts as an insulator.
Nucleate boiling: As the part cools, the vapor blanket collapses and nucleate boiling results. Heat transfer is fastest during this phase, typically two orders of magnitude higher than in film boiling.
Convective heat transfer: When the part temperature drops below the oil boiling point. the cooling rate slows significantly. The cooling rate is exponentially dependent on the oil’s viscosity.

From a heat treat perspective, the quench step relative to the whole process (hours) is quick (seconds), but it is probably the most critical to the performance of the metallurgical phase transitions and achieving the desired core microstructure of the product without risk of distortion. By being able to monitor the quench step, the process can be validated for different products with differing size, form, and thermal mass. As shown in Figure 6, the quench curve profile over the three heat transfer phases is very different for two different automotive gear sizes.

Figure 6. Oil quench temperature profile for different automotive gear sizes (20MnCr5 case hardening steel) with different thermal masses: Passenger Car Gear (2.2 lbs) and Commercial Vehicle Gear (17.6 lbs) (Source: PhoenixTM)

Summary

As discussed in this article, one of the key process performance factors associated with gas carburization is the control and monitoring of the product quench step. Employing an oil quench, the measurement of such operation is now very feasible as part of heat treat monitoring. Innovations in thru-process temperature profiling technology offer specific system designs to meet the respective application challenges.

References

[1] Dr. Steve Offley, “The light at the end of the tunnel – Monitoring Mesh Belt Furnaces,” Heat Treat Today, February 2022, https://www.heattreattoday.com/processes/brazing/brazing-technical-content/the-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel-monitoring-mesh-belt-furnaces/.

[2] Michael Mouilleseaux, “Heat Treat Radio #102: Lunch & Learn, Batch IQ Vs. Continuous Pusher, Part 1,” interviewed by Doug Glenn, Heat Treat Radio, October 26, 2023, audio, https://www.heattreattoday.com/media-category/heat-treat-radio/heat-treat-radio-102-102-lunch-learn-batch-iq-vs-continuous-pusher-part-1/.

[3] Dr. Steve Offley, “Discover the DNA of Automotive Heat Treat: Thru-process Temperature Monitoring,” Heat Treat Today, August 2023, https://www.heattreattoday.com/discover-the-dna-of-automotive-heat-treat-thru-process-temperature-monitoring/.

About the Author

Dr Steve Offley (“Dr O”), Product Marketing Manager, PhoenixTM

Dr. Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” has been the product marketing manager at PhoenixTM for the last five years after a career of over 25 years in temperature monitoring focusing on the heat treatment, paint, and general manufacturing industries. A key aspect of his role is the product management of the innovative PhoenixTM range of thru-process temperature and optical profiling and TUS monitoring system solutions.

For more information: Contact Steve at Steve.Offley@phoenixtm.com.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

All About the Quench and Keeping Cool: Thru-process Temp Monitoring and Gas Carburizing Read More »

It’s Time for Another Look at Vacuum Oil Quenching

December 12, 2023 / FEATURED NEWS, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Oil quenching can be a dirty phrase around the heat treat shop. But with vacuum, does it have to be?

This Technical Tuesday article was written by Don Marteeny, vice president of engineering at SECO/VACUUM Technologies, for Heat Treat Today’s November 2023 Vacuum Heat Treating print edition.

There are metallurgical advantages to oil quenching for which there are no gas quench substitutes, but for a time, those advantages only came bundled with some disadvantages that proved incompatible with a growing preference for vacuum processes. This drove vacuum oil quenching (VOQ) to evolve and improve, often faster than its reputation. VOQ has since matured into a convenient, safe, and economical choice, offering today’s vacuum heat treaters all the metallurgical advantages of oil quench without any of the compromises.

A Familiar Scene . . .

Don Marteeny
Vice President of Engineering
SECO/VACUUM Technologies

When oil quenching is mentioned in the break room of any heat treat department, it’s a sure bet that those listening have very similar thoughts. With just the mere mention of oil, their thoughts carry them, not to memories of the first time they helped their dad change the oil in their car in the family garage, but instead to a row of furnaces belching flames from their doors. Next, they are sure to see one of the doors open, and the familiar sensation of hot air moves through their mind. They may – for a moment – expect the smell of salt air, the sand between their toes, and the sun from above.

For many heat treaters, this is but a momentary escape. Soon, the taste and smell of hot oil and metal return them to the moment, and they know they are standing next to a row of batch integral quench (aka, batch IQ or BIQ) furnaces.

It’s about then they will feel the heat of those flames at the end of this furnace line or by the transfer car, wiping the sweat from their brow with a sooty hand and anticipating a return to the break room for a cool drink of water.

Sound familiar? If so, you’re one of the hundreds of heat treaters who has had the pleasure of operating a tried-and-true atmosphere integral quench line; it faithfully does its job, hardening and case hardening steels where oil is the only heavy lifter that can do the job.

Figure 1. Atmosphere oil quenching
Source: SECO/VACUUM Technologies

Necessity Waiting on Invention

While heat treaters have been diligently pumping out oil hardened steels, furnace builders and OEMs alike have been trying to find ways to move away from oil to quenchants that, primarily, reduce distortion, but also that are cleaner, require less processing, and present a safer working environment. Despite their efforts working with modified quenchants – including high pressure gas quenching (HPGQ) in vacuum furnaces – oil quenching has proven robust, maybe even stubborn.

Does that mean we are stuck with the integral quench furnace and its fire-breathing ways? Not necessarily. . . .

Figure 2. D-Type double chamber for batch work processing with conventional loading over the oil quench
Source: SECO/VACUUM Technologies

An Invention Waiting on Improvement

The concept of a vacuum oil quenching furnace is nothing new. When first developed, it was unique because it combined the advantages of vacuum heat treating with the ability to oil quench. But at the time, they were an unlikely couple that never really got along as well as the atmosphere furnace with an oil quench tank.

Vacuum oil quench furnaces were expensive, had large footprints, and were not particularly reliable. Plus, if case hardening was required, low pressure carburizing was not particularly attractive as it was still in its infancy, at least compared to gas carburizing. So, VOQ stayed in the shadows, fulfilling limited roles where the application warranted the extra complication of vacuum. In the meantime, the integral quench furnace became the workhorse of choice, churning out oil and case hardened parts for industries worldwide.

HPGQ Drives Improvement in Vacuum Furnace Technology

Despite the success of the integral quench furnace, VOQ remained present, stirring in the shadows. In the meantime, vacuum furnace technology advanced through the development of high pressure gas quenching. The design and construction of a vacuum furnace lent itself to this application well and introduced a host of advantages, such as found in Maciej Korecki’s “Case Study of CMe-T6810-25 High Volume Production”:
• Decreased distortion
• Elimination of intergranular oxidation (IGO)
• No decarburization

Vacuum Furnaces Move from Niche to Standard Issue

In addition, these design developments supported the opportunity to case harden parts through the use of low pressure carburizing (LPC). Coupled with quenching pressures up to 25 bar, the HPGQ-equipped vacuum furnace became a real option for the heat treater interested in through hardening that did not require:
• Special atmosphere generation equipment (atmosphere generator)
• Lengthy furnace-conditioning cycles to assure the correct gas carburizing conditions as is typically necessary in the batch IQ furnace
• Post-heat treating surface cleaning in the form of washing or oxidation removal

VOQ Begins to Follow Suit

Still, vacuum and HPGQ were limited in their ability to serve in the role of hardening some steels when considering common geometries. This meant that, for those steels, oil remained the go-to quenching solution. As a result, the VOQ furnace became the furnace of choice. It still required:
• Post-quench wash
• Aggressive oil circulation to minimize distortion
• Selection of the appropriate oil
• Careful fixture design
However, the advantages were too many to ignore. The fact that one could through harden steels like 8620 in a clean environment without the safety and cleanliness concerns inherent to integral quench furnaces was a huge advantage. And although furnace footprint remained a concern until the early 2000s, advancements in areas such as mixer design, vacuum pumps, and low vapor pressure quenching oils all contributed to decreasing the footprint and increasing the reliability of VOQ, making it an even more viable option. In more recent times, environmental concerns have also renewed attention to the VOQ furnace because of its vacuum capability. Advantages include:
• Electric heating – no natural gas consumption
• Inert gas atmosphere or vacuum environment – no atmosphere generator needed • Zero CO2 emissions, even when case hardening using LPC

Figure 3. T-Type triple chamber for continuous batch work – oil quench or gas cooling/quenching with a separate chamber for preheating and semicontinuous operation
Source: SECO/VACUUM Technologies

Which Brings Us to Today

Vacuum oil quenching technology has progressed to overcome the challenges of yesteryear, and technological improvements have made it a flexible and configurable option for a heat treater’s current – and future – needs.

The VOQ is now available in configurations that provide both batch and semicontinuous options. This provides the opportunity to harden or case harden components with increased productivity and efficiency.

A common configuration offered is the two-chamber VOQ furnace as pictured in Figure 2. In this batch type configuration, common working zone sizes – such as 24″ x 24″ x 36″ or 36″ x 36″ x 48″ – are available with load capacities up to 2,650 lbs. A graphite-insulated hot zone provides the capability to achieve working temperatures up to 2400°F while providing the platform to case harden using LPC. This configuration also has the ability to conduct partial pressure heating using nitrogen. When quenching, the use of high-flow oil mixers promotes good oil mixing during quench to minimize distortion. This configuration can also cool in nitrogen above the oil in the quench tank, providing additional process flexibility.

In applications requiring higher productivity, a third preheating chamber can be added to the furnace system to provide the opportunity to preheat the furnace charge. The addition of the preheating chamber provides a semicontinuous operation as opposed to the batch operation provided by the two-chamber furnace. The result is a two times increase in throughput of the furnace system. Depending on the process requirements, production rates of up to 440 lb/hr are possible. The modern vacuum oil quench offers a versatile platform with a compact design capable of multiple processes and high production rates. The traditional two-chamber VOQ offers a batch platform capable of neutral and case hardening through the use of LPC. The three-chamber model provides similar options with the opportunity for high-capacity production through the addition of a preheating chamber with semicontinuous processing. Both demonstrate the advancements and the potential of this modern furnace as flexible, safe, and environmentally-friendly option in oil quenching.

Figure 4. An LPC process that yielded a net 1,322 lb (600 kg) load of gears with an effective case depth of 0.039 in (1 mm). This resulted in a throughput of 294 lb/hr (133 kg/hr). Slight adjustments to this process have rendered production of up to 440 lb/hr. (Source: Maciej Korecki, “Case Study of CMe-T6810-25”)
Source: SECO/VACUUM Technologies

References

Maciej Korecki, “Case Study of CMe-T6810-25 High Volume Production,” SECO/WARWICK S.A.
Maciej Korecki, “Case Study: Heat Treat Equipment Meets the Future Industry Today”
(Heat Treat Today, 2022), https://www.heattreattoday.com/equipment/heat-treating-equipment/vacuum-furnaces/vacuum-furnaces-technical-content/case-study-heat-treat-equipment-meets-the-future-industry-today/.
Don Marteeny and Maciej Korecki, “Triple Chamber Vacuum Furnace Systems – The
Low-Pressure Carburizing Workhorse,” SECO/WARWICK S.A. Presented at Heat Treat 2019
– ASM International.

About the Author: Don Marteeny has been vice president of Engineering for SECO/VACUUM Technologies for over five years. He is a licensed professional engineer and has been a leader at the company over the last several years filling project management and engineering leadership responsibilities. Don is a member of Heat Treat Today’s 40 Under 40 Class of 2021.

For more information:
Contact Don at Don.Marteeny@secowarwick.com

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

It’s Time for Another Look at Vacuum Oil Quenching Read More »

“Quench” Your Thirst: 3 Technical Articles To Satisfy Your Needs

November 13, 2023 / AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

Thirsting for knowledge about quenching, but not sure where to start? Heat Treat Today has coalesced technical information across articles and podcast episodes from key experts, including significant quenching methods, innovative developments with quenching, and how to control temperature during the process.

Discover more about these three topics in today’s Technical Tuesday original content feature.

Monitor Quench Temperatures with Unique Thermal Barrier Designs

Automotive heat treating operations require repeatable operations to ensure that the composite parts within an automobile perform reliably. Steve Offley, also known as “Dr. O," the product marketing manager at PhoenixTM, outlines case studies of several temperature-critical operations to demonstrate how unique thermal barrier design for thru-process monitoring systems can solve temperature measuring problems. These processes include sealed gas carburizing into an integrated oil quench as well as LPC followed by transfer to a sealed high-pressure gas quench chamber.

Offley comments on the quenching process following LPC, saying, "During the gas quench, the [thermal] barrier [for temperature monitoring] needs to be protected from Nitrogen N₂(g) or Helium He(g) gas pressures up to 20 bar." If you are facing heat treat processing with integrated quench, learn more about this temperature monitoring solution.

Read the full article here: Discover the DNA of Automotive Heat Treat: Thru-Process Temperature Monitoring

Intensive Quenching: An Answer for a "Greener" Heat Treat?

Gas furnaces have the potential to be a significant source of carbon emissions in many essential heat treat processes. However, an innovative approach combining induction through heating with intensive quenching could be one answer for greener heat treating, particularly for steel production.

In this article, Chris Pedder, Edward Rylicki, and Michael Aronov share that an “ITH + IQ” technique "eliminates, in many cases, the need for a gas-fired furnace when conducting through hardening and carburizing processes." A lot of this comes down to shortening the time it takes to perform this process, but there is so much more that the authors illuminate in their tests and graphs.

Read the full article here: Induction Through Heating + Intensive Quenching: A “Green Ticket” for Steel Parts

Drinking from a Firehose: Answering Your Quench Questions with a Thorough Radio Review

Stay afloat in a sea of quenching tips with this Heat Treat Radio review, summarizing three recent podcast episodes centered around quenching tips, techniques, and training — especially applying to the auto industry.

Explore the "green" process of salt quenching with Bill Disler of AFC-Holcroft, the topic of water in your quench tank with Greg Steiger of Idemitsu Lubricants America, and a broad review of auto industry quenching with Scott MacKenzie of Quaker Houghton, Inc.

Read the full article here: Heat Treat Quench Questions Answered with Radio Review

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

“Quench” Your Thirst: 3 Technical Articles To Satisfy Your Needs Read More »

Induction Through Heating + Intensive Quenching: A “Green Ticket” for Steel Parts

June 13, 2023 / CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, INDUCTION HEATING EQUIPMENT TECHNICAL CONTENT, INDUCTION HEATING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

On site at heat treat operations, gas-fired furnaces can be a significant source of carbon emissions. But depending on the desired heat treatment, an alternative approach that combines induction through heating and intensive quenching could be the “green ticket.” Learn about the ITH + IQ technique and discover how certain steels may benefit from this approach.

This Technical Tuesday article was composed by Edward Rylicki, Vice President Technology, and Chris Pedder, Technical Manager Heat Treat Products and Services, at Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp., and Michael Aronov, CEO, IQ Technologies, Inc. It appears in Heat Treat Today's May 2023 Sustainable Heat Treat Technologies print edition.

Introduction

Chris Pedder,
Technical Manager Heat Treat Products and Services, Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Induction heating is a green, environmentally friendly technology providing energy savings and much greater heating rates compared to other furnace heating methods. Other advantages of induction heating include improved automation and control, reduced floor space, and cleaner working conditions. Induction heating is widely used in the forging industry for heating billets prior to plastic deformation. Induction heating is also used for different heat treatment operations such as surface and through hardening, tempering, stress relieving, normalizing, and annealing. However, the amount of steel products subjected to induction heating in the heat treating industry is much less compared to that processed in gas-fired furnaces.

Gas-fired heat treating equipment is a major source of carbon emissions in the industry. As shown in Reference 1, induction through heating (ITH) followed by intensive quenching (IQ) (an “ITH + IQ” technique) eliminates, in many cases, the need for a gas-fired furnace when conducting through hardening and carburizing processes — the two most widely used heat treating operations for certain steel parts. Eliminating gas-fired furnaces will result in significant reduction of carbon emissions at on-site heat treat operations.

Dr. Michael Aronov,
CEO, IQ Technologies, Inc.
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

The goal of this article is twofold: 1) to evaluate carbon emissions generated during through hardening of steel parts and carburizing processes when conducted in gas-fired furnaces, and 2) to discuss how these emissions can be reduced to zero using the ITH + IQ process.

Evaluation of Carbon Emissions for Through Hardening and Carburizing Processes

Ed Rylicki,
Vice President Technology, Ajax TOCCO Detroit Development & Support Center
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Most through hardening and carburizing operations for steel parts are conducted in batch and continuous integral quench gas-fired furnaces. Assumptions made for evaluating CO₂ emissions produced by a typical integral quench furnace are presented in Table 1. Note: The values of carbon emissions presented Table 1 are conservative since they don’t consider the amount of CO₂ produced by furnace flame screens and endothermic gas generators used to provide a controlled carburizing atmosphere in the furnace. Also, it’s assumed that the furnace walls are already heated through when loading the parts, so there are no heat losses associated with the thermal energy accumulated by the furnace walls.

Table 1. Assumptions for calculating of carbon emissions by integral quench furnace
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Emissions Generated During the Through Hardening Process

A furnace time/temperature diagram for the through hardening process considered is presented in Figure 1. Carbon emissions E_hard produced by the furnace considered during heating of the load to the austenitizing temperature prior to quenching are calculated by using the following equation,

(Equation 1)
E_hard = k • Q_hard

where:

■ k = the emission coefficient (equal to 0.050 • 10^-3 kg per 1 kJ of released energy when burning natural gas (see Reference 2)
■ Q_hard = thermal energy required for heating up the above load from ambient to the austenitizing temperature

A value of Q_hard is calculated by the equation below,

(Equation 2)

Q_hard = M • C • (T_a -T_o) / Eff = 1,135 • 0.56 • (843 - 20) / 0.65 = 0.805 • 106kJ

where:

■ M = load weight, kg
■ C = steel specific heat capacity (kJ/kg°C)
■ T_a = part austenitizing temperature (°C)
■ T_o = part initial temperature (°C)
■ Eff = furnace thermal efficiency (a ratio of the furnace thermal losses to the gross heat input)

From equations (1) and (2), the amount of carbon emissions produced by the above furnace during one hardening operation is 40.2 kg. To determine an annual amount of carbon emissions, calculate the number of hardening cycles per year (N_hard) run in the furnace. From Figure 1, a duration of one hardening cycle is 4 hours (3 hours for austenitizing of the parts plus 1 hour for quenching the parts in oil and unloading/loading the furnace). Thus, N_hard is equal to:

N_hard = 360 day • 24 hour • 0.85 / 4 hour = 1826

Figure 1
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Annual CO₂ emissions from one integral quench batch gas-fired furnace are 40.2 • 1836 = 73,807 kg, or more than 73 t

Emissions Generated During Carburizing Process

A simplified furnace time/temperature diagram for the carburizing process considered is presented in Figure 2. Carbon emissions (E_carb) produced by the above furnace during the carburizing process are calculated by the following equation,

(Equation 3)

E_carb = k • Q_carb

where:

■ Q_carb = a thermal energy expended by the furnace during the carburizing process. A value of Q_carbamounts to two components:

(Equation 4)

Q_carb = Q_carb1 + Q_carb2

Q_carb in the following equation is:

■ Q_carb1 = energy required for heating up the load to the carburizing temperature
■ Q_carb2 = energy needed for maintaining the furnace temperature during the remaining duration of the carburization process (for compensation of the furnace thermal losses since the parts are already heated up to the carburizing temperature)

A value of Q_carb1 is calculated using equation (2) where the part carburizing temperature T_c is used instead of part austenitizing temperature T_a (see Table 1):

Q_carb1 = 1,135 • 0.56 • (927 – 20) / 0.65 = 0.887 • 10⁶ kJ

A value of Qcarb2 is a sum of the flue gas losses and losses of the thermal energy through the furnace walls by heat conduction. Q_carb2 is evaluated from the following considerations. Since the assumed furnace thermal efficiency is 65%, the furnace heat losses are equal to 35% of the gross heat input to the furnace. Hence, the furnace heat losses Q_loss1 during the load heat up period (the first 3 hours of the carburizing cycle, see Figure 2) are the following:

Q_loss1 = Q_carb1 • 0.35 = 0.887 • 106 • 0.35 = 0.31 • 10⁶ kJ.

The furnace heat losses during the remaining 8 hours of the carburizing cycle Q_loss2 are proportionally greater and are equal to:

Q_loss2 = Q_loss1 • 8 hr /3 hr = 031 • 106 • 8 /3 = 0.827 • 10⁶ kJ

Thus, the total amount of the thermal energy expended by the furnace during the carburizing cycle is Q_carb = 0.887 • 106 + 0.827 • 106 = 1.71 • 106 kJ. The total amount of the CO₂ emissions from carburizing of the load in the furnace considered according to equation (3) is: E_carb = 0.050 • 10^-3 • 1.71 • 10⁶ = 85.7 kg. To determine an annual amount of carbon emissions from one carburizing furnace, calculate the number of carburizing cycles run in the furnace per year. Per Figure 2, a duration of one carburizing cycle is 12 hour (1 hour for the furnace recovery plus 10 hour for carburizing of parts at 927°C plus 1 hour for quenching parts in oil and for unloading and loading the furnace). Thus, the number of carburizing cycles per year N_carb is:

N_carb = 360 day • 24 hr • 0.85 / 12 hr = 612

Figure 2
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Annual CO₂ emissions from one integral quench batch carburizing furnace is about 85.7 • 612 = 52,448 kg, or more than 52 t.

Reducing Carbon Emissions Using the ITH + IQ Process

Reference 1 presents results of two case studies of the ITH + IQ process on automotive input shafts and drive pinions. The study was conducted with a major U.S. automotive part supplier. A two-step heat treating process was used for the input shafts, consisting of batch quenching parts in oil or polymer using an integral quench gas-fired furnace for core hardening followed by induction hardening. This two-step method of heat treatment is widely used in the industry for many steel products. It provides parts with a hard case and tough, ductile core.

Substituting the “ITH + IQ” method for the two-step heat treating process not only eliminates the batch hardening process, but also requires less alloy steel for the shafts that don’t require annealing after forging. Thus, in this case, applying the ITH + IQ technique eliminates two furnace heating processes for the input shafts, resulting in the reduction of the CO₂ emissions to zero for the shafts’ heat treatment. Per client evaluation, as mentioned in Reference 1, the hardness profile in the intensively quenched input shafts was similar to that of the standard shafts. Residual surface compressive stresses in the intensively quenched shafts were greater in most cases compared to that of the standard input shafts, resulting in a longer part fatigue life of up to 300%.

Per Reference 1, the environmentally unfriendly carburizing process can be fully eliminated in most cases for automotive pinions when applying the ITH + IQ method and using limited hardenability (LH) steels that have a very low amount of alloy elements. A case study conducted for drive pinions with one of the major U.S. automotive parts suppliers demonstrates the intensively quenched drive pinions met all client’s metallurgical specifications and passed both the ultimate strength test and the fatigue test. It was shown that the part’s fatigue resistance improved by about 150% compared to that of standard carburized and quenched in oil drive pinions. In addition, distortion of the intensively quenched drive pinions is so low that no part straitening operations were required.

Conclusion

Coupling Ajax TOCCO’s induction through heating method with the intensive quenching process creates a significant reduction of CO₂ emissions produced during heat treatment operations for steel parts. For the through hardening process, eliminating just one batch integral quench gas-fi red furnace will reduce carbon emissions by more than 73 ton per year. For the carburizing process, eliminating just one batch carburizing furnace will reduce carbon emissions by more than 52 ton per year. Note that for continuous gas-fired furnaces, the carbon emission reduction will be much greater due to higher continuous furnaces production rates (hence a much higher fuel consumption).

Per our experience, the ITH + IQ process can be applied to at least 20% of the currently through-hardened and carburized steel parts. Per two major heat treating furnace manufacturers in the U.S., there are thousands of atmosphere integral quench batch and continuous furnaces in operation in the U.S. That means hundreds of gas-fired heat treating furnaces can be potentially eliminated, drastically reducing carbon emissions in the U.S., supporting a lean and green economy.

References

[1] Michael Aronov, Edward Rylicki, and Chris Pedder, “Two Cost-Effective Applications of Intensive Quenching Process for Steel Parts,”Heat Treat Today, October 2021, https://www.heattreattoday.com/processes/quenching/quenching-technical-content/two-cost-effective-applications-for-intensive-quenching-of-steel-parts/.

[2] U.S. Energy Information Administration.

About the Authors:

Ed Rylicki has been in the induction heating industry for over 50 years. He is currently Vice President Technology at Ajax TOCCO Detroit Development & Support Center in Madison Heights, Michigan.

Mr. Chris Pedder has over 34 years of experience at Ajax Tocco Magnethermic involving the development of induction processes in the heat treating industry from tooling concept and process development to production implementation.

Dr. Michael Aronov has over 50 years’ experience in design and development of heating and cooling equipment and processes for heat treating applications. He is CEO of IQ Technologies, Inc. and a consultant to the parent company Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic.

For more information: Contact info@ajaxtocco.com or 800.547.1527

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Induction Through Heating + Intensive Quenching: A “Green Ticket” for Steel Parts Read More »

Not To Be Neglected: Heat Treat Furnace Maintenance Tips

November 2, 2022 / FEATURED NEWS, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Fundamentals of furnace maintenance sometimes fall between that tricky area of realizing their importance and getting pushed to the end of the to-do list. This original content piece shares tips to bring the fundamentals back to where they belong: at the top of the to-do list.

3 Tips From "Effective Integral Quench Furnace Maintenance" Article

Ben Gasbarre
President, Industrial Furnace Systems
Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems

Safety First | Whether the furnace is in operation, or it is having down time, proper safety measures must be in place. Personal protective equipment, proper shut down of power sources, and even the buddy system are topics taken in to consideration.
Asset Management System | Have up-to-date maintenance records available to any and all employees. "Ensuring important information, such as alloy replacements, burner tuning, or control calibration information, can help operations and maintenance personnel as they plan and assess future equipment needs," comments Ben Gasbarre, president industrial furnace systems at Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems.
Cleaning | Reminders include: change filters on combustion blowers, clean things like burners and flame curtains, clean out endothermic gas lines, burn off manual probes at least once a week, etc.

.

3 Tips From "Furnace Diagnostics for Validation, Preventative Maintenance, and R&M" Article

Daniel Hill, PE
Sales Engineer
AFC-Holcroft
Source: AFC-Holcroft

Rules and Regulations | The military and energy industries are sectors that have strict standards to follow. Different heat treating shops are using a software module to maintain furnace data, looking at data reports to make sure the furnace systems are running properly.
Timely Maintenance | Making a maintenance plan and then following it means that no tasks are overlooked or forgotten.
After Repairs and Adjustment | Make sure that after trouble shooting and performing repairs, the software generated reports are examined and that furnaces continue to be maintained. Daniel Hill, PE, sales engineer at AFC-Holcroft says, "This saves valuable time and resources, improves availability, and likely increases profitability."

.

3 Tips From "How CQI-9 Compliant Quench Oil Analysis Can Aid in Proper Care of Quench Oil" Article

Greg Steiger
Senior Key Account Manager
Idemitsu Lubricants America

Proper Levels of Sludge and Water Quench | Failing to keep the quench oil clean results in problems on surface finish. Maintain the quench from the start by filtering, cleaning, and replenishing to keep end product surfaces more acceptable.
Frequency of Sampling | "[The] more often a quench oil is analyzed, the easier it is to use the quench oil analysis as a tool in the proper care of a quench oil," explains Greg Steiger, senior key account manager at Idemitsu Lubricants America.
Regular Addition of Fresh Oil | Proper maintenance of quench oil will result in some loss through filtration. Be sure to replenish.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Not To Be Neglected: Heat Treat Furnace Maintenance Tips Read More »

Heat Treat Quench Questions Answered with Radio Review

October 18, 2022 / AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

Twice a month, Heat Treat Today publishes an episode of Heat Treat Radio, an industry-specific podcast that covers topics in the aerospace, automotive, medical, energy, and general manufacturing realms. Each episode provides industry knowledge straight from the experts.

Stay abreast of quenching tips, techniques, and training --- especially in the auto industry --- with this original content piece that draws from three video/audio episodes.

Heat Treat Radio: The Greenness and Goodness of Salt Quenching with Bill Disler

Bill Disler
President, CEO
AFC-Holcroft
Source: AFC-Holcroft

Sure, salt quenching has been around for quite some time, but this method is coming more to the forefront when we consider some of the concerns and costs of oil quenching. In this Heat Treat Radio episode, listen in to Bill Disler of AFC-Holcroft discuss the pros and cons of salt quenching. His brief overview and then salt versus other quench options will leave you ready to embrace quenching at your heat treat shop.

"I’d say, in general, the most common thoughts with salt are to use it for bainitic quenching. If you’re quenching into a bainitic structure, salt has always been the only way to do this," comments Bill. "But what we’re seeing the growth into, and much more activity, is martensitic quench." As you listen, key into the point of salt quenching offering a "green-minded" solution due to recyclability.

Get the complete episode here.

Heat Treat Radio: Water in Your Quench with Greg Steiger, Idemitsu

Water in the quench tank? How much is too much? What do you do to get rid of it? Is it possible to prevent water from getting into the tank? Greg Steiger of Idemitsu answers these questions and more in this essential episode.

"Our research has shown that basically about 200-250 ppm water, you start to get uneven cooling," Greg Steiger cautions. "When you start getting up to large amounts of water, somewhere around 750 ppm to over 1000 ppm, it becomes a safety issue."

The entire episode gives answers to how to identify, prevent, and remove water in the quench.

Heat Treat Radio: All Things Auto Industry Quenching with Scott MacKenzie

D. Scott MacKenzie, Ph.D
Senior Research -- Metallurgy
Quaker Houghton, Inc.

This interview gets to some nitty gritty details regarding quenching and the shift to electric vehicles. What does the future of heat treating look like for electric vehicles (EVs)? Where is aluminum heat treat fitting in? Listen in to get industry insight on these answers. Scott MacKenzie of Quaker Houghton also explores simulation and modeling, the need for trained metallurgists in our industry, and more broad heat treat considerations.

"The next thing you have to understand is the quenchant itself," Scott MacKenzie advises. "You have to understand the physical properties."

Take in the full episode here.

.

Search for heat treat solution providers and suppliers on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Heat Treat Quench Questions Answered with Radio Review Read More »

QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

Introduction

Rigorous Design for Metallurgical Excellence

No Surface Contamination

Precision Prevents Part Cracking

No Carbon Content Matching

Meeting Environmental Demands

Conclusion

References

About the Author:

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Quenchants — A Brief Overview

Selection of the Optimal Quench Medium

A Common Example — Quench Oil Selection

Final Thoughts

References

About the Author

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Medios de temple: una breve Descripción

Selección del medio de temple óptimo

Un ejemplo común: selección de aceite de temple

Reflexiones finales

Referencias

Sobre el autor

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Understanding a Hardenability Chart (01:59)

About The Guest

Search Heat Treat Equipment And Service Providers On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Gas Carburization

Critical Process Temperature Control

Technology Challenges for Temperature Monitoring

Monitoring Challenges of Sealed Gas Carburization — Oil Quench

Quench Cooling Phases

Summary

References

About the Author

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

A Familiar Scene . . .

Necessity Waiting on Invention

An Invention Waiting on Improvement

HPGQ Drives Improvement in Vacuum Furnace Technology

Vacuum Furnaces Move from Niche to Standard Issue

VOQ Begins to Follow Suit

Which Brings Us to Today

References

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Monitor Quench Temperatures with Unique Thermal Barrier Designs

Intensive Quenching: An Answer for a "Greener" Heat Treat?

Drinking from a Firehose: Answering Your Quench Questions with a Thorough Radio Review

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Introduction

Evaluation of Carbon Emissions for Through Hardening and Carburizing Processes

Emissions Generated During the Through Hardening Process

(Equation 1) Ehard = k • Qhard

where:

■ k = the emission coefficient (equal to 0.050 • 10-3 kg per 1 kJ of released energy when burning natural gas (see Reference 2) ■ Qhard = thermal energy required for heating up the above load from ambient to the austenitizing temperature

(Equation 2)

Qhard = M • C • (Ta -To) / Eff = 1,135 • 0.56 • (843 - 20) / 0.65 = 0.805 • 106kJ

where:

■ M = load weight, kg ■ C = steel specific heat capacity (kJ/kg°C) ■ Ta = part austenitizing temperature (°C) ■ To = part initial temperature (°C) ■ Eff = furnace thermal efficiency (a ratio of the furnace thermal losses to the gross heat input)

Emissions Generated During Carburizing Process

(Equation 3)

Ecarb = k • Qcarb

where:

■ Qcarb = a thermal energy expended by the furnace during the carburizing process. A value of Qcarb amounts to two components:

(Equation 4)

Qcarb = Qcarb1 + Qcarb2

Qcarb in the following equation is:

Reducing Carbon Emissions Using the ITH + IQ Process

Conclusion

3 Tips From "Effective Integral Quench Furnace Maintenance" Article

.

3 Tips From "Furnace Diagnostics for Validation, Preventative Maintenance, and R&M" Article

.

3 Tips From "How CQI-9 Compliant Quench Oil Analysis Can Aid in Proper Care of Quench Oil" Article

Heat Treat Radio: The Greenness and Goodness of Salt Quenching with Bill Disler

Heat Treat Radio: Water in Your Quench with Greg Steiger, Idemitsu

Heat Treat Radio: All Things Auto Industry Quenching with Scott MacKenzie

Our Brands

Company

(Equation 1)
E_hard = k • Q_hard

■ k = the emission coefficient (equal to 0.050 • 10^-3 kg per 1 kJ of released energy when burning natural gas (see Reference 2)
■ Q_hard = thermal energy required for heating up the above load from ambient to the austenitizing temperature

Q_hard = M • C • (T_a -T_o) / Eff = 1,135 • 0.56 • (843 - 20) / 0.65 = 0.805 • 106kJ

■ M = load weight, kg
■ C = steel specific heat capacity (kJ/kg°C)
■ T_a = part austenitizing temperature (°C)
■ T_o = part initial temperature (°C)
■ Eff = furnace thermal efficiency (a ratio of the furnace thermal losses to the gross heat input)

E_carb = k • Q_carb

■ Q_carb = a thermal energy expended by the furnace during the carburizing process. A value of Q_carbamounts to two components:

Q_carb = Q_carb1 + Q_carb2

Q_carb in the following equation is: