During the day-to-day operation of heat treat departments, many habits are formed and procedures followed that sometimes are done simply because that’s the way they’ve always been done. One of the great benefits of having a community of heat treaters is to challenge those habits and look at new ways of doing things. Heat TreatToday‘s 101 Heat TreatTips, tips and tricks that come from some of the industry’s foremost experts, were initially published in the FNA 2018 Special Print Edition, as a way to make the benefits of that community available to as many people as possible. This special edition is available in a digital format here.
In today’s Technical Tuesday, we continue an intermittent series of posts drawn from the 101 tips. The category for this post is Quenching, and today’s tips–#8, #38, and #81–are from three different sources: Dan Herring, “The Heat Treat Doctor®”, of The Herring Group; Combustion Innovations; and Super Systems, Inc.
Heat TreatTip #8
14 Quench Oil Selection Tips
Here are a few of the important factors to consider when selecting a quench oil.
Part Material – chemistry & hardenability
Part loading – fixturing, girds, baskets, part spacing, etc.
Part geometry and mass – thin parts, thick parts, large changes in section size
Distortion characteristics of the part (as a function of loading)
Stress state from prior (manufacturing) operations
Oil type – characteristics, cooling curve data
Oil speed – fast, medium, slow, or marquench
Oil temperature and maximum rate of rise
Agitation – agitators (fixed or variable speed) or pumps
Effective quench tank volume
Quench tank design factors, including number of agitators or pumps, location of agitators, size of agitators, propellor size (diameter, clearance in draft tube), internal tank baffling (draft tubes, directional flow vanes, etc.), flow direction, quench elevator design (flow restrictions), volume of oil, type of agitator (fixed v. 2 speed v. variable speed), maximum (design) temperature rise, and heat exchanger type, size, heat removal rate in BTU/hr & instantaneous BTU/minute.
Keep water out of your oil quench. A few pounds of water at the bottom of an IQ quench tank can cause a major fire. Be hyper-vigilant that no one attempts to recycle fluids that collect on the charge car.
According to Super Systems, Inc., there are one of three problems to consider if your quench is just not cutting it. Although SSI focuses more on atmosphere control systems, when parts come out soft, the problem isn’t always the atmosphere – sometimes it’s the quench. Here are three things to consider regarding your quench:
First, check the composition of the quench media. Is it up to spec? Does it need to be refreshed?
Is the quench receiving adequate agitation to thoroughly quench the load?
Is the quench at the right temperature? If the bath is too warm when the load enters, quenching won’t go well!
Photo credit: Heat Treat Today FNA 2018; Super Systems, Inc.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact the expert who submitted the Tip or contact Heat TreatTodaydirectly. If you have a heat treat tip that you’d like to share, please send to the editor, and we’ll put it in the queue for our next Heat TreatTipsissue.
A Cleveland-based heat treatment software and engineering firm, specializing in metallurgical process engineering and thermal/stress analysis of metal parts, recently announced that mechanical and fatigue testing is underway on an innovative gas quenching unit designed to minimize component distortion during the hardening process.
The DANTE Controlled Gas Quenching (DCGQ) unit is capable of quenching single components following a time-temperature schedule designed for a specific component and steel alloy using the DANTE software.
DANTE Solutions proposed the concept of the process and the DANTE Controlled Gas Quench (DCGQ) unit and collaborated with Milwaukee-based Atmosphere Engineering (now part of United Process Controls), which built the unit, and Akron Steel Treating. The project is funded by the US Army Defense Directorate (ADD), and the aim market is aerospace, where high hardenability steels are used for gears, bearings, and shafts.
According to Justin Sims, a mechanical engineer with DANTE Solutions, the project began with Phase 1, wherein the team had to “make sure that a relatively slow cooling rate through the martensite transformation did not degrade material properties.”
“Phase 1 showed that we had comparable results for hardness, tensile properties, Charpy impact properties, and bending fatigue to the standard quenching practice for Ferrium C64,” said Sims. “We then initiated Phase 2 and had a unit built that was capable of controlling the temperature of the incoming quench gas to within +/- 5°C.” Phase 2 will end December 2018 after two years. The Phase 1 process currently has a patent pending.
Mechanical & Fatigue testing is currently underway at Akron Steel Treating Company where the unit is installed, and samples have been processed to compare the DCGQ process to standard HPGQ of high alloy steels. The current steel under investigation is Ferrium C64. Sims noted that DANTE is overseeing the processing of the test materials, and commercial metallurgical testing companies are performing the tests.
Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory completed the hardness, tensile and Charpy impact testing, and the results are similar for conventionally hardened C64 samples and DCGQ processed samples. IMR Test Labs is conducting the bending fatigue tests. The US Army at Fort Eustis will conduct the rolling contact fatigue tests.
“We have hardness, tensile, and Charpy impact results from the unit we can share with anyone who is interested,” said Sims. “Distortion, bending fatigue, and rolling contact fatigue are currently being evaluated and the results will be available before the end of 2018.”
“We believe that the DANTE Controlled Gas Quench (DCGQ) process, patent pending, has the potential to change the way heat treating is performed on high hardenability steels,” added Sims. “By controlling the temperature of the incoming quench gas, components experience a near uniform transformation to martensite. This near-uniform transformation has the potential to eliminate post-heat treatment correction operations by minimizing part distortion and allowing designers to account for the size change distortion in the initial design of a component. To date, mechanical and dynamic properties for Ferrium C64 processed using the standard hardening process and the DCGQ process has been identical. Bend fatigue and rolling contact fatigue are currently being evaluated.”
Last week, we ran a news release about ThermoFusion in California expanding their heat treat capabilities to include marquenching and austempering (click here to see that release). In that short article, some comments were made about the aggressiveness of various quench methods and their effect on distortion and cracking.
Joe Powell, of Akron Steel Treating Company, Integrated Heat Treating Solutions, LLC, IQDI Products, LTD., and IQ Technologies Inc, one of the heat treat industry’s foremost experts on quenching, wrote in to help educate all of us a bit more on the finer points of quenching. Below are his comments. Joe can be reached at JoePowell@akronsteeltreating.com.
Doug,
In your recent article, you stated that Marquenching and Austempering use a “less aggressive” quench cooling rate, “and reduce distortion caused by rapid temperature change (thermal shock)” which is only half true. The main mechanism that allow a molten salt quench to reduce distortion is the elimination of mixed phase cooling – there is no slow film boiling (gas) phase cooling mixed with the high-evaporative cooing phase of nucleate boiling, but only a single phase of all liquid convection cooling. It’s the non-uniformity of cooling at the surface of the part that will distort or crack the part not so much the rate of cooling.
Joe
Joseph A. Powell, President Akron Steel Treating Company
A systematical approach regarding different distortion potentials in the process chain describes the influence on dimensional and shape changes of gears and sliding sleeves after case-hardening, like part geometry, cold and hot forming of blanks, carburizing concept and temperature profile, oil and gas quenching, as well as individual press and batch hardening. The results show an excellent potential of the new SyncroTherm® concept compared to the conventional case-hardening process for gears and sliding sleeves. Stable distortion characteristics even at elevated temperatures and without decreasing to hardening temperature as well as a good performance after two-dimensional batch quenching instead of the much more expensive individual press quenching were found in this study. Very sensitive part geometries are still a challenge. A clear limitation was found when processing cold formed blanks without annealing before soft machining.
Dr. Volker Heuer, Gunther Schmitt, Dr. Thorsten Leist, ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH, Hanau
1. Introduction
Case hardening is the most common heat treatment for gears, shafts and synchronizer parts used in gear boxes for automotive and commercial vehicle applications. A combination of high fatigue resistance as well as good machinability and reliable process stability in heat treatment ensures transmission components with maximum strength, excellent performance and cost efficient production. In order to decrease the costs for hard machining and reduce the risk of grinding burns the knowledge of distortioncharacteristics for the individual part as well as distortion carrier potentials of the entire process chain is essential for an improved series production with minimum stock removal [1]. Even today with much higher requirements relating to lightweight design of automotive part geometries this aspect becomes more and more important [2]. Predictable and stable distortion characteristics are still a challenge especially for sensitive parts with thin cross-sections, non-symmetric design and a global production with many different suppliers in the process chain. In a constant pursuit for optimizing, ZF in Friedrichshafen investigated the potential of new heat treatment concepts with the advantages of reduced costs, quicker processes and less distortion. A comparison of the new heat treatment concept SyncroTherm® from ALD Vacuum Technologies was performed with the conventional benchmark concepts of a) case-hardening of gears in a pusher-type furnace with atmospheric gas carburizing and oil quenching and b) press quenching of sliding sleeves directly after gas carburizing in a rotary furnace. The “SyncroTherm®” heat treatment concept combines the benefits of smaller furnaces and two-dimensional batches, fast low-pressure carburizing (LPC) at elevated temperatures and reduced distortion by applying high-pressure gas quenching and the possibility of part-related individual quenching parameters [3].
2. Standard processes for transmission components at ZF Friedrichshafen
2.1 Material, forging and machining
The material for transmission components like gears and synchronizer parts is the case-hardening steel ZF7B which is a modified 20MnCr5. The process chain is shown in Figure 1. The material for automotive and commercial vehicle applications is usually continuously casted and formed to different bar geometries in the steel mill. The forging supplier performs either hot or cold forming of blanks. The gears investigated in this study were all hot formed and later F/P-annealed with an isothermal transformation in order to ensure a good machinability of the ferritic/ pearlitic microstructure. The forged blanks are soft machined by turning and teeth milling. Measurements of characteristic dimensions, shapes and teeth geometries were performed before and after heat treatment in order to describe the distortion behavior. Grinding the bore and teeth flanks is usually performed as the last process before assembling into the gear box. Two different process chains were investigated for the siding sleeve. The first one was similar to the gears with hot forming, F/P-annealing and soft machining. The other process chain for similar part geometry of the sliding sleeve was cold rolling and broaching of the internal spline without F/P-annealing. Different dimensions and shapes which are sensitive to distortion were measured before and after case hardening.
2.2 Case-hardening in pusher-type furnaces
The typical final heat treatment of gears is case-hardening in a pusher-type furnace. The gears are charged in three-dimensional batches of around 220 kg per batch including fixtures. The batches of helical and planet gears which were investigated in this study were loaded by different layers of gears on grids (Figure 2). Depending on the case-hardening depth with an individual cycle time the batch is pushed through the furnace with the different linked processes pre-washing, pre-heating at 480 °C, carburizing at 940 °C, decreasing to hardening temperature 850 °C, oil quenching, washing, tempering at 170 °C and cooling down to approximately 50 °C.
2.2 Case-hardening in rotary furnaces and press quenching
More distortion critical synchronizer parts, like the sliding sleeve, are carburized in a rotary furnace at 930 °C with different levels in the furnace.For a three-track press quench three parts are laying on a tablet and the tablet moves in a cycle time of approximately 70 s through the rotary furnace in order to achieve the required case-hardening depth of around 0.5 mm. The parts are quenched directly from carburizing temperature 930 °C and different tools are fixed to the part before quenching which is shown in Figure 3. During the quenching process the inner diameter of the sliding sleeve shrinks onto the mandrel with similar tooth geometry as the internal spline of the part. This behavior enables a constant inner diameter and position of teeth with less run-out and scattering. In order to adjust the flatness the sliding sleeve is pushed by a pressure piece onto the support ring during quenching. All tools are designed with oil drillings in order to achieve an efficient and uniform quenching of the cross-section. The distortion characteristics of press quenched parts are extremely depending on the design of individual tools and the quenching parameters like temperature and flow of the quenching oil or retention force of the pressure piece. Most synchronizer parts are ready for assembling after press hardening and shot blasting, no additional hard machining is performed anymore.
3. Investigation
The main idea of ALD-SyncroTherm® concept is a small and flexible furnace that can realize a quick low-pressure carburizing process (LPC) at elevated temperatures and reduced distortion behavior of the carburized parts by using an adjustable high-pressure gas quenching. Differently from the standard processes at ZF, parts are loaded in one single 2D-layer on light carbon-fibre tablets, as shown in Figure 4, and then directly heated up to carburizing temperature real quick, which can be up to 1050 °C. The LPC furnace with its small floor space of e. g. a turning machine has up to six single carburizing slots, where each tablet can be heat treated individually. After the carburizing process has been finished, the parts are transported to the internal gas quenching chamber where the parts are quenched directly from carburizing temperature (see Figure 4 left) [4].
This is also a deviation to the direct batch quenching process at ZF where the part temperature is lowered to hardening temperature 840 °C before quenching with respect to distortion. Figure 5 shows a comparison of three different time/ temperature profiles which were tested within this analysis in order to achieve a CHD of 0.8 mm. The standard batch hardening process in a pusher-type furnace is compared to two different LPC processes with variation in carburizing temperature. In order to reduce distortion already during heating, the parts in the standard process at ZF are not being heated up to carburizing temperature directly but have a pre-heating step at 490 °C in order to equalize the core and surface temperature. For the LPC process with carburizing at 980 °C the overall process time is much shorter due to the higher temperature and the missing pre-heating step and the direct quenching from carburizing temperature. The reduced process time is even more pronounced when carburizing is performed at 1050 °C. All three profiles have been tested with different common parts for truck and bus transmissions. Figure 6 shows the three types of parts that have been chosen. The tests have been performed with a small planetary gear for bus transmissions and a heavier and bigger helical gear for heavy truck transmissions. Both gears are direct hardened at ZF by using the batch hardening process in a pusher-type furnace. Other experiments have been performed with two different types of sliding sleeves but similar geometry, as shown in Figure 6. Both types of sliding sleeves were processed differently: one type is machined from cold formed blanks whereas the other type is machined from hot formed and F/P-annealed blanks. Due to their high distortion potential, the standard process for sliding sleeves at ZF is carburizing in rotary furnaces with a consecutive press quenching. For each part many different dimensions, shapes and tooth geometries were measured before and after heat treatment in order to describe the individual distortion characteristics. Here, just critical features are shown which are representative for the distortion characteristics. For gears those are the internal diameter of the bore and the angular flank deviation fHb of the teeth. For the sliding sleeves the diameter of the internal spline and the flatness of the end face are the critical characteristics.
4. Results
4.1 Metallographic results
Metallographic results of the different tests were analyzed by investigation of one part from each batch since a correct metallographic result is the premise for the later analysis of the distortion and evaluation of the LPC process. Table 1 shows the different metallographic results of the analyzed parts from experiments at different carburizing temperatures and the results of the ZF benchmark processes, as a comparison. It shows that the LPC furnace is able to produce correct and repeatable metallographic results within specification regarding CHD, surface hardness and core strength.
For bigger cross sections, like for the helical gear, the lower core strength is explainable due to the lower quenching speedof gas quenching compared to oil quenching in general and even further reduced gas quenching speed with respect to distortion of this gear. Additionally the amount of retained austenite could be maintained well within the required specification (max. 30 %) with the ALD furnace, even after quenching directly from carburizing temperature. Figure 7 shows micrographs of the grain sizes from core and surface samples taken from the heat treated parts with carburizing at 980 °C and 1050 °C and etched according to Bechet-Beaujard. Whereas the samples which were carburized at 980 °C show a homogeneous distribution of fine grains with grain size classes 5 and finer, the samples carburized at 1050 °C show an inhomogeneous distribution and very coarse grains with grain size classes up to 1 and coarser. These findings where confirmed through all performed experiments. This shows that conventional ZF case-hardening steel grades can already provide grain size stability up to 980 °C but not higher. For carburizing the parts at 1050 °C significant grain growth will occur in conventional grades. In order to prevent coarse grains microalloyed case-hardening steels are definitely necessary in order to meet the grain size specification [5]. Even knowing this fact already at the beginning, distortion experiments were performed at the higher temperatures, nevertheless, in order to analyze also the effect of grain growth on the part geometry and on distortion characteristics after heat treatment.
4.2 Comparison of distortion results – internal diameter of planet gears
In order to analyze the distortion of the internal bore, it was measured in three different levels of the bore. Figure 8 shows the location of the measuring levels M1-M3 within the internal bore of planet gears and the respective results from the green parts (12sample parts), the benchmark process (24 sample parts) and the LPC experiment at 980 °C (12 sample parts).
Whereas the three average values of the green parts show a perfect cylindrical form of the bore with almost no scattering, the measurement of the ZF benchmark process carburized at 940 °C shows a clear barrel shape of the internal bore with higher scattering. The same shape change can be observed in the results from the LPC experiment, although the value of the shape change and the scattering is less pronounced. The significantly lesser scattering of the heat treatment distortion compared to the benchmark process was even realized during experiments with a high carburizing temperature of 1050 °C (see Figure 9 left). Moreover the average value stays on the same level as after the experiment at 980 °C even if a significant grain growth was determined with no negative influence on distortion characteristics. The smaller diameter of the bore compared to the ZF process is explainable with the direct quenching from carburizing temperature without lowering the temperature, as it is done during the ZF process. These results are very stable even after carburizing at 1050 °C and were confirmed by two additional batches with same heat treatment parameters (Figure 9 right).
4.3 Comparison of distortion results – angular deviation of flank line fHβ
The value fHβ describes the angular deviation of a measured line along the tooth flank (see Figure 10) from the theoretically defined line of the tooth flank. It was measured on the left and on the right flank of three teeth per gear with a distance of 120° on the circumference. The same teeth and flanks have been measured before and after heat treatment. The results show that the fHβ of both flanks is highly influenced by the case hardening process. If compared to the measurements of the green parts, where the average value of the deviation is almost 0 mm with a maximum range of 0.02 mm, the average deviation after the benchmark heat treatment is −0.03 mm with a wide range for both flanks up to 0.08 mm.
The results of the LPC experiments are comparable to the benchmark process and even slightly better. While average deviation of both tooth flanks is on the same level as the value after the ZF process, the range is slightly smaller. The maximum range for the LPC tests at 980 °C is 0.06 mm even if the parts were directly quenched from carburizing temperature. Figure 11 shows that the average angular deviation and the range are less influenced by the heat treatment concept and the carburizing temperature of the process. Especially for the LPC process, negative influences on distortion may be compensated by adapted and optimized gas quenching parameters. Comparing the much smaller planet gear (tooth width 34 mm, helical angle 7°) with the bigger helical gear (tooth width 50 mm, helical angle 23°) different characteristics regarding the average and range of angular deviation can be determined. The planet gear shows a similar average of fHβ before and after heat treatment for both heat treatment concepts and different carburizing temperatures. The range of fHβ is slightly increased after heat treatment and is similar for the benchmark and the LPC process. For the bigger helical gear it is different. The average of fHβ changes afterheat treatment significantly and the range is much higher. There is also a significant difference between the benchmark and the LPC process for the average of fHβ but not for the range of fHβ. This is a clear indication for more sensitive distortion characteristics of the helical gear. The significant difference in distortion behavior is mainly influenced by the bigger helical angle of the wider helical gear compared to the narrower planet gear with the smaller helical angle [6].
4.4 Comparison of distortion results – sliding sleeves
Sliding sleeves are distortion critical parts and therefore are case hardened and press quenched as a standard process in the ZF Company. In order to define the distortion of sliding sleeves, the internal diameter and the flatness where investigated. Different from the batch quenching in the LPC furnace, both characteristics are being controlled during press quenching of the ZF benchmark process by using individual press hardening tools. The investigation has been performed with 10 pieces of green parts, 25 pieces for the benchmark process and 10 pieces for each of the LPC experiments. For a better comparability of the results, the values of the measurements have been standardized and fitted into the tolerance band so that a value of 0 mm indicates the exact center of the allowed tolerance.
4.4.1 Cold formed
The investigation of the sliding sleeves machined from cold formed blanks shows how the press hardening tools of the ZF benchmark process influences the internal diameter by forcing it to shrink onto a defined tool diameter of the hardening mandrel. The intended negative deviation of the green parts of 0.05 mm from the ideal diameter, based on long-term experiences, is corrected after the ZF heat treatment (Figure 12). Additionally the press hardening tools reduce the scattering of dimensional and shape changes to a minimum. The results after carburizing at 960 °C and gas quenching in a batch of the LPC furnace display a tremendous heat treatment distortion and scattering of results in a large range. Even with optimized quenching parameters the range is nearly 1.0 mm. The reason for this worse distortion behavior can be explained by the high amount of residual stresses after cold forming of the blanks which are not removed by later annealing and soft machining.
A heating experiment where the parts were heated up to 960 °C without carburizing and afterwards slowly cooled down to room temperature was performed. This test was done in order to define the amount of distortion that is induced by residual stresses from former process steps already during heating. It clearly shows a high distortion potential of the sliding sleeves machined from cold formed blanks. Whereas the average diameter does not change the scattering is very large and, with a range of 0.65 mm, almost as wide as after the complete process with carburizing and quenching (Figure 12 left). This assumption was also confirmed by the distortion analysis of the parts flatness (Figure 12 right) where similar distortion behavior can be observed. This means that, without controlling dimensions by hardening tools, sliding sleeves that are machined from cold formed blanks cannot be heat treated within the required specification.
4.4.2 Hot formed
The distortion of sliding sleeves machined from hot formed blanks with a later F/P-annealing before soft machining, which reduces the residual stresses from prior process steps to a minimum, is significantly different compared to the cold formed sliding sleeve without F/P-annealing like previously described. The average diameter of the sliding sleeve after the ZF benchmark process is located near the upper tolerance with a slightly wider scattering (Figure 13 left) than after the heat treatment of cold formed sliding sleeves. Even by using optimized hardening tools for each part geometry the individual distortion behavior depends also on the forging lot and hardenability of the individual steel heat. Although some parts were outside of tolerance the final gage test applied on these parts showed that they are still usable for assembly. The heating experiment in the LPC furnace without carburizing reveals a smaller distortion potential due to minimized residual stresses of the hot formed and F/P-annealed blanks. Looking at the range of the diameter, it is just slightly wider when compared with the range of the green parts. This minimal distortion regarding the range can be preserved even after a completed experiment with carburizing and optimized gas quenching. Still, without the limiting function of a hardening mandrel, the average diameter shrinks as much as −0.38 mm after the heat treatment (Figure 13 left). The reproducibility of the described behavior of the LPC experiment with hot formed sliding sleeves was confirmed by two additional experiments with carburizing temperatures of 960 °C and of 1050 °C (Figure 13 right). Even the sliding sleeves from the final test that were carburized at 1050 °C show an average diameter that remains stable at the same level as those carburized at 960 °C. The additional scattering, that results of a higher quenching intensity, is minimal and in total still less than the tolerance band width of 0.2 mm. Therefore, producing sliding sleeves with the LPC process that fit the requirement might be possible if the dimensions of soft machining are adjusted with respect to the distortion behavior after heat treatment. This conclusion bears the potential of reducing heat treatment costs for distortion critical parts made from hot formed and F/P-annealed blanks by replacing the cost intensive press quenching followed by washing and shot blasting with a batch quenching process in the LPC furnace. However, this potential has to be investigated more in-depth before changing the process chain.
5. Summary
This paper describes a systematical analysis of different distortion potentials for case hardening processes. Different influences on distortion characteristics were investigated and defined such as different part geometries, process chains, carburizing concepts, temperature profiles and quenching methods. The main focus was on the comparison of the new SyncroTherm® concept by ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH with established case hardening processes at ZF Friedrichshafen AG. The results show an excellent potential of the new LPC concept for gears and sliding sleeves. Stable distortion characteristics even at elevated temperatures and without decreasing to hardening temperature as well as a good performance after two-dimensional batch quenching instead of the much more expensive individual press quenching were found. However, very sensitive part geometries, such as sliding sleeves, are still a challenge. A clear limitation regarding the SyncroTherm® concept was found for sliding sleeves machined from cold formed blanks without F/P-annealing before soft broaching the internal spline.
Zoch, H.-W.: Distortion Engineering – Interim results after one decade within the Collaborative Research Center. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Distortion Engineering, 1416.09.11, Bremen, H.-W. Zoch, Th. Luebben (Eds.), 2011, p. 569‒579; Mat.-wiss. Werkstofftechn. 43 (2012) 1‒2, p. 9‒15, DOI: 10.1002/mawe.201100881
Heuer, V.; Löser, K.; Schmitt, G.; Ritter, K.: Einsatzhärten im Fertigungstakt. HTM J. Heat Treatm. Mat. 68 (2013) 3, p. 113‒123, DOI: 10.3139/105.110184
Heuer, V.; Leist, Th.; Schmitt, G.: Distortion control through synchronized vacuum heat treatment. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Distortion Engineering, 23-25.09.15, Bremen, H.-W. Zoch, Th. Luebben (Eds.), 2015, p. 183‒192
Hippenstiel, F.; Kohlmann, R.; Bleck, W.; Clausen, B.; Hoffmann, F.; Pouteau, P.: Innovative Einsatzstähle als maßgeschneiderte Werkstofflösung zur Hochtemperaturaufkohlung von Getriebekomponenten. HTM J. Heat Treatm. Mat. 57 (2002) 4, p. 290‒298
Heeß, K.: Maßund Formänderungen infolge Wärmebehandlung von Stählen.
ed., Expert Verlag, Renningen, 2007. – ISBN 978-3-8169-3067-9